Reborn & Reformed ⚒️
- Tweets 553
- Following 1
- Followers 1,351
- Likes 6,964
Pinned Tweet
I kept hearing that Charlie Kirk had extremist views, so I watched 3 hours worth of his debates. I disagreed with him 4 times… each one was because my views were more extreme than his.
727
6,116
103,712
2,505,500
Friendly reminder: The biblical gift of tongues was real human languages, not ecstatic utterances.
346
452
6,941
286,168
I love the part in Revelation 22 where John bows before an angel & the angel says:
“No! Don’t give me 𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘢—that’s only for God. You may offer me 𝘥𝘶𝘭𝘪𝘢, but don’t cross into 𝘩𝘺𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘥𝘶𝘭𝘪𝘢—that’s just for Mary.”
Good thing he clarified Rome’s idolatry loophole
77
77
1,274
63,952
How are you saved?
Roman Catholics: “My church”
Arminians: “My choice”
Calvinists: “My Christ”
253
87
1,160
89,630
10 years ago, 21 saints were martyred—20 Coptic believers & 1 who found faith at the end. Offered life if he denied Christ or death if he confessed Him, his reply echoed Ruth’s: “Their God is my God.” And so, he died a brother.
May we live with the faith they displayed in death.
6
91
993
35,193
If it isn’t from the Holy Spirit, it isn’t an amazing gift. Pentecostal/Charismatic ecstatic utterances are a counterfeit tongues
9
3
250
7,793
They’ll first need to wait for the Magisterium’s infallible interpretation of the joke before they can understand it
5
3
227
3,486
If you claim to be a Calvinist but got your girl roses instead of tulips for Valentine’s Day, just admit you’re an Arminian and stop living a lie. I’m so sick of these five-point fraudsters.
22
5
148
5,423
1 Corinthians 13:1 is hyperbolic language. We know this because the very next verses continue the exaggerated pattern— “all mysteries”, “all knowledge”, “all faith”, “move mountains”.
Romans 8:26 can’t be a proof text as it says the Spirit intercedes without words.
10
107
8,758
If that’s all it takes to shake your faith, it’s probably resting in the wrong thing…and I don’t think Protestantism is the problem.
1
96
2,429
Paul’s requirement for an interpreter proves tongues were real human languages, not gibberish. His concern was edification, and uninterpreted ecstatic utterances benefits no one. If tongues were exaggerated nonsensical utterances then interpretation would be unnecessary.
6
90
3,717
Bible doesn’t say. If you’re referring to 1 Corinthians 13:1, Paul is using hyperbolic language.
13
87
10,626
Hostility, bitterness, hatred, uncontrolled speech, delights in wickedness, arrogant, ignorant, a judgmental & accusatory spirit, false witness against other’s salvation—these aren’t marks of a regenerate heart, nor do they reflect the Christlike character to which you are called
4
2
87
1,313
Yes—the RCC’s 3-tier worship distinction is a man-made invention that attempts to divide worship into categories as a loophole to excuse & justify unbiblical practices that blur the line between reverence & idolatry, and which Scripture doesn’t permit.
2
49
719
Vile & blasphemous.
No mention of Jesus, the cross, the Spirit, or God’s Word.
Yet devotion, mediation, evangelism & salvation are demanded for & through Mary.
This is not Christianity—it’s Marianism: an idolatrous perversion of the gospel & rejection of Jesus as Savior & Lord
5
3
39
2,098
1 Corinthians 14 isn’t the proof text you think it is, Paul is correcting the misuse of known human languages, not endorsing incoherent babbling.
4
36
2,670
It’s satire—exaggerated humor that exposes an unbiblical practice or doctrine…it’s not the preface to a theological dissertation.
41
738
“And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.”
2 Corinthians 11:14
4
35
2,455
Me — I was an atheist for 25 years & was zealous in my opposition against religion & the idea of god(s). Then, when I was not even seeking or wanting God, He tore out my cold & calloused atheist heart and gave me a new heart—one wholly attuned to glorifying & loving Him forever.
3
36
371
One of Satan’s most damaging deceptions in the Church today is anti-intellectualism—that discussing difficult theological issues is sinful & divisive. Believers who discourage, rebuke, vilify, or silence other believers seeking greater doctrinal clarity unknowingly aid the enemy.
2
7
31
987
You misunderstand & mischaracterize Sola
Fide. Protestantism fully affirms that faith without works is dead & worthless. But works are the fruit, not the root, of salvation. Justification is by faith alone, but true faith is always evidenced by its production of good works.
