See larrysanger.org. Purveyor of obvious truths, ex-founder of Wikipedia. Now president, @ks_found. Buy 69,020 books on a thumb drive! đşđ¸â ACNA
LarrySanger.org
- Tweets 85,833
- Following 1,256
- Followers 93,637
- Likes 43,457
Pinned Tweet
Well, now itâs really official. After being blocked this morning, then unblocked (after being defended by Jimmy Wales), I have now, as of this evening, been âblocked indefinitelyâ from editing Wikipedia.
The charges are lies and misrepresentations.
More soon.
Well, thatâs thatâIâve been blocked by Wikipedia âindefinitelyâ for unstated reasons, by the âconsensusâ of a mob. There was no due process, no prosecutor, no dispassionate judge, no jury, no interpretation of law. All my judges were self-selected and hated me. đ¤Ł
213
477
3,303
476,688
Hi @ElonMusk. Wikipedia co-founder here. May I ask you to determine what branches of the U.S. governmentâif any!âhave employees paid to edit, monitor, update, lobby, etc., WIkipedia?
Such operations should be defunded, if any. If there are *none*, weâd like to know. Agree?
1,729
10,649
126,570
8,110,845
Hi, @realDonaldTrumpâco-founder of Wikipedia hereâcould I persuade you to use an executive order to make it a policy that neither federal worker hours nor federal moneys may be used to edit Wikipedia or pay for Wikipedia editing?
Thanks in advance. (I voted for you.)
668
3,999
33,739
35,257,047
Wikipedia is so ironic. We wanted to give a voice to the voiceless, but what emerged was one of the most effective organs of Establishment propaganda in history.
397
3,201
31,325
1,710,336
Did you know that 85% of the most influential accounts on Wikipediaâthe âPower 62ââare anonymous? We simply donât know who they are. Itâs a fact.
đ¨ Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger Reveals How Anonymous For-Hire Editors Shape the Narrative on the Platform
âThey can libel people with impunity ⌠and there is no legal recourseâ
515
3,550
18,591
14,357,284
Hey @elonmusk, as a critical co-founder of Wikipedia, I find disturbing the influence that Wikipedia has over the Community Notes on X. Why not ask the people, âShould Wikipedia be banned as a usable source for Community Notes purposes on X? Vox populi, vox Dei.â
1,135
2,226
18,294
19,374,972
I am nailing Nine Theses to the door of @Wikipedia. This has been my project for the last nine months. There has never been a thoroughgoing Wikipedia reform proposalâthis is the first. If it doesn't work, we need to organize an alternative. đ§ľ
831
3,366
17,646
7,351,779
For people who donât know me:
- I left WIkipedia in 2002.
- I have been a critic since 2004.
- The Wikipedia process is almost as opaque to me as it is to you.
- Yes itâs biased, Iâve said so for a long time. See my blog (LarrySanger.org).
- I do Encyclosphere.org.
90
568
13,459
624,312
A new Harvard/Johnâs Hopkins study found that for every one COVID hospitalization prevented, â18 to 98 actual serious adverse eventsâ have have been caused.
The vaccine and vaccine mandates have been an enormous mistake, and studies are proving it.
theepochtimes.com/unethical-âŚ
282
6,916
12,347
A big Indian website now, OpIndia.
âNobody should trust Wikipediaâ, warns its co-founder Larry Sanger, says the site is taken over by leftists who reject content that doesnât fit their agenda
opindia.com/2021/07/nobody-sâŚ
97
2,589
10,516
1/ Thread:
Child sex traffickingâby elitesâis a horrible reality.
Below, I outline the case for this claim. Please share with friends so they can wake up.
Favor? After each tweet, please post the most persuasive online evidence you know of.
