I sit on a lot of hospital & system committees these days, & even co-chair one of them.
As a white, straight, middle aged male I play my cards very close to my chest & typically play the role of quiet, tireless workhorse, and, when it’s called for, facilitator & consensus-builder. It’s something I do well.
This allows me a lot of leeway to sit back and surreptitiously observe contemporary office politics as they exist in typical large US medical systems today.
Some observations:
Medicine these days seems currently utterly awash in women, & of those women it’s overwhelmingly openly liberal white women (AWFLs I’ve heard them called).
They are typically quite fearlessly vocal about their leftist politics, ostentatiously sign their emails with practically extraneous but politically significant pronouns & BLM affinity statements, & increasingly enjoy making snide side comments about “Trump” at office meetings whenever they feel they can get away with it.
These women will also be the first to claim “harm” & also comically claim “oppressed” status at the first sign of even the slightest whiff of dissension (I have specific examples of this I will not share here due to my anon status).
“DEI” is, of course, also extremely fashionable in medicine, at least where I operate.
A few observations about that. So, I’ve noticed multiple clinicians in my system who have taken on the mantle of doing DEI consulting within our system, & they seem to fall into three different categories:
1) “the politically cynical DEI consultant”: these are typically younger, highly ambitious Asian women from upwardly mobile, often privileged families who see “DEI” as a stepping stone towards career success. Because they despise Republicans (and *hate* Trump) they throw themselves into the most awful aspects of it, “whiteness studies,” overt neo-Marxism, “we need present racism to fight past racism,” etc. Typically midwits relative to their earned credentials.
2) “the capable yet reluctant DEI consultants”: these are almost always black women, typically middle aged with often impressive careers & accomplishments elsewhere in the system. I’ve heard a couple of them do “DEI” presentations & they seem to carefully craft their offerings to avoid the overly neo-Marxist or hate-whitey aspects, e.g. they seem to be trying to do “DEI without the E.” I often wonder what motivates them, & I often am quietly applauding their efforts to actually try & bring some rationality & sanity to the discussion (although I tend to think it’s a bit futile). Definitely the most sympathetic of the group.
3) “The midwit career DEI consultants”: these are a mix. I’ve seen older, middle aged black men with unimpressive careers, I’ve seen young black women who have no business in medicine in this role. I’ve also see lots of relatively empty-headed younger white women & “LGBTQIASL++etc” men as well. For this group, it simply seems to serve as a busy-work, jobs program of sorts for them.
Anyways, just some observations for today….