Jack of All Trades @Blockchair ⤶ Chief Troll Officer @Trollbox ⤶ Goodies: budget.day · privacy.watch · passport.store

nikzh@nikzh.com
Excited to launch privacy.watch — a tracker for leading privacy cryptos that ranks them by total shielded supply rather than plain market cap. Featuring @monero 🥇, @Zcash (3 shielded pools) 🥈, @zano_project 🥉, @PirateChain, and @litecoin (MWEB). More to come! 🔒
170
128
773
71,413
I have a strong feeling that this is the last time we see Bitcoin’s dominance level above 66%. From this point on it will fall, probably resulting in Bitcoin losing its first place within the next 5 years (long thread, 1/20)
147
187
761
(1/2) Ok, so what happened today on #Ethereum🦄: 1. At some point Ethereum developers introduced a change in the code that led today to a chain split starting from block 11234873 (07:08 UTC) 2. Those who haven’t upgraded (@Blockchair, @infura_io, some miners, and many others)…
53
270
683
Ethereum L2s can steal all user funds at any moment! ⚠️ Arbitrum One: "The Security Council can perform emergency upgrades directly through the UpgradeExecutor. Such an upgrade can be executed instantly without any delay. Theoretically, the Security Council can instantly upgrade the chain and steal user funds." Optimism: "The OP Mainnet rollup can be controlled and altered by a direct upgrade of the contracts: such an upgrade can be executed without delay and alter all rollup mechanisms, including stealing users’ funds." Loopring: "The system is operated by the Loopring multisig. It can instantly upgrade ExchangeV3’s implementation, potentially altering the functioning of the whole rollup, including stealing users’ funds." zkSync Era: "The Governor can also change the Verifier contract without any delay. As the Verifier contract is responsible for zkProof verification, the Governor can steal funds from the rollup by changing the Verifier into a malicious version." And these are just some excerpts from the "Upgradeability of Ethereum L2s" report. Existing L2s are not a scaling solution, they're a solution for banksters to take control over your coins. The very same applies to Bitcoin L2s such as custodial Lightning wallets and Liquid. And that's why they're afraid of L1 scaling: they want to be in control.
85
204
639
199,666
The average Bitcoin transaction fee is now $50 with 300.000 transactions waiting to be confirmed. This is beyond ridiculous and unusable. Historically, this is the point when people start running away to alternative blockchains en masse.
205
84
530
77,313
Bitcoin SV has just experienced a 18 block deep reorg — the largest since the launch — wiping out almost 10 hours worth of transactions. Be careful.
49
87
495
We're launching l2.watch🥷 — a full list of existing and upcoming L2s on Bitcoin! Currently listing 55 of them and constantly working on enriching the data! Also we'll be managing a Twitter List where you can follow all of them at once: nitter.app/i/lists/17701316892152…
86
102
501
183,907
Whoops! $BSV has experienced yet another reorg, this time 6 (six!) consecutive blocks were orphaned (#578640–578645), this chain included a 128 MB block #578644 🤦‍♂️ The network was basically stuck for 1.5 hours, and this shows that even 6 confirmations are not enough 🤷‍♂️
55
120
469
Ethereum L2s are poisoning Ethereum: the dominance is plummeting 📉, and the coin printer is back on 📈! Forget about the "ultrasound money" narrative 🦇🔊 1. All the existing corporate L2s are fully custodial: they have admin keys which allow to steal user funds at any time ("emergency councils" can upgrade contracts at any time). These L2s have nothing to do with the original premise of Ethereum: decentralization and permissionlessness. 2. Most users can't afford paying enormous fees on L1 and don't want to use custodial L2s. They migrate to other L1s (thus the decline in dominance), and Ethereum's security budget is drying out as they're now paying fees elsewhere. Another problem is that those who stay on L2s pay to L2s, not to L1 validators. L2s siphon fees off of L1. That's why Ethereum has already started to print new Ethers to stay secure. Not very "ultrasound". 3. The UX of having to constantly bridge your funds is a disaster. Liquidity fragmentation is a disaster. Normies won't be using that. Ethereum needs to scale on-chain. But, alas, corruption runs deep. Pocketing these L2 fees is a very lucrative business!
52
48
323
51,781
The security budget issue and the ⚡️ Bitcoin ⚡️ laser ⚡️ eyes ⚡️ totally ⚡️ ignoring ⚡️ it ⚡️ or ⚡️ calling ⚡️ it ⚡️ an ⚡️ attack
92
78
407
73,021
Ethereum is dying. All the major projects are moving to their own blockchains. Uniswap, Polymarket, and now ENS — they all use the EVM technology, but not Ethereum itself. There's no need for Ethereum anymore. Not scaling L1 was a fatal mistake.
JUST IN: ENS Labs, the company behind @ensdomains, is moving ahead with a plan to migrate the domain name service from Ethereum its own layer-2 network. @margauxnijkerk reports coindesk.com/tech/2024/11/11…
120
65
420
165,613
In my opinion, today’s consensus failure in #Ethereum🦄 shouldn’t be underestimated and should be considered as the most serious issue Ethereum has faced since the DAO debacle 4 years ago. An investigation is in order.
16
60
426
Cryptocurrencies are about setting everyone free, not making a few rich. Bitcoin was hijacked. Artificially limited throughput and lack of privacy are not native to Bitcoin. As always, @rogerkver talks about extremely important points the mainstream media is "not" aware of.
Roger Ver is facing life in prison for revealing how the US government worked secretly to subvert cryptocurrency and prevent economic freedom. More people should hear this story. (0:00) Roger Ver Facing Extradition (7:49) The Hijacking of Bitcoin (12:18) How the Government Tracks Your Every Transaction (26:26) Who Is Satoshi? (27:13) Why Ver Chooses to Speak Out (38:19) Ver’s Experience in a Spanish Prison Includes paid partnerships.
