Horrible advice for 99% of founders out there.
Let me explain why -
You want to be default alive. The founding team should be able to build the product and go to market with very little or no capital.
Yes, sure you can hire an engineer with equity instead of salary but let’s be real that person will never be as fired up as a co-founder. When you're just starting out, half the battle is keeping the whole squad pumped up and motivated.
The only way this works for you is if you already have capital to hire engineers or are well connected / charismatic enough who can sweet-talk VCs to give you money without an MVP
Who do you think will win?
The team where all the founders are non-technical and trying to figure out how to add a button or the team where the technical cofounder is shipping constantly and the non-technical one is out there hustling sales and cooking up marketing schemes?
The only reason in todays age to not have a technical founder is pure greed / reluctance to share the pie or incapability to make others believe in the idea. You shouldn’t start a startup in either case.
"You need a technical co-founder" is outdated advice for startups
Product Hunt and Calendly didn't have technical co-founders
Our startup hit 40,000+ users without a technical co-founder, here's what I've realized: