This, and more this, the 32 ETH are an unfortunate tech debt, but the very *only* reason L1 needs home stakers is that we don't know any other way to achieve censor resistance. Even with inclusion lists, if we lose the 10% or so home stakers it's hard to argue that we get CR
This is not true. We always wanted home stakers because of censorship resistance.
What is true is that not supporting in protocol delegation and having a fixed deposit size was due to needing large committees for execution sharding. But this has nothing to do with home stakers.