41
77
421
34,685
Nostr creator: "Lightning is a scam" 🤪
53
98
386
130,834
BlackRock: "There is no guarantee that Bitcoin's 21 million supply cap will not be changed." 🤷‍♂️ I've been saying this for years: by stopping Bitcoin from scaling its L1, they've created the security budget issue which they're going to solve with additional emission 🪄
JUST IN: $11.5 trillion asset manager BlackRock releases video explaining #Bitcoin.
83
60
400
80,888
Satoshi's vision for Bitcoin was lots of L1 transactions paying small fees (1-2 cents). He had no problems with 15 million txs a day (~50 MB blocks) in 2009! He understood adoption wouldn't happen overnight, so Moore's law would help. Maxis will try to hide this knowledge.
49
103
386
66,607
"The Internet of money should not cost 5 cents a transaction, it's kinda absurd" — this didn't age well for Ethereum 🤪
40
75
378
50,926
First, the Bitcoin Core cartel banned discussing alternative Bitcoin implementations, which were to scale Bitcoin. Now, they're banning discussing Bitcoin's privacy. Next, only discussing how to use custodial Lightning wallets will be allowed. Welcome to Bitcoin 2024! 📈
44
69
355
36,785
"Bitcoin" Magazine writes about people using "Bitcoin" 🤷‍♂️ The "magic" is that they're not using Bitcoin, they're using Wallet of "Satoshi" which underneath is a centralized Excel spreadsheet at best. People who try to convince everyone these kids are using Bitcoin are scammers.
Kids paying for Happy Meals with #Bitcoin in El Salvador Pure magic 🇸🇻 nitter.app/bitcoinisded/status/17…
72
46
332
120,537
Lots of Monero bros are in disbelief that a 51% attack by Qubic can happen 😕 Any PoW chain can be attacked. It doesn't matter how good your coin is: what matters is the security budget. Bitcoiners shouldn't gloat: Bitcoin might be next. Here's a brief history of 51% attacks:
31
55
354
37,224
$673k — Base made on its custodial L2 in one day − $2.5k — Base paid in L1 fees = $671.5k — Stolen from L1 validators and the security budget + increased $ETH issuance (i.e. stolen from all hodlers) L2 scaling on top of a crippled L1 is the largest attack ever on L1 security.
'Ethereum is too expensive' is a really bad take. Did you know the Base chain has made over $40m as an L2 already? Yesterday Base made $673k. How much did they pay Ethereum for that ? Less than $2,500. $2.5k in costs to settle an ENTIRE CHAIN worth of transactions - Base getting $670k in daily profit. Ethereum isn't expensive. Ethereum is cheap.
12
17
190
17,648
This is how I see those who own a whole #bitcoin nowadays 🌰
11
70
304
Satoshi was saying that Bitcoin was already capable of processing Visa scale transactions in.. May 2009. He mentioned Moore's Law, which still applies as of 2024. "We can't scale L1 and need L2s" is the biggest scam campaign ever to push ordinary users into custodial solutions.
My email correspondence with Satoshi in 2009-2011: mmalmi.github.io/satoshi/
30
81
316
76,597
YouTube vs. Bitcoin scaling 💅 Still think the Internets can't do better than 1 MB?
82
65
299
30,212
Taproot: the biggest upgrade to Bitcoin… no one needed? It’s been a month since Taproot was activated on the mainnet. So far the adoption rate is at laughable 0.15% and the total amount locked in P2TR is at whooping 301 BTC (50% of which is controlled by 17 addresses). (1/7)
67
68
284
Ethereum is down not because it switched from PoW to PoS, but because it moved away from scaling L1 in favor of fragmented custodial L2s.
FUN FACT: Ethereum is down 74% against Bitcoin since switching from PoW to PoS in 2022.
47
29
293
29,629
Ethereum is as toast as Bitcoin if this is accepted. The only proposed way to scale Ethereum is through corrupt centralized L2s. L1 sharding is not even mentioned anymore.
By popular demand, an updated roadmap diagram for 2023!
58
43
289
108,240
All these Lightning startups will be dissolving one by one as they're running out of venture money while not being able to gain any meaningful user traction over the last 9 years. Lightning is dead. Can somebody remind me what's the current plan to scale Bitcoin? 🤷‍♂️
102
43
289
40,224
As Bitcoin's security budget continues to diminish, I've decided to launch budget.day — a website with live charts dedicated to explaining-like-you're-five why Bitcoin will fail one day if this issue is not resolved. What you'll find: • What's the security budget issue and what could be achieved with a 51% attack; • How the budget is formed with subsidy (which is halved every 4 years) and fees (which still haven't formed the so-called "fee market"); • What can be done: good options like scaling Bitcoin, and bad options like breaking the 21 million coin cap which is already being proposed by some Bitcoin Core developers; • An overview of the common fallacies like "the hashrate is growing, so we're okay" and "Bitcoin's price will moon to $1M, so we're okay". H/t @jamesob and @Justin_Bons! Any suggestions are welcome!
103
91
334
37,883
Bitcoin Core hoped to create a fee market by limiting the block size, but instead ended up with a security budget issue. It's now clear in practice that users won't pay large fees. Bitcoin needs to plan its security under the assumption that the fee rate will remain at 1 sat 😐
63
42
268
60,773
Bitcoin Core is already laying the ground for dismantling the 21 million coin limit. This will be their "not so controversial" solution to the security budget issue.