> There is proof of all this. <
đ
429
4,216
6,259
There has been a lot of (as far as I can tell, well-justified) criticism about Wikipedia's bias against Israel. There is less talk about Wikipedia's bias against Hindus. But the evidence is there, too.
opindia.com/2024/09/opindia-âŚ
117
2,197
6,839
339,969
Hey @elonmusk does this mean that my X account is now officially unthrottled? This is my first viral post in a few years. Or is the tweet just so awesome that it overcame the throttling? đ¤đ¤đ¤
59
102
6,708
497,488
I'll decide for myself whether there will be Great Reset in my life, thanks very much. And I will insist, as a citizen of a great and free democratic republic, on being free to voice my concerns about draconian new government controls and loss of national sovereignty.
78
747
4,760
And since everybody is congregating here, Iâll just use this opportunity to advance the Kingdom of God:
larrysanger.org/2025/02/how-âŚ
185
209
5,583
512,213
I wasnât very nice to Wikipedia in this interview.
Watch this exclusive interview of @lsanger, founder of Wikipedia. He talks about how Wikipedia started, its Left bias, Jimmy Wales, his unwillingness to fix things and what we can do about it.
This was the most eye opening interview I have ever conducted
piped.video/bwcPEACzUfQ
55
1,200
5,150
You have got to be kidding me. "Car crash."
Wikipedia has become a ridiculous self-parody.
179
909
4,943
Today I learned that some of the most popular books on Amazon are porn novels for women in which the love interest is a monster, demon, or other supernatural creature. Iâm afraid Iâm not kidding.
248
304
4,842
214,147
Um..."if consumers don't like what [Twitter does], they can go elsewhere" is exactly what the left was saying two weeks ago.
Suddenly, your tune changes!
Amazing! LOL!
49
230
4,478
One thing that many people donât realize is that Christianity has stuck around for 2,000 years in large part because it is a remarkably coherent system of belief. This is why generations upon generations of the most brilliant Western minds could be quite sincere Christians.
The Bible not only withstands probing questioning, it invites it: you cannot understand it in the manner its authors evidently intended it to be understood *unless* you deeply probe the text. The same is true of theology. While Christian theologians have not all agreed on questions of detail, they have agreed on many broad and important doctrines, which together render the biblical narrative clear, rational, and beautiful.
These are things that are poorly understood by non-Christians. I certainly did not understand them until I read the Bible all the way through, getting my questions answered reasonably well. I was shocked at how coherent and compelling the system was that emerged from this processâwhen it was merely the Bible properly understood according to orthodox Christian doctrine.
169
525
4,531
128,077
Hi @ElonMusk. Wikipedia co-founder here. May I ask you to determine what branches of the U.S. governmentâif any!âhave employees paid to edit, monitor, update, lobby, etc., WIkipedia?
Such operations should be defunded, if any. If there are *none*, weâd like to know. Agree?
34
407
4,355
732,465
1/ I have learned that the people probably angriest at Wikipedia are Hindus. They are seriously upset that Wikipedia has, at least in their opinion, a thoroughly one-sided view of the Delhi Riots from last February, favoring the Muslims and blaming Hindus as instigators.
123
1,238
4,062
Big Tech should be afraid. Recents events have seriously pissed off a lot of smart developers who are now working furiously to decentralize everything.
Your centralized, controlling platforms are going to be bad memories soon.
76
965
3,953
I see lots of tweets saying, "I'm going to church for the first time on Sunday" and "I'm starting to read the Bible."
Excellent. I'm with you. I became Christian after 35 years of unbelief. Here are some things I've written that might help:
- How to Read the Bible All the Way Through for the First Time
larrysanger.org/2023/09/how-âŚ
- How a Skeptical Philosopher Becomes a Christian
larrysanger.org/2025/02/how-âŚ
104
572
4,052
317,053
Grokipedia v0.1 launched 24 hours ago with nearly 900,000 articles. I ran a test comparing it to Wikipedia on ten controversial topics. The results were striking, and suggest Grokipedia might actually have a shot. đ
62
391
4,031
192,601
Wikipedia, in light of a strong launch from Grokipedia, youâd better get your house in orderâor youâll go the way of the Sears catalog.
Are you listening yet?