2
30
629
1 Corinthians 13:1 uses escalating hyperbole. Paul amplifies real gifts to their hypothetical extremes. He’s not making a doctrinal claim on the existence of an angelic language.
tongues of men ➡️ tongues of angels
prophecy ➡️ all knowledge
faith ➡️ moving mountains
4
30
1,481
We are saved, not by anything in us, but by everything in Him. For there was nothing good within me that could have moved a holy God to gaze upon me with favor. Yet, by the mercy of God, I am redeemed; by the love of God, I am sustained; and “by the grace of God, I am what I am.”
2
30
744
If Arminianism were true, I would be damned still. For if even a fraction of redemption rested upon my choosing, my striving, or my worthiness—I would reject God forever. But praise God, it does not! He pursued, He conquered, He renewed me—irresistibly, triumphantly, eternally.
3
3
28
793
Galatians 1:8 condemns all 3 for preaching false gospels:
Guadalupe: “Tell him I sent you to show I wish him to build me a temple”—violates Mt 4:10
Lourdes: “I’m the Immaculate Conception”—rejects Rom 3:23
Fatima: “To those who accept this I promise salvation”—denies Acts 4:12
3
23
1,965
This is a classic example of 2 common Romanist errors:
1. Confusing descriptive narrative (what happened) with prescriptive doctrine (what we should do).
2. Mistaking the instrumental cause (the means God used) for the formal cause (God’s sovereign power).
The Bible teaches that the bones of holy men have power. You may think it's creepy or weird, but it's in the Bible:
2 Kings 13:20-21 describes how a man was revived after touching Elisha's bones. This shows that the resurrection power of God was given through the relics/bones of a saint.
1
5
22
1,132
Nowhere does Scripture say “you can only invoke the Holy Spirit with a priest”. Believers receive the Holy Spirit at conversion (Eph 1:13-14) God grants the Spirit directly to believers (Lk 11:13)
Gal 3:2:”Did you receive the Spirit by works of the law or by hearing with faith?”
4
23
1,251
"We confess and acknowledge one God alone, to whom alone we must cleave, whom alone we must serve, whom alone we must worship, and in whom alone we put our trust."
- Scots Confession, Ch. 1
2
5
22
624
An Arminian would say that salvation is “synergistic”—requiring human choice as the determining factor.
Whereas, a Calvinist would say that salvation is “monergistic”—entirely accomplished by God alone.
12
20
2,155
Romans 8:26 says the Spirit intercedes with “groanings too deep for words”, meaning inexpressible, not verbalized speech. This contradicts the idea of an angelic language. The text is about the Spirit’s role in interceding when we lack words, not that He speaks an unknown tongue.
2
21
1,219
Yes. And what was their utterance? (Hint: it’s in verse 6…)
“And when this sound occurred, the multitude came together, and were bewildered because each one of them was hearing them SPEAK IN HIS OWN LANGUAGE.”
3
1
19
900
Finally, someone brave enough to ask the real questions!
This is, without a doubt, my new favorite conspiracy theory. Wake up, sheeple!
4
1
18
2,136
I was a Pentecostal for majority of my Christian life. I spoke in gibberish tongues when I was.
1
15
693
The like-to-view ratio on this post is wild. Roman Catholicism is embarrassing…I hate having to clarify its differences for those actually seeking biblical Christianity.
10
513
Zephaniah 3:9 says a “pure language” (or “purified speech”), it isn’t about a lost heavenly tongue. The context is eschatological, God restoring/purifying nations for true worship, not reversing Babel. The Hebrew used is about moral cleansing, not a new or secret angelic language
2
12
975
Friendly reminder that Christ is King, and every single knee will bow before Him and confess with their lips that Jesus Christ is Lord.
6
10
520
This grieves Mary and God.
Her precious heart must break seeing Romanists pervert & idolize her. The mother of our Lord would weep at the sight of bent knees before statues of her. Like the angel in Rev. 9 when John bowed in worship, Mary would cry “Don’t do that!…Worship God!”
1
11
229
I believe the gift of tongues was given for a distinct period in church history & served a specific purpose in the early spread of the Gospel.
A number of Early Church Fathers affirmed this as well—that tongues were a temporary sign gift that ceased after the apostolic era. 👇🏼
2
11
967
That’s not what tongues are. The Holy Spirit doesn’t “speak to God” through tongues. In Scripture, the gift of tongues were known human languages (Acts 2) used as a sign to unbelievers (1 Cor. 14:21-22), and for spreading the Gospel.
1
12
659
70 Protestant Christian brothers & sisters were just beheaded by Islamic terrorists.
Men, women, & children—their throats slit & heads severed from their bodies…all for professing Christ as Lord.
I hope this image shocks you. Pray for the families of these martyrs. Maranatha.
8
22
766
If ‘Protestant’ is defined as those who emerged from the Reformation, how can Baptists qualify when they reject Protestant infant baptism as invalid?