It certainly could. Which is why people should run nodes to discourage a non-consensual hard fork. Conversely, I think in, say, 10-20 years the idea of a hard fork to add a small tail emission may not be so controversial any more, and the community as a whole might accept it.
74
67
249
193,786
Lightning is the biggest Bitcoin scam ever ongoing for 9 years. It's either fully custodial or it's actually more expensive to use than on-chain transactions: added costs of running and managing Lightning nodes, wATchToWeRs, rEBalAnCinG, spLiCiNG, sWeePiNg, sUBmaRiNe sWapS ⚡️
I just paid $16 fees for a lightning txn with Phoenix wallet. Plain old regular on-chain would’ve been cheaper at 72 sat/vB due to lower weight. Thank you sPLiCiNg. PS: there was no preview or warning about this. Are we surprised people think bitcoin UX sucks? Coz it does…
25
54
262
23,800
One more Lightning Network attack vector: medium.com/blockchains-huji/… “Our results show that the attacker can paralyze 830 BTC in the Lightning Network spending less than 0.25 BTC” 🤦‍♂️ Does anyone besides the corrupt Core devs still believe that Lightning will scale Bitcoin?
14
82
246
Existing L2s on both Bitcoin and Ethereum are money service businesses (MSBs) and are likely to fail under regulatory pressure right after privacy services! 🧐 1. All L2s (whether sidechains or rollups) are custodial. Customer funds are either locked in a multisig contract controlled by some federation (Liquid Network) or fully controlled by some emergency council (Arbitrum One, Optimism, etc.). Yes, they can steal all user funds if you didn't know. L2s enable transmitting funds from one person to another. 2. All L2s are a) centralized, b) for-profit businesses. a) While some might pretend to be "D"AOs, in fact, they're still fully controlled by their developers or initial investors due to how the tokens allowing to elect the said "security councils" are distributed. Technically speaking, they are all just ordinary companies. Lightning Network also consists of centralized authorities, which already go down one by one. These centralized parties transmit funds for their users. b) Their business goal is to earn on transaction fees. These fees are pocketed in and distributed amongst the token holders (i.e. shareholders). 3. None of these L2 companies have any banking licences. This makes them and the persons behind developing them a low-hanging fruit for virtually any three-letter agency. Hopefully, no sanctioned persons use Base? 🤔 4. Unlike L1 miners and validators, all those who run L2s are easily identifiable and targeted. It's known who's developing them, who's holding the admin keys to control the security councils, and so on. Many privacy services (Samourai, Wasabi, Tornado) and Lightning service providers (Phoenix, WoS, IBEX, Mash to name a few) are already down at least in some jurisdictions. L2s are a huge legal liability waiting to happen: blockchains need L1 scaling to win. Which L2 will go down first do you think? 🤨
45
66
225
30,856
The said L2 "revolution" is just a bunch of private companies trying to take over cryptos. Bitcoin is plagued with the Lightning scam created by banksters. Ethereum's scaling plan is now a pile of centralized rollups with admin keys. Scaling L1 yields the true decentralization.
The layer 2 revolution is already happening in crypto Not widely discussed, and just getting started Scalability will be a big deal, unlocking utility, payments, next wave of growth
38
33
237
26,665
The laser eyes: Lightning Network is the best scaling solution, it is growing tremendously fast! ⚡️ The reality: Lightning's capacity has dropped by 15% over the last 3 months to under a mere 5k BTC 📉
54
34
229
36,995
Ethereum is now captured by the very same custodial L2 plague as Bitcoin. And it literally repeats Bitcoin step by step. Let's dive in! ⬇️ Step 1. Ban L1 scaling. Bitcoin: Core developers refused to scale L1, dropped all proposals to increase the block size, censored all those who opposed Ethereum: Foundation refused to scale L1, dropped all proposals to increase the gas limit (remember EGL?), dropped sharding from the roadmap, invented the phoney "blockchain trilemma" Step 2. Introduce scaling "solutions". Bitcoin: introduced custodial centralized L2s financed by banksters (Lightning, Liquid, etc.) Ethereum: introduced custodial centralized L2s financed by banksters (all rollups have admin keys despite pretending to be DAOs) Step 3. Make L1 even more expensive. Bitcoin: introduced special fee discount for using L2s (SegWit discount, Tapscript) so it becomes even more expensive to use L1 compared to L2 Ethereum: introduced special fee discount for using L2s (the newest hard fork) Both call it "scaling". The truth is it's not scaling: it's just an attempt (a successful one so far) to lock people into custodial L2 products.