LarrySanger.org/nine-theses
217
428
3,728
615,975
1/ Must read. Let's demand an explanation for this from police/reporters:
*Why* was it that George Floyd worked with his killer, Derek Chauvin, on the security team for the El Nuevo Rodeo club on Tuesday nights "for much of the year before" the killing?
cbsnews.com/news/derek-chauvâŚ
302
1,439
2,478
So we need to learn the real news: Elite pedophilia exists. And elite pedophilia rings exist.
I rarely use all caps, but I'm going to this time, because I feel like screaming:
WE NEED TO START CARING ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF ELITE PEDOPHILIA AND ELITE PEDOPHILIA RINGS!
89
776
1,882
Is it really such a sore point still?
Iâm ready to bury the hatchet, @Jimmy_Wales.
Sehr lustig. (Hintergrund ist die von den Beteiligten unterschiedlich bewertete Rolle von @lsanger).
90
81
3,653
385,063
To #Ohio Gov. @MikeDeWine: I'm Dr. Larry Sanger, Wikipedia co-founder. I'm an Ohioan.
1/ I'm beyond being polite. I demand that you clarify the precise conditions under which all our freedoms will be restored. It's sickening I must ask this.
When will we be free again?
Answer!
155
786
2,879
I'm not suggesting that #Qanon or #Pizzagate are correct. Don't go beyond the evidence. But if you take your head out of the sand and actually *look at* and *think soberly about* that evidence, you'll find that elements of the world of the elites is much darker than we knew.
233
571
1,677
Very interesting study of Wikipedia India. Confirms oft-heard suspicions.
Years ago, my friend and I collaborated to write an investigative article on Wikipedia.
The plan was to expose the entrenched gang of Wikipedia editors who earn money by creating and editing Wikipedia pages.
A Bollywood producer helped me with the contact of an agency.
(Thread)
31
1,404
2,979
Please help me collect names of living people (or enterprises) who have been defamed or outrageously treated by Wikipedia. Add names below. This is important, trust me, so if you want to help, this is the time.
498
942
3,306
152,298
Elon Musk endorsed the âNine Theses.â Thanks, Elon!
Everyone, please read the documentâthe summary if not all the essaysâand help by engaging in the dialogue about them and getting on Wikipedia to add your voice.
The world would be better with a sounder Wikipedia.
52
255
3,211
187,949
In case you missed it: âNancy Antoinette.â Masks and salon (etc.) shutdowns for thee, not for me.
84
783
2,639
Should X disallow Wikipedia as a source for Community Notes?
67%
Yes
33%
No
38,665 votes ⢠Final results
244
454
3,061
297,019
And I also want to know this: What are we going to do about this problem?
One thing I urge you not to do, and that is to go back to sleep and pretend it doesn't exist and you haven't learned anything.
202
391
1,453
Why doesn't Wikipedia have more information about the Soros Foundation?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_SâŚ
This is straight off the Federal Register. Now ask yourself why Wikipedia doesn't mention the Soros Foundation. @lsanger
58
443
2,821
107,288
Wikipedia's current framework is "GASP": globalist, academic, secular, and progressive. Four of the theses are aimed at correcting, or reforming, this framework. But there are other ways in which Wikipedia needs to be reformed.
377
298
2,635
2,277,206
Somebody needs to make a website where people can report inaccuracies and problems with Wikipedia articles.
That and only that. Nothing else. A database of Wikipedia errors and misinformation.
If you make it, I promise to send it plenty of traffic. (I'm a Wikipedia co-founder.)
115
587
2,362
My initial impression, looking at my own article and poking around here and there, is that Grokipedia is very OK. The jury's still out as to whether it's actually better than Wikipedia. But at this point I would have to say "maybe"!
Grokipedia.com version 0.1 is now live.
Version 1.0 will be 10X better, but even at 0.1 itâs better than Wikipedia imo.
148
142
2,507
496,158
We live in the sort of world that has elite pedophile rings in it.
Holy crap. Really. This is happening in our world, not some fictional story. This world.
I sure as hell didn't know that before. Did you? This was HUGE news to me. Soul-shattering, horrific news.
