A man and his friend walked into a bar.
"So," the first man said, swirling his drink, "I just had the most enlightening conversation. Apparently, the future of finance is all about being... transparently controllable."
His friend choked on his beer. "Transparently controllable? You mean, like, they can see everything you do, but they can also stop you from doing it?"
"Precisely!" the first man beamed. "But don't worry, you can verify that they stopped you! And you don't even have to show them your ID before they decide to pull the plug. It's a truly free market, in the sense that they're free to do whatever they want with your funds, and you're free to verify it happened."
The friend stared into the bottom of his glass. "So, it's like a really fancy, complicated version of putting all your money under your mattress, except someone else holds the mattress, and they can decide to light it on fire, but you get a perfectly verifiable receipt of the ashes?"
"Exactly!" the first man clapped him on the back. "And the best part? The ability to prevent anyone from messing with your money? Apparently, that's 'the least interesting property to optimise for.'"
The friend just slowly slid off his stool, muttering, "I think I need a different bar."
Seeing a lot of dogmatic FUD that CLOBs can't run on centralized sequencers bc they don't have censorship resistance.
Ideally a single platform could have everything, but ultimately we have to make tradeoffs in design and optimizing for latency, verifiability, and permissionlessness (which you can achieve with a centralized sequencer) seem more important to me than CR (which you lose).
Latency makes the exchange more efficient
Verifiability makes the exchange non-custodial and prevents cheating
Permissionlessness ensures there's no need to KYC and that anyone can list new assets (many ppl use Hyperliquid simply bc there's no KYC)
A lack of censorship resistance means the sequencer can still cheat in limited ways that can screw over users but if the exchange is transparent users can observe this and leave the platform making it a -EV move by the operator, and there are ways of strengthening the CR via the L1 like inboxes to limit the maximum downside of censorship.
So TL;DR, centralized sequencers seem to make good tradeoffs for building a decentralized exchange.
Please help me find flaws in my line of thinking. Ultimately the market will decide