Replying to @ercwl
the hardfork - is called dencun - also known as eip-4844 - also known as proto-danksharding - turns ethereum into a blobchain - means that ethereum rollups are no longer rollups (the definition of a rollup is smth that uses *L1* for DA, not ephemeral data blobs) - actually does something about execution fees (the merge did not really, wasn’t designed to) - probably won’t solve L1 fees (L2 raw data having their own blobspace will offload L1 somewhat but not a gamechanger) - L2 fees should be dirt cheap though - ethereum will still be a hot mess until shared sequencing or something solves cross-rollup liquidity aggregation (hard, will prob take 3 years to perfect if it even gets ”perfected” at all) - this is still better than sharding - it’s still ”better” than solana in the same way that bitcoin with lightning is still better than bitcoin sv - but it’s not an either or and the world has room for both modular-like and monolithic approaches (even if single rollup with a proper DA-layer should be superior to any monolithic system but whatever no one cares)
21
56
228
51,899
How to drop the 21 million coin cap? 🪄 Easy-peasy! You just change this tiny function in Bitcoin's code and say (mysteriously and expertously) that there's a "coNsEnSUs" for that:
105
36
216
75,094
Ethereum is doomed. Every single L2 there is completely centralized and owned by some bankster corporation, and they're thinking about how to lock people in L3s now. Disgusting. Validators, um, hello? They're stealing your fees 💸
I'm still building my intuitions around how exactly the architecture of L1/L2/L3 will shape up, but I currently believe there are a few substantive benefits to L3s: 1. settlement costs for L3s will be 10-100x cheaper. these costs are small but for devs they are still meaningful. 2. just in time bridging from L2 to L3 will be fast, cheaper, and significantly more capital efficient than going from L1 to L2 or L2 to L2. 3. the pathway for onramps to L3s will be much more streamlined because you have L2 stakeholders who will work hard to make them seamless via routing through L2. I think that on a long time period some or all of these may be solved by proof aggregation but in the short to medium time horizon am still working through how exactly that will shape up. I also think that my thinking here is also influenced by a belief that we will see much more homogeneity at L2, with the ultimate end game being that many L2s either become tightly coupled to each other (eg the superchain) and/or to L1 (via based sequencing and native zk prover support in the L1). in parallel, I expect we will see much more experimentation at L3 with different VMs (eg orbit, MoveVM, svm, parallel EVM), data availability decisions (eg Celestia, eigenDA, S3), and centralization characteristics. my best mental model for L3 right now is onchain connected servers - and I think there will be millions or billions of them. would love to hear other folks thoughts on all this - I'm still very much in the learning phase! and if you want to build an L3 on @base, lmk and I'll do everything I can do help!
31
46
216
24,185
This is a typical Bitcoin block since the halving: Runes are orange, ordinary transfers are the rest 😳 Bitcoin has completely ceased to be an "Electronic Cash System": it barely processes 0.5 monetary transactions per second, and people pay $100+ for that 💸
27
44
209
30,157
Bitcoin now has 2 modes: 1. Low fees: 1 sat per byte can't sustain security considering halvings 2. High fees: unusable, people switch to other chains, which leads back to mode 1, i.e. no security The solution? A block size increase to fit more transactions paying low fees.
150
26
197
34,730
Average transaction fees for today! UTXO Liquid (L2): $0.061 ⛔️ Litecoin (L1): $0.0064 ✅ EVM Base (L2): $0.12 ⛔️ Fantom (L1): $0.013 ✅ 🕵️ Polygon zkEVM (L2): $0.43 ⛔️ Monero (L1): $0.046 ✅ Why use expensive custodial L2s when there are much cheaper decentralized L1s? 🤔
20
45
201
31,209
(2/2)… got stuck on a minority chain (~30 blocks in 2 hours) 3. Technically, that was an unannounced hard fork. Something similar happened to #Bitcoin 7 years ago when there was a database upgrade: github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob… 4. Fix: upgrade geth and run debug.setHead(11234872)
16
28
196
Spoiler: they won't figure this out. Scaling Bitcoin with Lightning is a fundamentally broken approach. No scaling at all as we can see: once blocks are full, Lightning stops working too.
That hurts: Sorry guys, we had to take Boltz offline for the time being⚠️ Our on-chain working capital is all locked up in the mempool and swaps started failing. A disabled swap service is better than a failing swap service. Bear with us, we'll be back when we figured this out.
30
37
190
36,997
Bitcoin's recommended fee is just 12 satoshi per byte now. Considering the upcoming halvings, Bitcoin becomes insecure as it's not able to collect enough in fees despite the ATH buzz and Ordinals. The security budget for the last 24 hours was + $68.5M as subsidy (would've been $34M in a month after the next halving) + $2.5M as fees (just 3.5%!) = $71M in total to secure a $1.4T network! Now imagine what happens when the subsidy dries out completely. That's called the security budget issue. And it is happening because Bitcoin is not scaling its L1 to have more transactions paying fees.
55
40
199
35,877
My data shows that Monero has experienced deep reorgs (up to 6 blocks) over the last 24 hours. I'd define this as a successful 51% attack (low-impact and not long-lasting though). I've warned the Monero community several times about the low security budget. Bitcoin is next! 🚨
Looks like #Qubic has achieved 51% over #Monero, we are waiting for independent confirmations. In the meanwhile #Monero team is polishing details of their 51% attack protection. Many accused us of being sponsored by 3-letter agencies to attack this anon coin. What do you think now, after we has helped Monero to prepare for its future fights against those agencies?..
26
24
201
24,017
It seems like the #DogeCoin network is under a massive DoS attack amidst the 500% $DOGE pump. Sporadic block times, nodes can’t connect to each other.
21
48
182
My predictions age like fine wine 🍷 As Lightning has already fallen under regulatory pressure, here's a prediction on what happens next. All custodial L2s such as Liquid will fall too unless they impose KYC. Mark this post. Bitcoin needs to scale on-chain.
26
39
195
12,131
This is one of the biggest scams in cryptocurrency history. There are 7 million citizens, but Bitcoin is limited to 250k transactions per day, and the average transaction fee was more than $30 just recently. Bitcoin is not technically capable of handling this. A thread (1/3)
Every El Salvador 🇸🇻 citizen to receive $30 in free #Bitcoin from their government, when registered on their wallet app.
21
44
186
Correction: the reorg was 100 (!) blocks deep wiping out 570k transactions. It was just our alert system that didn’t expect someone trying to revert the whole blockchain and stopped at 18. Oh well, there are some risks associated with transacting on low-hashrate blockchains.
19
24
187
May I present to you the future of Bitcoin payments: the failure rate for your $50 transaction is an amazingly low 40%. If the Bitcoin price drops a bit, your success rate will be a gorgeous 50%. And don’t worry about zero privacy, high fees, and multiple vulnerabilities ⚡️
Lightning payment reliability for $100 payments has been launched higher by Bitcoin's price increase. $100 of BTC can now be sent anywhere in the lightning network with a 77% chance of success, up 20% from last year. To improve further, lightning network topology must shift.