146
443
1,210
BTW, President Trump could get this ball rolling just as well:
Hi, @realDonaldTrumpâco-founder of Wikipedia hereâcould I persuade you to use an executive order to make it a policy that neither federal worker hours nor federal moneys may be used to edit Wikipedia or pay for Wikipedia editing?
Thanks in advance. (I voted for you.)
20
75
2,329
621,928
Each of the novels below has 20,000+ reviews on Amazon.
Maybe young ladies are going crazy because theyâre fantasizing about sex with demons? Letâs just say this is not good.
137
121
2,226
1,112,532
Compare how Britannica and Wikipedia introduce the traditional system of Indian medicine called Ayerveda.
Britannica is respectful.
Wikipedia has no fewer than four dismissive epithets in the first paragraph: "quackery," "pseudoscientific," "protoscience," and "unscientific."
You are right Mr Larry
Compare Wiki vs Britannica. Britannica sure has lot of biases but If you match what is written on Wiki page vs link quoted. You will be amazed to see how Wiki spreads not knowledge but missinformation and propoganda nitter.app/1CelestialTruth/statusâŚ
28
873
2,147
Not taking a position on controversial issues is what defines neutrality. Declaring only one position legitimate, as Wikipedia routinely does, is tantamount to bias. Wikipedians used to know this. Unless they relearn it, they will be left in the dust. Time to reform, Wikipedians!
Wikipedia: "conspiracy theorists claim COVID-19 leaked from a lab"
Grokipedia: "experts are split, here are the sources for the house report on the lab leak and the scientific sentiment studies"
Wow! I'm genuinely incredibly impressed.
I will literally never use Wikipedia again. Grokipedia is clearly much more factual and unbiased, and easier to read source documents.
This is only v0.1!
Elon / xAI really cooked with this one. This will fundamentally reshape the way humans consume knowledge
97
217
2,296
97,856
Iâm delighted that so many seem to be turning to Christ.
Iâm nervous that they may end up turning to a false Christ.
Things are not always what they appear. We will see, we will see.
351
128
2,205
59,006
Read: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:LâŚ
Wikipedia could change. It's not impossible.
But only if you make a lot of noise both on social media and on Wikipedia itself. The current narrative is controlled by a few hundred people. What if 1000s (politely) descended on Wikipedia?
22
164
2,268
107,607
Hi @elonmusk. Congrats on the launch! Impressive work for v0.1! Please publish articles in the standard ZWI file format, so that everyone starts using the Encyclosphere (the superset of all free encyclopedias). See docs.encyclosphere.org
21
91
2,218
324,620
Agreed. There should be an emergency executive/board meeting in response to this and a 180 degree reversal.
25
63
1,999
Thing is, Tucker knows just how much Spacey is despised by his viewers.
Something is up.
Merry Christmas.
253
98
2,010
430,984
There is a massive irony in the fact that Wikipedia is so extremely biased: it was started by someone who cares unusually deeply about neutrality (me), who developed and defended its neutrality policy at great length.
Man makes plans, and God laughs.
38
538
1,848
Look at what Elijah Wood said: nytimes.com/2016/05/25/movieâŚ
Macaulay Culkin:
thewashingtonpundit.com/2019âŚ
Bella Thorne:
theblaze.com/news/former-disâŚ
Dr. Phil:
newshawknetwork.com/investigâŚ
Think R. Kelly. Roman Polanski. Michael Jackson.
Many more.
Where there is smoke, there's fire, I say.
63
502
974
Elon Musk's statement seems like a potential watershed.
There's been a shameless full-court press: The Establishment has done all it can to legitimize flooding countries with illegal immigrants. This propaganda push did its work for over a decade, and we're living with the results. Now liberals think they are obligated to defend open borders or be "racist," but this is increasingly looking indefensible.
This nearly-universal open border policy must end. The badness of the policy is nothing new, as far as I'm concernedâit was a bad idea from the beginning.
When Tolkien wrote about the hobbits, he was referring to the gentlefolk of the English shires, who donât realize the horrors that take place far away.
