CIA and Mossad and pedo elite are running some kind of sex trafficking entrapment blackmail ring out of Puerto Rico and caribbean islands. They are going to frame me with a laptop planted by my ex gf who was a spy. They will torture me to death.

Common sense often goes out the window in crypto: BTC: A SoV with a broken long-term security model ETH: A smart contract platform without capacity XRP: A centralized "cryptocurrency" In this light & without retreating into obscurity, SOL starts to look damn good in comparison!

hello world computer

ethereum will never trade above four thousand dollars as long as i live on the planet earth

Balancer was hacked for ~$100M. Hacker seems experienced: 1. Seeded account via 100 ETH and 0.1 Tornado Cash deposits. No opsec leaks 2. Since there were no recent 100 ETH Tornado deposits, likely that exploiter had funds there from previous exploits

This is why Ethereum is losing. People propose a very well speced and concretely motivated EIP then some alignment larp tells them "eth solves for economic incentives with real consequences". Bro do you realize your chain has 12 second block times? Do you realize your chain processes 100x fewer tps than Solana? Do you realize that economic activity has fled to Solana? Why don't you guys go solve those real economic problems then? Oh wait you can't because thats not your job. Your job is to "sell ethereum to tradfi", and the first EIP in years that might have helped you do that got killed because of religious zealotry on ACD. Gaurentee you if this EIP had passed you would be spam tweeting about how this was going to turbo charge ethereum ETFs or some other equally unoriginal take to the one you have offered here because that is what you do. You are basically an AI agent prompted with "whatever anyone says on X dot com, find a way to spin it into being bullish for ethereum".

$ETH is going to $32k 2025 🚀

bro the ETH foundation is paying researchers and devs that are responsible for (i) ethereum not bleeding 5M ETH/year to proof of work (ii) your fees being low today (iii) your txs getting included in < 30s instead of like 1-30 min (eip 1559) show some respect

One day the stockholm syndrome will wear off And then we can progress forward

🚨 BREAKING: The $SUI blockchain has been down for 51 minutes, with no blocks produced during this period.

Ethereum is in deep trouble UNI moving off-chain is only the final nail in the coffin, all apps are moving to competing L1s & L2s instead Collapsing ETH revenue, UNI was ETH's biggest fee-paying customer! Now ETH is being left behind, irrelevant & broken; Ethereum is cooked 🧵 What did we expect would happen after pushing all usage to competing chains ("L2 scaling") A cucked course of action from the perspective of ETH Betraying ETH's cypherpunk dream for the sake of L2 VC funding, as the ultrasound money meme has now been thoroughly defeated by "L2 scaling" It is as clear as day from the moment Dank Sharding was implemented, as you can see in the chart below: It shows that when users move off the L1 significantly fewer fees end up on the L1, decreasing the burn rate. This should have been obvious from the start. This usage & resulting revenue is now getting captured by rent-seeking L2s instead! That is what makes it parasitic, as only a fraction of the fees ends up back in the L1, while for-profit companies get to keep the rest. All while these same parties lobby to keep ETH's L1 block space constrained This chart released by @Unchained_pod even shows how for every dollar paid to the L1 OP gets to keep 300 dollars! If that is not extractive, I do not know what is: EIP-4844 only accelerated that process, by giving L2s a cheap place to put their data while entirely ignoring L1 users, that is why UNI is forced to move elsewhere: The fact that a swap cost over $30 on ETH now is completely unacceptable, as well as a $60 NFTs sale fee, what is this clown world? 🤡 It is all effectively a giant middle finger to the incredible achievements of ETH DeFi, as they break up the kingdom into smaller parts for the sake of selfish profit. High fees kill utility & innovation every single time: UNI should move as far as possible away from ETH as possible as far as I am concerned The UNI L2 will have its own validator set anyway, so it will be entirely possible for them to pivot to becoming an L1 in their own right in the future, or they will deploy the uni app natively on an alternative chain eventually The only reason left to deploy on ETH is the security, however, security is based on revenue in the long run. This is why ETH is on a steady path to nowhere with its current roadmap, as L2s are sucking all of the life out of it Bait & Switch: We all noticed it, we are not stupid, just like we also noticed it for BTC, as the light of truth exposes all of the corruption As instead of a "global computer"; a single composable state where all DeFi could interoperate; ETH is now a fragmented ecosystem of centralized service providers... The complete opposite of what ETH was supposed to become, to make it even worse: Remember ETH 2.0? Scaling the L1 through execution sharding; That has now been successfully implemented on NEAR & EGLD with more soon to come. All while purely parallelized chains make a decent case for not even needing to implement sharding & still keeping up with massive demand! As the technology has advanced so far we can even say that we have solved the classical blockchain trilemma in practice, making all of the compromises inherent in ETH's "L2 scaling" entirely unnecessary All while the ETH core developers claim that scaling the L1 while preserving decentralization is "impossible", an unbearable state of affairs Conclusion: Ethereum is effectively bankrupt, not just intellectually & ethically but also economically Still riding on the laurels of its past success, most cannot see the writing on the wall At this point, Ethereum deserves to lose, as it has been doing over the last year, losing ground to its technologically far superior competitors. The success of UNI is no longer correlated with the success of ETH The numbers do not lie, ETH has made itself irrelevant & it will continue to decline as it continues down this self-destructive path. The future now belongs to the countless alternatives that are open for business now!