34
35
191
16,394
So when do Bitcoin maxis start promoting fractional Bitcoin banking? I can't wait! 🤪 Bitcoin: A Peer-to-BlackRock-to-JPMorgan-to-Peer Electronic Fractional Reserve System 📜 Not scaling the actual Bitcoin is the biggest fraud in history.
In the future, Banks like JP Morgan will issue wrapped Bitcoin coins. These will trade on multiple fast blockchains, and will be redeemable on demand for actual Bitcoin. It will be the new version of the "Traveller's Check". This is how we solve the "scaling problem" on Bitcoin. Not with larger blocks.
31
25
182
21,819
Monero seems to be slightly stress-tested. So far the results are good: the dynamic block size algo works as expected, the average fee is $0.012. The "attacker" pays just $1,000 a day to run this experiment. The only thing I'd be concerned about is "we need an L2" fearmongers. As Monero is one of the very few cryptos left which is still non-compliant and cares about user privacy (thus delistings), it will be attacked. One of the obvious attack vectors is "see, we need this shiny anti-privacy custodial L2 to scale". This worked with Bitcoin. And Ethereum. Beware!
24
16
181
13,178
So why can't Luke be expelled from Bitcoin Core? Gavin Andresen (a lead developer!) was expelled for trying to raise the block size. Why doesn't the same apply to Luke? It can't be that it's because he co-founded Blockstream and their goal has always been to abuse and stall 🤔
I disagree. @LukeDashjr has cost valuable Bitcoin contributors more than than most people can imagine. He manufactures controversies over inanities, abuses his authority, and tells half truths that take time and expertise to refute. I think he's been a net negative for Bitcoin
24
31
179
27,614
The funniest part about ⚡️ laser ⚡️ eyes ⚡️ who constantly promote Lightning is when they actually try using it. Wait until he finds out what a force close is 😅 Spoiler: there is none. Lightning can't work reliably, can't be fully non-custodial, and the UX is garbage 👇
I need a lightning wallet that works reliably, is non-custodial, and is simple to use. Our local rancher wants to receive Bitcoin payments, but he's running out of steam trying all of our best options. The payment system has to WORK. Why do I even have to say this??
28
25
172
18,243
The average #Bitcoin transaction fee is now over $3.
13
101
173
A Lightning dev (@renepickhardt) responding to a "My payments don't go through" question: "This is the way how Lightning is designed: payment failures are built-in into the protocol. What you could do is to send 5 payments concurrently and hope that at least one will arrive" 🤡⚡️
29
28
168
26,839
This company has never had a single meaningful product. It's just $210 million more towards crippling Bitcoin.
Blockstream secures $210 million to drive Layer 2 growth and expand its bitcoin treasury theblock.co/post/321074/bloc…
14
31
170
10,113
Unfortunately, it seems like #Ethereum🦄 is going down #Bitcoin’s path. The average transaction fee is almost $25, users are complaining, there’s an easy instant fix (increase the gas limit), it’s safe (the uncle rate is low), but smart devs say NO just because. Bearish for $ETH.
47
33
169
Maxis before reading Satoshi emails: 💆💆‍♀️💆‍♂️ Maxis after reading Satoshi emails: Satoshi is an attack on Bitcoin 😡😠🤬
20
23
168
14,113
Blockstream and Core “developers” are the worst obstacle Bitcoin has ever faced and has yet to overcome. They’ve created a problem and now selling a solution — a centralized and anti-privacy one.
if you are actively trading and don't like high fees, use exchanges with 🌊 @liquid_btc integration, or complain to an exchange that doesn't. pay 1-2c to clear in 2mins final, while others are paying 50c-$2.50 for 1hr+ transfer. nitter.app/adam3us/status/1264279… be part of the solution
11
37
165
Bitcoin: BlackRock, pls buy 🤡 Ethereum: Uncle Gary, pls when ETF 🤡 Monero: More delistings please! 😎 Now that's what I call a real flex worthy of the term "cryptocurrency".
17
27
159
7,604
$16 billion is locked in Arbitrum One... And this entire amount could be instantly rug-pulled by the "security council" via an "emergency action" at any moment! The "council" is just 9 persons holding admin keys who can change the protocol however they want. Welcome to L2s! 🌅
13
25
163
11,787
I can’t wait for the moment Lightning fans realize that in order to recover anything via Lightning they’d have to spend the very same $50 in fees because they first need to send the dust to a channel using an on-chain (!) transaction. Unbelievably lame. Lightning is a scam.
11
15
163
Monero is not pumping because it's not an ordinary crypto. Unlike transparent cryptos, it offers true financial sovereignty. Delisted from everywhere, it belongs to a different asset class now. An asset class not reacting to some politicians winning or losing an election.
When I see such a broad crypto pump and XMR is not pumping along, it tells you 2 direct things: 1. There is a large non organic fraud component of what's happening. 2. The people conducting that fraud dont like Monero. Im not complaining, but it is worth noting.
15
19
157
8,728
Satoshi was obviously a "big blocker". His invention was all about pure P2P payments. Those people who say that Satoshi doesn't matter want Bitcoin users to use their "better inventions" a.k.a. custodial banking solutions such as Lightning instead of decentralized P2P payments.
The new bitcoin script just dropped. Satoshi doesn't matter?