They were able to live their lives in peace and tranquility, but only because they were protected by the hard men of Gondor.
What happened to the nice man who was brutally murdered while walking his dog will happen to all of England if the tide of illegal immigration is not turned.
It is time for the English to ally with the hard men, like Tommy Robinson, and fight for their survival or they shall surely all die.
26
83
1,980
396,195
12/ Look these up:
NOTE: separate tweet below for each!
The Catholic Church, Pedowood, underage groupies, Jimmy Savile, Rotherham, CPS disappearances, the Kinsey Institute, John of God, NXIVM, the Finders, Marc Dutroux, Laura Silsby...and yes, Pizzagate.
72
407
1,211
6/ This is what you've heard and (if you're like most people) probably already forgotten about. But we are not even close to being done.
Did you know that ABC News had this story in 2016, and covered it up? They did. Everyone knows that, too, but few are talking about it.
26
315
1,246
I think "demonic" is overused and I have rarely used the word, like, ever, but...this is completely demonic.
26
51
1,753
Therefore, the crime that is caught is always only the tip of the iceberg.
When we look at this elite pedophile ring, we must ask: what iceberg lies beneath the surface: in other places, at other times, with other players?
17
291
968
Wikipedia is considering sending "Mass killings under communist regimes" down the memory hole.
You can't make this crap up.
I remember when Jimmy Wales was a libertarian.
108
671
1,670
8/ Right. Think about that. Hard.
More of the story came out last summer. But no one else has been jailed, not even Epstein's chief accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, whose location is unknown. Few in the scandal-crazed media....seem to care much. That's weird, isn't it?
27
298
1,171
Using random violence, aimed at random people and symbols of some hated regime/system, to make political changeâthatâs a serviceable definition of âterrorism.â
TDS has become so severe that it is making terrorists out of left radicals and terrorism supporters out of Democrats.
24
438
1,409
1/ If I were a conspiracy theorist, I might think the ongoing lockdowns, masking, and social distancing, despite almost-zero deaths, is due to a desire to demonstrate to the world how international elites can fraudulently call the shots in defiance of facts and science.
41
476
1,365
You know, facts exist. They will not accommodate themselves to your political sensitivities.
Either there was widespread child sacrifice in the New World before Columbus, or there wasnât.
Considering that human sacrifice was well-known, why assume there wasnât child sacrifice?
When life is cheap, the lives of children are generally especially cheap.
Pointing out facts is not racist. Anyone who says so is to be avoided.
đ¨ JD Vance just claimed that when settlers arrived in the New World, they âfound widespread child sacrifice,â adding that âChristian civilization ended the practice.â
Archaeologists, including those specializing in North American history, are calling this a flat-out lie. There is no evidence of widespread child sacrifice among First Nations.
To say that about Indigenous people is historically false, deeply racist, and disgustingly revisionist.
75
92
1,831
560,346
13/ The Catholic Church has had massive numbers of pedophiles. They never go away. Why not? Why don't the police move in on them? Why has it gone on for *generations*? And there's evidence it's condoned, yes, condoned and organized, within the Church.
58
345
1,116
If all these super-powerful people are capable of systematic child trafficking and abuse in *this* case and at *this* particular period of time, don't you think they and others like them do it in *other* places, and at *other* times?
What, you think this is a one-off?
31
281
866
One reason I love my wife is that she is totally unimpressed that I went on Tucker and was retweeted by Elon. She doesnât give a damn. Quite right.
Find yourself a woman who literally doesnât care what the world thinks.
53
74
1,753
31,833
9/ We the people would learn much more about the suspects and allegations if more court documents were unsealed. But massive numbers of Epstein case documents have been sealed. The court system is protecting the guiltyâagain, as they did in 2008.
They do that a lot, turns out.
14
304
1,117
Unless he's a white Christian.
In that case, demonize the killer with the attention of having his name widely known and associated with the inherent evils of Christian white males.
Right?
Just checking. Want to make sure I'm getting this right.
