why on earth? because it’s obviously wrong. real or synthetic.
i get why “no real child, no real harm” sounds tidy. but it’s wrong, and it’s risky.
children aren’t a commodity. they’re a class we protect with bright lines. when we eroticize childhood, even in pixels, we don’t stay in a harmless sandbox. we thin the boundary that keeps real kids safe. norms matter. we outlaw some things not because atoms suffer, but because the message they send corrodes the guardrails around the vulnerable.
and markets follow attention. if ai can crank out infinite fake child porn, you don’t erase demand. you inflate it. you build communities, habits, and scripts that groom the consumer. you hand people a practice space that lowers inhibition and raises appetite. a rule that says “it’s fine if no child was used” becomes a gateway, not a firewall.
there’s also the enforcement mess. synthetic content is already hard to tell from real. flood the zone with fakes and you bury needles in haystacks. investigators and courts waste time sorting what’s “merely” synthetic while real victims wait. a bright line ban preserves scarce resources for the cases that matter most.
and there’s dignity harm. even if no specific child is depicted, the target of the sexualization is a group that cannot consent. we already get this. we don’t allow child sex dolls, not because silicone has rights, but because of what the object trains in the user when a defenseless group is at stake.
the lab grown diamond analogy misses the point. diamonds don’t have rights, and wanting a diamond doesn’t orient you toward violating a person. here the desire is inherently predatory. the spillover lands on actual children, now and later. we already regulate speech and simulacra when they operate as instruments of risk.
i’m for compassion toward people with dangerous urges. offer treatment, privacy, and help. but compassion isn’t permission. harm isn’t only the moment a camera clicks. it’s what we choose to normalize, what we train ourselves to want, and what burdens we dump on the systems meant to protect the defenseless.
so i draw the line here. no ai for child porn, period. not because pixels feel pain, but because children do.
if you don’t see why it’s obviously wrong, your morale compass is askew and you need to reflect.