18
33
156
10,769
Days without finding a new critical Lightning Network vulnerability: 0 • github.com/ariard/mempool-re…github.com/ariard/bitcoin/co…lists.linuxfoundation.org/pi… "We argue this replacement cycling is one of the most practical way to steal Lightning funds" 🤔
7
41
156
50,626
Lightning is a total vapourware coupled with “we need Watchtowers”-like technobabble. Lots of fundamental flaws, no actual real-world usage. Liquid is a KYC’ed swamp not even worth discussing. That’s it. No other scaling solutions have been presented by Core developers. (8/20)
11
12
153
In other words, Bitcoin is down for almost 24 hours for most of its users ⛔️
82% of wallets that hold bitcoin cannot move right now due to high fees.
21
20
153
10,898
My report on the negative impact of Taproot on Bitcoin’s privacy. PDF: github.com/Har01d/talks/raw/… tl;dr: Introducing one more common address format (P2TR) will lead to disastrous privacy leaks. Please help to spread the message to miners. My DM’s are open for questions. (1/35)
53
41
143
I've been predicting this for a long time. All these "D"EXs, "decentralized" L2s, and other "D"AOs are not decentralized at all. When you issue a governance token and leave 50%+ of it to yourself, it's not "decentralized", it's a scam. A real DEX doesn't need to have a token.
Today @Uniswap Labs received a Wells notice from the SEC. I’m not surprised. Just annoyed, disappointed, and ready to fight. I am confident that the products we offer are legal and that our work is on the right side of history. But it’s been clear for a while that rather than working to create clear, informed rules, the SEC has decided to focus on attacking long-time good actors like Uniswap and Coinbase. All while letting bad actors like FTX slip by. When I first set out to build Uniswap, the goal wasn’t to reimagine finance. It was an experiment in radically decentralized, fully automated onchain markets. I didn’t know if it would work or if anyone would use it. Fast forward to today, the Uniswap Protocol has processed over $2 trillion in volume. Many thousands of teams and developers have forked our code or built on top of it. We built entirely new financial infrastructure that is transparent, fair, secure, and accessible powering an entire industry. The team at @Uniswap did all of this in the US from our office in New York City. People often ask me why we stay in the US and my answer is simple: I believe that blockchain is incredibly powerful technology. Like the Internet, it’s here to stay. So someone needs to figure it out, and it might as well be us. And that when you build technology that improves people’s lives – you don’t need to hide. The @SEC’s mission is “protecting investors, maintaining fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitating capital formation.” This is a noble mission. I would argue @Uniswap does a far better job of this today than the SEC. Yes, I'm frustrated that the SEC seems to be more concerned with protecting opaque systems than protecting consumers. And that we'll have to fight a US government agency to protect our company and our industry. This fight will take years, may go all the way to the Supreme Court, and the future of financial technology and our industry hangs in the balance. If we stand together we can win. I think freedom is worth fighting for. I think DeFi is worth fighting for. And of course, we won’t stop shipping. Stay tuned 🦄💜
31
30
145
31,721
What Luke fails to mention is that it was the infallible Bitcoin Core developers (i.e. himself included) who introduced this "bug" with Taproot. Since 2015, the Core developers have only been damaging Bitcoin in all possible ways: bugs, censorship, anti-privacy features. 🧵
7
28
145
14,697
"Dear Bitcoin community, there is something very fishy happening in the Bitcoin Core development process right now" — as if it hasn't been happening for 9 years now 😅 Bitcoin Core devs don't serve Bitcoin users, they serve their corporate investors 🤷‍♂️ stacker.news/items/440692
4
31
147
10,082
The defence against this attack (or Ordinals if one considers them a bug) is a block size increase. Increase the block size to 10 MB and this attack now costs $45 billion. 200 MB? A trillion! The only real attack on Bitcoin, which is happening, is not increasing the block size.
If the US government wanted to, they could spam the chain and set a permanent floor at 200 sat/vByte for only $4.5 billion per year at current #Bitcoin  prices. No ordinal nonsense needed.
40
25
148
18,606
I've been playing with CashTokens for the last day 🤪 It's fun! Blockchain-native tokens are much more efficient than contracts on top of blockchains. And more efficient also means lower fees. But if you're building on top of CashTokens, forget everything you know about ERCs 🧵
CashTokens are now live on 3xpl.com/bitcoin-cash! Both FT and NFT transfers are supported 🚀
5
44
125
13,491
Bitcoin Core and Blockstream have been damaging BItcoin for 8 years straight. Their commercial L2 products are a failure. Miners and businesses should wake up. So far the result is Bitcoin losing its dominance (-50% already). Later it will be losing its 21M limit as well.
11
18
132
9,084
Well ok, wow indeed. I guess the “#HashWar” is over. $BCHSV now has — less hashpower — lower price — no ecosystem support (e.g. no single block explorer) We can conclude that the first 51% attack on $BCH has failed. Thanks for an exciting day!
The Bitcoin.com pool now has more hash rate on it than the entire BCH network had earlier today. Bitcoin is cash for the world! #BitcoinCash #bitcoincashfork
22
30
128
So much for a dEceNTrAliZeD aUtONomoUs OrGanIzaTiOn 🤡 tl;dr: the Arbitrum community voted to fund legal defence for Tornado Cash devs (98.5% or $8M in stake voted "for") and then the vote disappeared. Who could've thought it wasn't a DAO, but a classic bankster corporation 🤪
I wish I had taken screenshots but it all happened way too suddenly Yesterday we had a forum post & snapshot up on @arbitrum to support the @juiceboxETH campaign for funding the legal defense of the tornado cash devs All of a sudden the entire forum thread was deleted along with the snapshot without any discussion or record of it , supposedly on overblown fears of legal risk There is absolutely nothing wrong with paying for the legal defense of someone accused, it's a US right that everyone deserves a lawyer I thought arbitrum was about freedom, when we begin self censoring ourselves it doesn't put us in a good light
14
44
136
13,410
Bitcoiners underestimate the risk of the 21M cap being removed 🫤 1. The security budget issue is here: the fee rate is 2 sat/byte; the idea that L2s would pay a lot to L1 has failed; L1 scaling isn’t happening (well done, Core). 2. It can be done deceptively as a soft fork!