11/ i've never said this in public before but, it's time Proof of Stake was a mistake Ethereum could have been a trillion dollar protocol with its own robust energy to compute ecosystem. instead MEV extracts billions in value from users and apps.

I am a zoomer ETH maxi. Yes we are real, yes we exist. ETH to $140k.

Unpopular opinion: At this current state of the market, $ETH is likely the simplest and safest 20x opportunity still available.

Because of my position I don’t even trade on chain. Every once in a while I’ll do a usdc/usdt $1 swap to test priority fee pricing. Unless you are a socialist, profit == value consumer derives from the product excess of labor and costs.

5. Stablecoin volumes in the Ethreum ecosystem are now competitive with major payment processing networks, including Mastercard and Visa.

Solana is destined to become the most decentralized blockchain! Decentralization ultimately comes from fees, without scalability; Ethereum loses the game SOL price only needs to double to surpass ETH's security budget! As no one has a monopoly on decentralization & security 🧵 Relative to market capitalization, we can even argue that SOL is more decentralized now: ETH's Nakamoto Coefficient is 2! SOL's Nakamoto Coefficient is 19! (Nakamoto Coefficient measures the number of parties that need to collude for an attack) This is a direct consequence of ETH's decision not to implement native delegation, resulting in a single provider (Lido) dominating staking instead! We can also compare the total number of validators; in the case of ETH, these figures are often extremely misleading. ETH supporters often fall into the bad habit of counting multiples of 32 ETH instead of the physical machines involved in block production! Here are the real numbers: ETH has 8.8k validators SOL has 1.1k validators (Counting ETH consensus clients using "Ethernodes" as the source. For SOL, we count validators using "Solana Beach" as the source) ETH has a clear lead here; however, this is all while ETH has a market cap that is five times that of SOL! As the number of validators absolutely does scale with the value of the network. ETH still wins in this particular metric, but this is not a meaningful difference As I mentioned in the opening, SOL only needs to double in price for it to exceed ETH's security budget What is interesting about this is that this is even possible at a fifth of ETH's market capitalization. As that makes SOL significantly more efficient in terms of security. This is primarily due to SOL having a higher staking participation rate, which is more due to circumstance than any particular design feature: ETH has a security budget of $50.5B SOL has a security budget of $25.3B Here is the security budget math: ETH 524B+0.97B+3.33B x 0.29 x 0.33 = $50.5B SOL 107B+0.70B+5.26B x 0.68 x 0.33 = $25.3B (Market capitalization + fees + inflation / staking participation rate / attack threshold) The most commonly ignored decentralization metric is governance; this is where SOL wins. ETH has thoroughly rejected the idea of on-chain stakeholder governance, whereas SOL is continuing down the path of true decentralization. Even if SOL's on-chain governance is still relatively basic & incomplete, the social contract has at least been established. Whereas the opposite of that is now true for ETH: ETH has centralized governance! SOL has decentralized governance! We have covered four decentralization metrics so far & the score is 2-2. It is up to you to decide what metrics you prioritize over others There are also more decentralization metrics that I did not include here, but I would consider these to be the most important, excluding permissioned & centralized design features, which fortunatly neither ETH nor SOL have, so it was not relevant to include here In absolute technical terms, ETH is more decentralized at present. I will go even further & say that ETH is technically the most decentralized blockchain. Even if SOL is more decentralized, politically speaking However, projecting that out into the future, I am confident that SOL will eventually overtake ETH in all decentralization metrics The primary reason for this assessment is the difference in the two underlying scaling roadmaps. That is because, compared to SOL, ETH is not scaling its L1 meaningfully at all! How L1 scaling impacts decentralization: The more the L1 scales, the higher the node requirements become; however, the more the L1 scales, the more useful it also becomes This usefulness or utility, which comes from scale, brings with it massive economic benefits in the form of fees Fees are what will ultimately pay for the majority of security, scarcity & decentralization we expect from blockchain technology This means that the ideal blockchain design must strike a balance between these two levers. Thereby, in the process, maximizing both decentralization & utility. Because going too far in either extreme is detrimental to both, due to positive & negative feedback loops This is how ETH is hurting decentralization in the name of decentralization, a tragic irony... The "ETH perspective" represents an overly simplistic understanding of decentralization, where they think low node requirements = decentralization When you reason in a vacuum as an engineer, this is true. It is, however, absolutely false when you place a blockchain into the real world & account for economics, incentives, & politics When in reality, by temporarily taking off your engineer's hat & putting on the hat of a social scientist & economist. It becomes abundantly clear that SOL, over the long term, is taking a more decentralized approach. By not sacrificing utility on the altar of decentralization & losing both in the process A good blockchain designer understands there is a middle way Conclusion Is SOL perfect? Absolutely not; however, it is still significantly better than ETH in the long run in every single way, including decentralization & utility! The classic blockchain trilemma is outdated due to advances in scaling tech; we have now far exceeded it, as Vitalik also originally predicted when he first coined the term It is a shame that Vitalik now holds the opposite point of view, which is partially why ETH chose the "L2 scaling" path, an uncompetitive solution when L2s take the majority of fees. Allowing SOL to eventually overtake ETH's security budget! That is how ETH exceeded the decentralization of BTC, so that is also how SOL will exceed the decentralization metrics of ETH in the near future SOL already has a lion's share of all crypto revenue, as the security budget funding ratio between inflation & revenue flips, so will the combined security budget of SOL flip that of ETH! SOL's relative price to ETH doubling will also do the job of making SOL the new leader in security & eventually also decentralization SOL already has way more capacity, while being cheaper & faster. Because of this, it will also be the most decentralized & secure in the long run When the security budget finally flips, all non-scalable chains will have no legs left to stand on! 🦕☄️