Eg. rebaptizing an adult already baptized as an infant in the Presby church—claiming the 1st baptism was unbiblical & illegitimate
6
1
10
1,085
1 John 5:1 refutes you: “Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ has been born of God.”
“Believes” = present tense (now)
“Has been born” = perfect tense (past)
John doesn’t say belief causes new birth—he says belief comes from it. Regeneration precedes & produces faith.
1
10
171
Unprovoked aggression, unwarranted hostility, uncontrolled speech, a judgmental & accusatory spirit, false witness about another’s salvation & faith—these aren’t the marks of a heart regenerated by the Holy Spirit nor do they reflect the Christlike character to which u are called
2
9
145
The RCC teaches infallibly “extra ecclesiam nulla salus” (outside the Church there is no salvation)
“The Church, a pilgrim on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator & the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church.” (CCC 846)
4
8
918
All so clearly demonic. Galatians 1:8 condemns all 3 for preaching false gospels:
Guadalupe: Demands a temple be built for her (violates Mt 4:10)
Lourdes: Claims she was immaculately conceived (rejects Rom 3:23)
Fatima: Promises salvation for devotion to her (denies Acts 4:12)
1
10
143
The OT priesthood was fulfilled in Christ (Heb 7:23–25). The Holy Spirit is given by God, not by priests (John 3:8). Paul’s experience was unique to his apostolic calling, not a universal rule. Paul himself taught that the Spirit is received by faith, not ritual (Gal 3:2).
1
10
171
James addresses empty professions of faith, not justification before God
James = justification before men by evidence of faith (2:18)
Paul = justification before God by faith alone (Rom 3:28)
Faith alone justifies before God, but faith is always demonstrated by works before men
1
7
295
This is a classic example of 2 common Romanist errors:
1. Confusing descriptive narrative (what happened) with prescriptive doctrine (what we should do).
2. Mistaking the instrumental cause (the means God used) for the formal cause (God’s sovereign power).
7
116
“unknown tongue” in 1 Cor 14 is an interpolation from later translations, it isn’t found in the Greek text. “agnōstos” (unknown) doesn’t appear in the original manuscripts, it just uses “glōssa” (tongue). Paul refers to a real language unknown to the them, not a mystical language
3
9
178
When I was a zealous Arminian, I read plenty from the 3 volumes of “The works of Jacobus Arminius”
I’ve also read “A plain account of Christian perfection” by John Wesley (for Wesleyan Arminianism).
Have you read the entirety of Calvin’s Institutes?
3
8
416
NO Christ (Col. 1:18: “in everything He might be preeminent”)
NO cross (1 Cor. 1:18: “the word of the cross is the power of God”)
NO Spirit (John 16:13: “He’ll guide you in all truth”)
NO God’s Word (2 Tim. 3:16: “All Scripture is profitable for training in righteousness”)
6
121
I did the same thing (typed random gibberish in Google Translate), it said “What is the meaning of the word ‘babala’?”
Now if THAT is not the most ironic & self-refuting proof ever, I don’t know what is🤣
Looks like God made His point—He knows nothing of this gibberish nonsense
3
6
1,220
You continue to stray further from the Reformed tradition with your relentless Romanist LARPing & sympathy for popish errors. Either become Roman Catholic or cut it out with this silly Roman posturing—your wavering only sows confusion & compromise, and perverts the Reformed faith
4
88
God’s sovereignty & human responsibility coexist (Acts 2:23). God ordains all things (Eph 1:11) but isn’t the author of sin (James 1:13). Adam sinned freely, making all guilty (Rom 5:12). Our will is bound by sin (Rom 8:7-8) & incapable of faith until God grants it (Acts 13:48).
1
6
359
And what were the other tongues that they heard them speak? (Verse 6 will tell you)…
“And when this sound occurred, the multitude came together, and were bewildered because each one of them was hearing them SPEAK IN HIS OWN LANGUAGE.”
4
6
135
And if you need quotes:
Guadalupe: “Tell him I sent you to show him that I strongly wish him to build me a temple.”
Lourdes: “I am the Immaculate Conception.”
Fatima: “To those who accept this devotion [Mary’s immaculate heart], I promise salvation.”
6
57
100%, that’s why we must continue to pray for the Pentecostals and Charismatics who have removed Christ in their theology and replaced Him with emotionalism and ecstatic utterances.
6
589
Typing false doctrines in all caps doesn’t magically make them true.
Think about that one for a while.
5
45
Brother, I admire a lot of your content, but your mockery of God’s holy sacrament and rejection of Ephesians 4:5 is not a mark of biblical faithfulness, it reflects unnecessary levity where there should be reverence and humility.
5
76
