Of course, you hate RWAs.
You're a three-cycle bagholder who apes into everything shiny and gets burned. You read one critique of an institutional thesis on tokenized assets. You'll keep getting rugged on pump fun, cycling your meager gains until you bleed out on NFT PvP on Abstract. You'll scream under every post about RWAs pushing boundaries, about how RWAs are saturated, and it was a brief narrative in 2024. This will last until the bear, and then you'll move on to say that L2s are dead and fragmentation killed everything.
"Well, RWAs are just governments trying to dox all our wall-"
You listened to one All-in podcast where an off-the-cuff remark about tokenization is now your whole personality. But you know what? I listened, too, and they weren't serious. Do you have an actual original critique? Or is this some prolonged MiCA fud you read from 0xcheesburger 2 years ago? Is this your persona? Dying on a hill because you chronically misunderstood complex topics boiled down to a blanket statement?
The real tragedy of the commons is that people listen to you. You see, when Blackrock moves their entire holdings on-chain, and everyone is comfortable and winning beyond anything they can imagine today, you'll still be commenting "CA?" under washed-out KOLs Tweets. Only then will you understand that on-chain assets aren't about KYCs or bragging rights -- it's about upgrading the existing investment framework and making sure it's accessible to everyone. Then you'll realize two undeniable truths: one, that the RWA revolution actually solves problems that no amount of apeing floors, topblasting, or spamming "mass adoption is coming" could solve; and two, all the margin you wasted adding to your shorts could have set you up generationally in low volatility real estate asset yields.
Of course you hate Solana
You're a fourth year bagholder. You just finished readin' some antiquated triangle drawn on a blog post -- the "blockchain trilemma" probably. You're gonna be convinced of that 'til next month when you get to David Hoffman, and then you're gonna be talkin' about how the Etherean Economy is not for unserious plebonians but for B2B sales to Larry Fink's not even fully bald head. That's gonna last until next year -- you're gonna be in here regurgitating Justin Drake, talkin' about, you know, the Purge, the Merge, the Splurge and the Scourge
> "Well, as a matter of fact, I won't, because L2s ar --
are Ethereum -- 'L2s are Ethereum.' You got that from Bankless, 'Why ETH Will Giga Send 100,000x as an Ultrasound Reserve Asset of the Internet,' Episode 98, right? Yeah, I watched that too. Were you gonna plagiarize the whole thing for us? Do you have any thoughts of your own on this matter? Or do you...is that your thing? You come into Twitter. You read some overly complex universal intersubjective whitepaper and a few Vitalik blog posts and then pretend...you pawn it off as your own idea just to impress some EF researchers and embarrass your father? See the sad thing about a guy like you is in 50 years you're gonna start doin' some thinkin' on your own and you're gonna come up with the fact that there are two certainties in life. One: increase bandwidth, reduce latency. And two: You dropped a hundred and fifty grand on useless gas and bridging you coulda' 10,000x'd in the trenches