Replying to @solari_the
They are already priming the public to increase the 21 million supply cap. HBO had a documentary making the assertion that Peter Todd is Satoshi. Todd has been a public advocate for increasing the 21 million supply. The Blackrock and other ETFs have increasing the supply as a risk factor. What an epic scam.
27
17
132
15,298
Lightning Network is dead. Can we scale Bitcoin now please?
Recent announcements from US authorities cast a doubt on whether self-custodial wallet providers, Lightning service providers, or even Lightning nodes could be considered Money Services Businesses and be regulated as such.
29
22
128
11,232
Three wild crypto predictions for 2021: 1) $USDT will collapse 2) $ETH will overthrow $BTC by market capitalization 3) Privacy-oriented coins like $ZEC and $XMR will get more traction due to new KYC regulations and the Darknet realizing that $BTC is too transparent
23
10
123
Lightning developers are leaving the sinking ship ⚡️ 1⃣ "I consider LN a done deal ... LN is not what market wants ... LN demand has been absorbed by custodial solutions": njump.me/nevent1qqsv5jyfh9gp… 2⃣ "Corporate capture underway of the Lightning Dev Kit": stacker.news/items/298135
17
28
129
12,875
Uhmmm, I was away from Twitter for a month, and Zcash did like 8x in price in the meantime? What happened? 🤯
22
5
138
18,381
Cool, but overhyped. If anything, it's like trying to run chess in Minecraft — possible in theory, but not in practice for Elo over 100. There's no global state (so no ERC-20s, swaps, etc.), still can't even multiply numbers efficiently, etc. Definitely not an "EVM on Bitcoin".
"Any computable function can be verified on Bitcoin" bitvm.org/bitvm.pdf
12
8
128
39,283
Well, of course, Satoshi understood nothing about Bitcoin! Not unlike the know-it-all laser-eyed "cypherpunks" who understand that Bitcoin is not a "peer-to-peer electronic cash system", but simply a layer for their corporate custodial networks such as Liquid and Lightning! 🤦‍♂️
Many are excited about the new Satoshi emails just released. It's great to have more of this history archived. But I caution folks from putting too much effort into interpreting Satoshi's words. Even Satoshi didn't fully understand Bitcoin, nor had the hindsight we have today.
10
24
122
6,431
General media will start talking about Ethereum, they will report Ethereum price instead of Bitcoin. Bitcoin will instantly become fool’s gold taking its place near Litecoin and Dogecoin. A historical relic like ARPANET, Myspace, or AltaVista. (18/20)
3
12
129
Sometimes I still wonder how much more time is required to comprehend that Lightning is a complete failure? Over the last 5 years nothing has been produced except for bugs and papers on fundamental flaws 🤦‍♂️
NEW: A vulnerability in @lightning LND versions 0.10.x and below was revealed Thursday in the Lighting developer mailing list. Node operators are urged to update to the newest version ASAP. Reported by @wsfoxley trib.al/dZNFHXA
14
35
130
Considering how many Blockstream faces are in this short trailer, I bet it's just a propaganda film that would end in something like "Bitcoin Core is Satoshi" 🥱
JUST IN: New HBO documentary claims to have uncovered the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of #Bitcoin.
16
17
123
7,183
The best of crypto Twitter for today lmao 🤣
7
12
125
16,352
I don't mean to gloat, but this was predicted years ago. #bcasherswereright Lightning hubs, even if they say they're not custodial, still relay payments. They're identifiable and trackable. Lightning Network is the first thing to collapse under regulatory government pressure.
On May 3rd, 2024, @PhoenixWallet will be removed from US app stores. Users from the US should empty their wallet: - Settings > Close channels (Android) - Settings > Drain wallet (iOS) We highly recommend *not force-closing* channels, as on-chain fees could be significant.
18
25
126
5,142
I think the year 2020 gives the last chance for Bitcoin to properly scale on-chain to be able to adopt new users. Otherwise it will get eaten by competitors. (20/20)
19
6
121
What are the top cryptos which are fully private or have a protocol level shielded pool? Litecoin (#20): MimbleWimble ($2.5M locked) Monero (#48): private by default ($2.3B) Zcash (#170): three shielded pools ($30M) What else? CoinJoin and its variants are not accepted 🤓
60
20
120
11,129
Really? Retweeting a Blockstream troll on the payroll who is saying that Ethereum is a scam? Some people still don’t get it who are the real scammers here… Hint: it’s not the Ethereum Foundation which has been blocking Bitcoin from any real progress for more than 6 years.
I used @getvicarious to create and sync a list of all accounts I’m following, set that list to be reverse chron, named it “Latest” and pinned it, and now I can quickly swipe between ranked (algorithm) and all tweets as they happen (inspired by an idea from team)
5
17
116
Just as Bitcoin switched from being "a P2P electronic cash system" to "a settlement layer", Ethereum went from "the world computer" to "a blob storage" 🤦‍♂️ Now both have security budget problems, and developers innovate somewhere else. I'd expect Ethereum's dominance to plummet.
