On Friday, I met with the Cheshire Police and Crime Commissioner, Dan Price. I entered that meeting willing to set aside party politics, despite Mr Price having publicly suggested that I and my constituents had fabricated reports of serious crime and antisocial behaviour linked to asylum seekers in HMOs. I believed that building a professional relationship would best serve local residents. In hindsight, that was a naïve aspiration on my part.
Mr Price has shown that his loyalty lies with the Labour Party and Keir Starmer, rather than with the impartial responsibilities that his role demands. In my view, a Police and Crime Commissioner should not conduct themselves in a party-political manner.
During the meeting, we discussed one HMO where six separate crime reference numbers had been issued by Cheshire Police in relation to different incidents. I made clear that many more such cases exist. We presented screenshots from CCTV footage already submitted to the police, and we discussed the growing number of residents, both within and outside my constituency, who have come to me in desperation. These people are not concerned with politics and they’re certainly not lying; they simply want to feel safe in their own homes.
At the beginning of the meeting, Mr Price acknowledged that HMO-related crime is a policing priority. This admission was curious, as he had previously claimed that I was misleading the public by raising the issue, and the matter does not appear in his published policing priorities. He also confirmed that he is not given, and does not receive, operational details from frontline officers. I explained that my obligations under the General Data Protection Regulations prevent me from sharing most of the evidence with him as a political PCC, as it contains personal data belonging to constituents.
In light of Mr Price’s conduct, I will not be engaging with him further. In my view, he represents an unnecessary and ongoing cost to the taxpayer, and his behaviour raises legitimate questions about whether the role of Police and Crime Commissioner is needed at all. Instead, we will seek a meeting with the Chief Constable, who we expect to be free from party-political interference. Subject to appropriate assurances regarding confidentiality and protection, I will invite affected constituents to attend that meeting and share their experiences directly with the Chief Constable.
It is clear that Mr Price is more interested in defending the Labour Party’s record than in supporting the victims of crime. That is deeply disappointing. However, it only strengthens my determination to continue fighting for the safety and dignity of my constituents, and to stand up for those who have been let down by a system that places political loyalty above public protection.