In the interest of objectivity I will preface the below article with the following: I am in love with both of these women. That being said, there has been an incredible volume of discourse on the timeline surrounding the two of them. Sabrina– hot but unfuckable. Sydney– hot but retarded.
There has however been no formal comparison of these two pop culture succubi to determine conclusively both if they are attractive and if so which is more attractive than the other. I will therefore objectively assess.
We start with the face. Which foid is more attractive? Per Samudrika texts, Sabrina’s positive canthal tilt signals high attractiveness and a submissive disposition. Her wide set eyes and interpupillary distance contrast her narrow zygomatic arch, a strong signifier of intellect. On top of this, her short philtrum (a fertility cue) pairs with a relatively soft jawline and obtuse mandibular angle, making for a 19th century submissive stock sort of appearance. Simultaneously, her shallow infraorbital foramen is a clear suggestion of emotional depth.
Sydney, on the other hand, features a neutral canthal tilt signalling a more stoic allure. Her comparatively close interpupillary distance align with a broad zygomatic arch, which Vedic analysis considers a leadership skull. Her long philtrum (primal mating signal) joins a sharp jawline and acute mandibular angle while her deep infraorbital foramen signals strength and sexual vitality.
Though facial structure is extremely important in first-glance attractiveness assessment, a holistic approach absolutely must take into account body composition. Carpenter sits at a compact and petite 5’0” frame with an excellent 0.65 waist-to-hip ratio. Tight hourglass. Could throw her like a javelin and marvel at her travel velocity. Her slight lumbar curve suits a laborious lifestyle; slender thighs and lean calf-to-thigh ratio as well as short femurs point to natural agility and nimbleness. A 34-24-34 bust with perky B cups and a tight peach buttocks are quite arousing. A narrow pelvic inlet and high prenatal T/E ratio does however point to potential birth complications. I would still have sex with her.
Sweeney… delightful breasts! Sydney stands at a 5’4” leggy structure with a 0.6 waist-to-hip ratio; wide birthing hips. Her deep lumbar arch further optimizes procreation, with long femurs and bulky calf-to-thigh ratio. Returning to the breasts, her 36-26-36 bust with maternal D cups is likely objectively attractive to most straight men. Her round slab butt, toned lower back, and wide pelvic inlet is a strong indicator of a healthy birth and child rearing. I would have sex with her too.
The final physical assessment between these two w*men is the feet. Per my analysis Sabrina’s elf-like feet are a size 6– dainty arches and overall delicateness clearly shown in her compact stride. Again per my hours of research I estimate the feet of Sydney to be a repulsive size 7.5. There are not many high definition images of these feet– should any readers have them please provide to me privately so I can further research.
Physical features are by and far the most important in assessing attractiveness of a woman. Both of these women, subjectively and objectively are no doubt at the upper echelon in this category. A little bit of everything on either side. Sabrina has her petite elfish allure with a hint of malevolence behind the eyes, certain to attract a specific type of man (all men). Sweeney has an innocence to her smile and gratuitous breasts, certain to attract a different specific type of man (all men).
What really ends up separating these two women outside of physical features is ancestral genealogy. Sabrina’s heritage traces back to Pennsylvania Dutch and German ancestry. Records indicate her family settled in Quakertown around the early 18th century. American. Historical data of this genealogical subset suggests a lifestyle of relative stability and a modest average of 50 acres in land ownership records – all influencing a genetic profile emphasizing aesthetic refinement as opposed to physical ruggedness. Delicate facial symmetry and lighter pigmentation. Soft nobility. Not quite royalty, not quite peasant DNA.
Sydney’s ancestry combines English and Irish influences, with an unconfirmed Native American aspect, thought cranial structure experts could certainly confirm this upon a cursory measurement. Her family originates in Spokane, WA– certainly impacting the subtle sadness behind her beautiful eyes. Genetic admixture estimates suggest a 60% Northern European base with the remainder being 30% Irish Celtic and 10% indeterminate Native American input. This mix aligns with frontier survivalists, with land deeds from the 1800s showing transient holdings (10-20 acres) which indicates a heritage shaped by adaptability and a robust skeletal structure (as previously described).
We must go deeper. What separates these women, molecularly? What is the composition of your DNA sequence and will it make me want to have sex with you? Based on proxy data from similar Euro-descent individuals Carpenter shows a mitochondrial haplogroup H1 with a fragile genetic thread. Her estimated prenatal testosterone to estrogen (T/E) ratio, inferred from digit ratio (2D:4D) studies on related phenotypes suggests a moderately high testosterone influence, potentially yielding spirited offspring with 60% likelihood of high energy traits. However, as previously discussed, her narrow pelvic inlet (approx. 10.5cm transverse diameter) and lower bone density indicate a 40% risk of complicated gestation. This makes me want to have sex with her whenever I see her dressed up like a pin up model.
Sweeney’s genetic analysis points to a mitochondrial haplogroup U5 with a mongrel strength profile. Her estimated prenatal T/E ratio of 0.85 reflects a lower testosterone impact, favoring calm progeny with a 75% probability of docile temperament. Her wide pelvic inlet with an estimated 12.5cm transverse diameter and higher bone density suggests a 90% gestation success rate. This makes me want to have sex with her whenever I see her doing an advertisement.
But what do the stars say?
Sabrina Carpenter, born May 11, 1999, places her Sun in Taurus (19°), a fixed earth sign, with a rising sign likely Virgo (based on Lehigh Valley, PA, sunrise data). Her natal chart, calculated via Astrostyle, shows a stellium in the 2nd house (values, self-worth), enhancing a sensual, stable allure with Venus in Gemini (8°) adding a playful edge– suggesting a 70% compatibility with grounded, tactile partners.
Sydney Sweeney’s astrological mapping, with a birth date of September 12, 1997, positions her Sun in Virgo (20°), a mutable earth sign, with a rising sign possibly Sagittarius (per Spokane, WA, data). Her natal chart, per Astrostyle estimates, features a strong 5th house (creativity, romance) influence, with Mercury in Libra (15°) driving a dual-natured charm– indicating a 65% likelihood of unpredictable, intellectual attraction.
Both charts lack precise ascendant confirmation due to unverified birth times, but planetary aspects (e.g., Mars in Cancer for Sabrina, Jupiter in Aquarius for Sydney) amplify their respective earthy and chaotic pulls.
Both charts indicate that in the near future these women will enter my life and the three of us will live together forever in a loving relationship.
Adding all of this information together we get a clear picture of both women. In fact I am picturing both of them, nude, right now.
Sydney was destined from birth to be a simple sexy down to earth unexpectedly hot girl who evokes a primal “we must have fifteen children” sentiment in all heterosexual men. Her overall positive and laid back demeanor makes her conclusively marriage material, which cannot be said for Sabrina.
Sabrina was destined from birth to be the short feisty cunning succubus who has a much more directed sexuality both in appearance and personality, evoking a primal “I will have sex with you at your request” sentiment in all heterosexual men.
I conclude with this. If a bunch of scientists got together and made a woman in a lab with the express goal of getting as many guys to “want” to bang her as possible, they would create Sabrina Carpenter. When mother nature does the same thing, it creates Sydney Sweeney.
As a gay man, I couldn’t care less.