Ethereum is in deep trouble UNI moving off-chain is only the final nail in the coffin, all apps are moving to competing L1s & L2s instead Collapsing ETH revenue, UNI was ETH's biggest fee-paying customer! Now ETH is being left behind, irrelevant & broken; Ethereum is cooked 🧵 What did we expect would happen after pushing all usage to competing chains ("L2 scaling") A cucked course of action from the perspective of ETH Betraying ETH's cypherpunk dream for the sake of L2 VC funding, as the ultrasound money meme has now been thoroughly defeated by "L2 scaling" It is as clear as day from the moment Dank Sharding was implemented, as you can see in the chart below: It shows that when users move off the L1 significantly fewer fees end up on the L1, decreasing the burn rate. This should have been obvious from the start. This usage & resulting revenue is now getting captured by rent-seeking L2s instead! That is what makes it parasitic, as only a fraction of the fees ends up back in the L1, while for-profit companies get to keep the rest. All while these same parties lobby to keep ETH's L1 block space constrained This chart released by @Unchained_pod even shows how for every dollar paid to the L1 OP gets to keep 300 dollars! If that is not extractive, I do not know what is: EIP-4844 only accelerated that process, by giving L2s a cheap place to put their data while entirely ignoring L1 users, that is why UNI is forced to move elsewhere: The fact that a swap cost over $30 on ETH now is completely unacceptable, as well as a $60 NFTs sale fee, what is this clown world? 🤡 It is all effectively a giant middle finger to the incredible achievements of ETH DeFi, as they break up the kingdom into smaller parts for the sake of selfish profit. High fees kill utility & innovation every single time: UNI should move as far as possible away from ETH as possible as far as I am concerned The UNI L2 will have its own validator set anyway, so it will be entirely possible for them to pivot to becoming an L1 in their own right in the future, or they will deploy the uni app natively on an alternative chain eventually The only reason left to deploy on ETH is the security, however, security is based on revenue in the long run. This is why ETH is on a steady path to nowhere with its current roadmap, as L2s are sucking all of the life out of it Bait & Switch: We all noticed it, we are not stupid, just like we also noticed it for BTC, as the light of truth exposes all of the corruption As instead of a "global computer"; a single composable state where all DeFi could interoperate; ETH is now a fragmented ecosystem of centralized service providers... The complete opposite of what ETH was supposed to become, to make it even worse: Remember ETH 2.0? Scaling the L1 through execution sharding; That has now been successfully implemented on NEAR & EGLD with more soon to come. All while purely parallelized chains make a decent case for not even needing to implement sharding & still keeping up with massive demand! As the technology has advanced so far we can even say that we have solved the classical blockchain trilemma in practice, making all of the compromises inherent in ETH's "L2 scaling" entirely unnecessary All while the ETH core developers claim that scaling the L1 while preserving decentralization is "impossible", an unbearable state of affairs Conclusion: Ethereum is effectively bankrupt, not just intellectually & ethically but also economically Still riding on the laurels of its past success, most cannot see the writing on the wall At this point, Ethereum deserves to lose, as it has been doing over the last year, losing ground to its technologically far superior competitors. The success of UNI is no longer correlated with the success of ETH The numbers do not lie, ETH has made itself irrelevant & it will continue to decline as it continues down this self-destructive path. The future now belongs to the countless alternatives that are open for business now!
15
24
118
18,106
Samourai Wallet is down because they a) were not anonymous (most important!) b) collected fees / operated a business c) lived in certain "first-world countries" Not a good mix 🤔
Founders and CEO of cryptocurrency mixing service arrested and charged with money laundering and unlicensed money transmitting offenses @IRSCI_NY @NewYorkFBI 🔗: justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/fou…
8
13
116
8,035
Sorry Bitcoin maxis, but the flippening is in full force now. $ETH / $BTC:
12
13
119
The clouds are gathering ☁️ 👉 DoJ gets Samourai devs arrested 👉 FBI issues a PSA on non-KYC crypto transmitters 👉 SEC says MetaMask is an unlicensed broker-dealer All in one day! Has the battle started? Some questions to think about 👇 1. Is Bitcoin ready? Will it have any chance to bring privacy to the protocol level? Taproot and Lightning were just decoys from the corrupted Core developers that weakened privacy, not improved it. 2. Will assets such as Monero become a separate asset class from Bitcoin and other "not private by default" cryptos? 3. On the same day, Strike, one of the most popular custodial Lightning wallets, announced it expanded to Europe. Considering that it's a money transmitting service, like all other Lightning hubs and Lightning service providers, does it mean that the future of Lightning is KYC or bust? 4. Were they afraid of the "SoV" side at all? If it's traded on regulated exchanges only, fully KYCed, and mostly controlled by Wall Street, then it's easily manipulable. Was the "free MoE" more dangerous? They're fine with ETFs for the elites, but not fine with ordinary people trying to stay private. Don't forget to bring the umbrella! ☔️
15
16
114
10,377
LMAO! @rogerkver is sending $BCH to some people so they could try out the real P2P electronic cash experience… Salty maxis suggest dumping $BCH for $BTC, but they fail at doing this because of… Bitcoin’s on-chain fees 🤣
13
15
117
As I predicted, Base is now openly transitioning from being an Ethereum L2 into a stand-alone USDC L1. It doesn't need Ethers to operate anymore. They print USDC and now allow users to pay fees in USDC. "L2" is just a smokescreen for locking your Ethers in a multisig contract.
Paymaster now allows users to pay for gas with custom ERC-20 tokens on @Base! This feature enables increased token utility, easier app engagement, and the ability for users to pay gas with USDC or custom tokens instead of ETH.
40
11
118
58,587
Despite the clogged mempool and enormous transaction fees, Lightning Network is still not being used by anyone. 9 years of development and waiting have gone down the drain. It's time to scale Bitcoin on-chain!
36
22
109
9,368