NEW: @Bybit_Official HACKER, ALLEGEDLY NORTH KOREA'S LAZARUS GROUP, NOW HOLDS ~0.42% OF THE TOTAL SUPPLY OF $ETH

DO NOT RETALIATE AND YOU WILL BE REWARDED

"Solana is centralized" @Snowden #Solana

The best economic security protocols are on @solana

Dear WLFI Community, We are thrilled to announce a transformative initiative that marks a significant milestone in our journey together. World Liberty Financial (WLFI) is proud to unveil the Macro Strategy, our strategic token reserve designed to bolster leading projects like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other cryptocurrencies that are at the forefront of reshaping global finance. Purpose of the Macro Strategy The Macro Strategy will serve as a robust financial backbone for WLFI, enabling us to: Enhance Stability: By diversifying our holdings across a spectrum of tokenized assets, we aim to mitigate market volatility and ensure a resilient financial ecosystem. Foster Growth: The reserve will empower us to invest in innovative projects, support ecosystem development, and seize emerging opportunities within the DeFi landscape. Build Trust: A well-capitalized reserve underscores our commitment to transparency and long-term sustainability, reinforcing confidence among our community and stakeholders. Strategic Partnerships with Traditional Financial Institutions In alignment with our mission to bridge traditional finance and decentralized finance, we are actively engaging with esteemed financial institutions to contribute tokenized assets to our reserve. These collaborations offer mutual benefits: Public Blockchain Visibility: Contributed assets will be held in WLFI's publicly accessible wallet, providing institutions with transparent exposure to the crypto community. Innovative Marketing Opportunities: Through strategic initiatives, institutions can directly engage with our vibrant community, showcasing their commitment to innovation. Joint PR and Branding Efforts: Collaborative marketing campaigns will highlight these partnerships, positioning participating institutions at the forefront of the evolving financial landscape. A Call to Our Community We believe that the strength of WLFI lies in our dynamic and engaged community. Your support and active participation are crucial as we embark on this transformative journey. A comprehensive proposal detailing the Macro Strategy will be available on our governance forum shortly. We encourage you to review the proposal, provide feedback, and share your insights to help shape this historic plan. If you or your organization see potential for alignment with our vision, please reach out to us at reserve@worldlibertyfinancial.com. This initiative is more than just a strategic move; it is a testament to our unwavering dedication to innovation, collaboration, and the empowerment of our community. Together, we are building a legacy that bridges the worlds of traditional and decentralized finance, setting new standards for the industry. Thank you for being an integral part of the WLFI journey. The future is bright, and it is ours to create. Warm regards, The World Liberty Financial Team

Putting things in perspective: at current prices, NEAR spends around $150m per year to secure its network. What exactly is it securing? - $225m in stablecoins - $93m in TVL - $2.7M in annualized fees I studied physics, so I'm no economist but that looks a lot like overspending to me. Reducing that amount seems more than reasonable: I'm FOR the proposal.

AWS down and 90% of crypto is down Decentralization is a meme

We need a revolution in Ethereum marketing. The gap between the common understanding of Ethereum and its potential is staggering. We need unapologetic AMBITION in marketing. Ethereum is not simply a "smart contract platform" it is the WORLD COMPUTER — it is the platform upon which we can build a Sci-Fi civilization of the future. Digital money/gold, memecoins, digital NASDAQ, stablecoins — all of these things are subcategories of a World Computer. All of these things will be consumed by a World Computer. And these subcategories are just the start. The ultimate vision is for ALL civilizational structures to be re-imagined and re-built for the 21st century on this platform. New systems for Science, Media, Journalism, Finance & Economics, and ultimately Governance itself. It's not just time for a revolution in money, it's time for a revolution in EVERYTHING. People go work at Elon's companies because they're ambitious as hell. No one wants to work on B2B SAAS, they want to go to fckin Mars. We should stop worrying about attracting memecoin volume (I do like memecoins tho tbh), and instead we should aim at REBUILDING CIVILIZATION AND SAVING THE WORLD. Ethereum marketing should reflect this vision. It should appear at least 50% INSANE, because when I think of vision which I see, it IS insane. But the people cannot SEE it. This is why I do diagrams in my videos. People need to SEE the vision.