16
75
1,474
Having many small donors does not guarantee Wikipedia's independence, as this states. It would help if we could identify the largely anonymous administrator corps. How can we know if Wikipedia is independent if we don't know who is calling the shotsâand who they work for?
38
611
1,529
Oh, but this is a one-off thing, you say?
Is it?
Well, what do you think NXIVM was, if not a sex cult that indeed did involve minors? nytimes.com/2019/05/26/nyreg⌠| cbsnews.com/news/keith-ranieâŚ
35
330
825
5/ But I'm just scratching the surface, here. There are hair-curling claims about a "temple" on his island and rites performed in the hill underneath it. You don't have to believe that, to be shocked by Epstein's circle. But the occult connections keeps recurring, disturbingly.
24
283
1,072
We as a society haven't been looking for elite pedophilia rings. Our reporters aren't wired to think that way. Our police, prosecutors, and judges have a hard time conceiving of it. It turns our stomach. It can't exist.
130
248
835
3/ He was arrested (twice) because he was a pedophile who abused many teen girls. He had an island in the Caribbean in which this took place, which, by all credible accounts, was visited by many of his famous friends.
21
292
1,058
Oh, because Wikipediaâs process is sooo transparent and not at all a black box! Nobody is coordinating behind the scenes! Wikipedia has rules against meatpuppetry (off-Wikipedia coordination)âitâs not allowed! So it hardly ever happens! Of course the contributors are just harmless geeks who are all very above-board and very virtuous, only a few bad actors. đ¤¨đ¤Ź
Evaluating whether an article "seems OK" misses the point entirely. The issue isn't surface palatability. It's surrendering verifiable, transparent methodology for black-box AI owned by someone openly hostile to institutional knowledge. Process determines truth-seeking capacity.
22
73
1,676
65,612
Just by the way, I donât actually believe âVox populi, Vox Deiâ (the voice of the people is the voice of God) and now I wonder if I have taken the Lordâs name in vain! đŠ
142
32
1,635
113,097
7/ Did you know that it was covered up in a different way last 2008, when Epstein was sentenced to a mere slap on the wrist?
Why on earth, in the name of all that is holy? "Because he's so powerful and has powerful friends to protect," you say.
21
250
1,009
4/ There is courtroom evidence that Epstein's friends sexually abused the teen girls he collected, who as young as 12 were basically sex slaves.
19
283
1,001
And let's break it down.
Our elites: people like billionaire financiers, famous politicians, celebrity entertainers, even famous scientists and professors.
THOSE people.
Some few participate in *organized* child abuse.
26
239
728
11/ It sure sounds like (a) many of the Beautiful People know about child sex trafficking by elites, (b) some participate in it, and (c) the media and courts cover it up.
"But...systematically? Do they really? Surely not," you say.
Sadly this happens over...and over...and over.
49
277
984
These are, in fact, very reasonable, commonsense proposals from anybody's point of view. We can put pressure on Wikipedia at all levels to adopt them. If they do nothing or refuse to change, there will be consequences.
23
96
1,588
112,441
A good example of Wikipediaâs bias can be seen in this example. Iâm an advisor of BitChute, the free speech video platform.
Wikipedia says BC is full of mostly extremist nonsense, clickbait, and conspiracy theories. I donât think this is true, or I wouldnât be involved. Representatives of BC have attempted to persuade those squatting on the article to allow libertarian and conservative perspectives about the video platform to be included (alongside the current, GASP perspective), but they refuse.
Very frustrating.
31
128
1,563
151,015
Twitter has announced that it will take the bold step of quite openly and proudly censoring certain "world leaders" when those leaders say things that Twitter finds naughty.
Yep. Twitter is now a political censor. For reals.
Well, that's it.
141
708
1,108
10/ Now, think. This doesn't take evidence, it takes a little bit of brave thinking.
What must our beloved and distinguished world of famous, rich, and powerful people be like, if Epstein's friends (THOSE people!) are violating teen sex slavesâand the courts *protect* them?
12
257
980
I found it: bitchute.com/video/NkiM9fo1BâŚ
52
562
1,086
