The market has not really grasp what a gem of a site
$IREN's Childress site actually is. If they didn't grasp idea previously, they certainly should have a better idea after today's announcement of an additional 150 MW being added immediately to available power capacity. Perhaps it's still the lingering effects of the
@CulperResearch's hit piece, but the market should really do better DD than relying on that BS for a trust fund baby. Just in case, I will present the bull case for Childress.
The 2 biggest things you need for a DC site is land and power, and Childress has it in spades.
$RIOT's Corsicana is hailed as a gem with it's 1 GW connection agreement, granted that is very impressive, and there won't be many 1 GW sites going around in the future. However, I have posted (more as a joke) about the hilly terrain that Corsicana sits upon, and one of the reasons why construction there is slower relative to the pace of other similar sites that are flat such as Childress. In terms of space, this is where Childress really trumps Corsicana. Corsicana is listed as 265 acres, and Childress is listed as 420 acres on their respective websites (insert blunt joke here). However, that is actually underselling the true size of Childress. 422.59 acres is actually only the largest 1 of 3 parcels own by
$IREN at this location. The other 2 parcels are 79.55 and 78.73 acres respectively, giving it a total of 580.87 acres, which is more than 2X the size of Corsicana in terms of acreage.
From the investor deck released yesterday, IREN has outlined the boundaries of the Childress site, which is in line with the 3 parcels of land shown here in the satellite maps. IREN was also kind enough to leave us easter eggs of high res panoramic views in their deck. I have outlined the boundaries on one of the high res views just to give people a sense of the scale at Childress, and what else can be built at this location.
The other piece of puzzle is power. Not many people saw the additional 150 MW coming, myself included. However, if anyone is paying close attention to what
@danroberts0101 has said previously about the the Texas panhandle, then it is not really that surprising. According to him, there is about 32 GW of power generation coming from wind and solar, but only 12 GW of transmission lines to bring that power to population markets further south in Texas. There is still a lot of wasted power generation. This leads me to believe this site can have even further capacity added in future. We just don't know what stage of development the future hypothetical capacity addition is at, but it's certainly possible. That would truly be big cherry on top for this site.
It would be disingenuous to talk about building DCs without talking about cooling. Texas is hot and there isn't much water around. However, we know there now very effective solutions without much water usage, or at all, to this part of the equation. I keep echoing the Lancium deal to build DCs for
$MSFT and
$ORCL in West Texas as proof, as well as pointing to these type of solutions being implemented in similar climates in Arizona and Georgia.
Given the ample land that is owned by
$IREN to build on this site, and now 150 MW of additional power capacity available immediately, that is de facto getting a 150 MW site for free. What would happen if one of the other BTC miners announced that they have acquired a 150 MW, 160 acre site in Texas, and it was for free? How much value would that have been added to the company's market cap? This is essentially what has happened here to IREN. Eventually the market will get it, they're still giving you a discount on
$IREN today.
From my post yesterday, I speculated that 100 MW was left over after expansion to 40 EH by IREN. That is now at 250 MW. On top of the BTC mining, Childress is now a 250 MW greenfield site for AI/HPC that is available now, if you can build fast enough. How many other 250 MW greenfield sites are available out there with power right now? Please also keep in mind that a single contiguous 250 MW site is worth more than 250 MW of cobble sites in aggregate. With today's announcement, it leads me to conclude that the engineering drawings of a T3 DC were in fact based on Childress. Will there be a customer soon? That, I have zero clue at this point. We'll just have to wait and find out.