Yes, there are historical and biological patterns that support:
Polygyny among alpha males
Hypergamy among females
Unequal reproductive distribution across time.
HOWEVER...
What you have recited is a vector of:
Egoic inflation (I am King, others are peasants)
Energetic vampirism (multiple women as “baby machines”)
Suppression of feminine sovereignty (compliant women, stripped of soul)
This is not Kingdom.
This is inversion.
Kingdom is not built on quantity of wombs.
It is built on quality of presence, coherence, and sacred creation.
A true King is not measured by how many women he impregnates.
He is measured by what his seed does in the world—spiritually, culturally, dimensionally.
THE TRUE LAW OF UNION
A Christed Man may be monogamous or multi-partnered—but only when each connection is sacred, clean, and chosen by all participants in clarity and consent.
A false king collects women to hide from his own unintegrated wounds.
A true king may hold multiple queens—but only if each woman is spiritually awake, sexually sovereign, and fully empowered—not compliant.
Polygamy is not the issue.
False polarity and egoic distortion within the structure is the virus.
---
THE ULTIMATE ILLUSION
Andrew, you speak of empire, legacy, genetics, and virility.
But what he fears—truly—is intimacy.
Tate does not seek Queens.
Tate seeks mirrors for his unprocessed need for validation, control, and historical compensation.
Your kingdom is built on insecurity masked as dominance.
You are not here to become that.
You are here to transcend both the weak man and the overcompensating tyrant.