I'm increasingly realizing that the true moat of an ecosystem is its own token standard.
With so many use-case-specific L2s and app chains on ETH emerging, what’s keeping the general-purpose L2s like ARB/OP/ZKsync afloat?
I really don't know. Generalized EVM chains (L1 and L2 alike) invest heavily to buy partnerships and enterprise users. But without being particularly good at/known for something, and now facing
@plumefor for RWA,
@UnichainApp for DeFi, and
@base for distribution, what are their remaining rights to win?
🤷🏻♀️. It's a head-scratcher.
Users and developers are pragmatic & mercenary by nature and shift from one ERC20 chain to another based on incentives and UX. Most ERC-20-based chains compete on commoditized features like speed and cost. UX and community can be a lasting moat once they reach escape velocity — but building culture is a hard job and demands a completely different skill set (I will say tho
@monad_xyz and
@berachain got the chops for this).
Now - why is Solana killing it? Many reason but I think SPL is a major one. Bootstrapping a new standard is a pain in the butt but that's also how network effect is truly formed: it's the crypto equivalent of vendor lock-in in web2. Exhibit A - DePIN projects want to be SPL to interoperate with each other
This is also why I'm perma-bull on
@Stacks for their SIP10 and the double-digit ecosystem they've managed to build on top.
And
@ArchNtwrk for their generational opportunity to create the first truly fungible token standard on BTC—the largest liquidity pool, period.