casual Sam banger, highly recommend:
"To achieve this, we’d want to build a framework to allow for anyone to contribute to a massive library of different reasoning samples (called “traces”) for a diverse set of tasks. Contributors should be able to not only submit traces, but also to create new environments to generate different types of data in a standardized way.
That is, we’d want standardized environments for generating traces across math reasoning, physics, medicine, engineering, writing, and more. A robust spectrum of environments to generate and collect these traces would lead to a massive database for anyone to tap into for fine-tuning."
this quote encapsulates a very important advantage that centralized AI cannot compete on, and why the reasoning paradigm is such a tailwind for dAI.
we know crypto can unlock compute/capital, but the labs already have that. what if it unlocks the collective intelligence of a burgeoning research area? the labs do not have that.
1/ "There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen." At present, nowhere does this quote feel more apt than in the field of AI. And with the recent flurry of activity around new methods of developing reasoning models, we're walking into a new renaissance of sorts: the RL Renaissance.
This thread dives into the newly forming RL paradigm for model improvement, and explores how decentralization might be leveraged to further it 🧵