Key Employee Retention Payment Source: document.epiq11.com/document…

What about this wallet: terra1wqwfwh797tf77e2xpvy9xx082pwpxxlm9x4xws It has 20mil LUNA. That's 2% of total LUNA supply, owned by you. If it doesn't belong to you, why was it used to submit a proposal authored by you? finder.terra.money/classic/t…

hey @crunchbase do you know why was @raoufbenhar removed from the @stride_zone seed round page? He was listed here crunchbase.com/funding_round… up until recently and personal investment section is now missing as well.

So where does the 5.5B fine being requested by the SEC in the case against @terra_money ? The amount is based on SEC documented claims of 4.2B in $MIR, $LUNA, and $UST sales (from mostly signed contracts) resulting in net profits sent to TFL Source: storage.courtlistener.com/re…

In 2021, .@zmanian, the CEO of Iqlusion, hired two developers to help develop the @cosmoshub blockchain: "Jun Kai" and "Sarawut Sanit." "I talked to them almost every day for a year," said Manian. "They did the work. And I was, frankly, pretty pleased." Eventually, Manian got a call from the FBI about suspicious transfers stemming from Iqlusion's blockchain wallets. It turned out that Kai and Sanit had been funneling all of their wages from Iqlusion to the DPRK. CoinDesk traced the funds to two DPRK nationals sanctioned by OFAC in 2023. 8/

It's astonishing how many people rush to 'invest' their money—and eventually lose it—in a coin just because a mainstream influencer promotes it When they lose their money, they shouldn't cry, because they are victims of their own stupidity This also speaks volumes about how little the space has matured over the years; teams developing real applications have to beg for funding while people willingly send their money to celebrities You can't make this shit up.

To wade into the details on how Risk Harbor now Karak acquired the 200M USTC from the aUST Underwriting Contract. They executed an administrative backdoor without disclosure to withdraw the community funds deposited into the vault by the Ozone multisig. finder.terra.money/classic/t…

Announcement of Chain Support Discontinuation Mintscan will terminate support for the following chains effective December 31st, 2024: - Comdex (@ComdexOfficial) - Ki Chain (@Ki_Foundation) - Lum Network (@lum_network) - Provenance (@provenancefdn) We sincerely thank you for your understanding and continued support. Please note that although Mintscan will be discontinued for these chains, validator(@CosmostationVD) and wallet(@IBCwallet) services will remain fully supported.

Two wallets attributed to @stablekwon are active again: On May 6th 2023 terra1wqwfwh797tf77e2xpvy9xx082pwpxxlm9x4xws claimed staking/vesting rewards and sent all of the 1.55 Million $LUNA to Binance terrasco.pe/mainnet/tx/A4736…

Giving you a list of validators that really wants @StargazeZone $STARS going to 0 These would mostly think it's normal to have anything in $STARS and only so the only incentivise people have is to have a dump token Lack of knowledge, interest and development for the chain they are validating Sad time

C'mon really ?

Lobo (Wolfcontract) alt wallet - mintscan.io/juno/account/jun…

If your @cosmos @osmosis or @StargazeZone account is eligible for the Namada RPGF drop, you will see a notification on your @keplrwallet A big shoutout to the @chainapsis / KEPLR team for supporting the shielded community 🔭

Another bridge down, another crazy asset price! $DOT As the bridge to transfer $DOT between Polkadot and Osmosis is down, look what's happened to the $DOT price on Osmosis! $DOT on Osmosis = $7.23 Regular $DOT = $4.09 Basically, don't buy $DOT on Osmosis right now. The bridge is set to resume next week, and this Arb should finally be closeable then!

Distribution of $LVN among recipients 3/ - The 9 addresses in the 100k- range, own the 25.58% of the airdropped amount - Even more concerning is that the top 2 addresses have received over 750k tokens each. - This makes them the owners of 15.24% of the airdropped amount

Yes, as we discussed in the past, the code we reviewed at commit hash 0dd20ab4c7a9d4cd0715d49cc518f9037fb62152 did not contain an allowlist. The contract deployed at finder.terra.money/classic/a… uses another version of the codebase which we did not review.

The settlement consent agreements of @terra_money and @stablekwon have been released which appear to be a complete capitulation to the SEC summary request for Judgement from the Civil Trial. TFL agreed to liquidate assets & wind down operations with a plan due on June 30th, 2024

It's About MONEY AADAO’s announcement to sunset today is surprising. Yesterday, they said they'd defer the decision to 01/25. Anyway clarity is good. But their reason is bogus. The primary drivers influencing their decision stem from lack of legit purpose and unrealistic compensation expectations. It's about money. Mandate Challenges: AADAO has failed to define a concrete, actionable purpose. The current mandate of "value accrual for ATOM" is both abstract and ineffective; w/ subjective interpretations of value, ambiguous ROI metrics, and untenable links bw DAO activities and $ATOM price impact. From pilot, they set themselves up for failure by pumping you on their ability to pump your bags. Ngmi Attempts to pivot mandate have been paralyzed by uncertainty due to lack of vision as to what the hub needs and leadership shortcomings writ large. Recruitment and Bonuses: Contributors were recruited under premature and half baked bonus assurances -- the execution of half baked was challenged bc their convoluted scheme to utilize public resources was ripe w COIs; lacked LOGIC and approval from the community (missing KPIs). This misrepresentation created dumb expectations that evidently proved unfeasible. That's on DAO leadership and the contributors who conflate possibility with an irresponsible promise. And w/o "bonuses" -- they can't obscure their actual/possible comp behind relatively low-ish salaries...bc oversight insists salaries must be shared. Cue: "you're obstructing ops efficiency!" BC Bonus is Non-Viable Compensation Tool: Obviously, w/o objectively clear mandate or measurable KPIs, contributors struggle w defining individual and team success. So the team decided to relinquish their bonuses, returning the balance of 88k bonus $ATOM to cp. Who stays, who goes is fundamentally about how much one gets paid. The non-viability of bonuses for the current year, or in prospective renewal translates into disinterest. Salary Increase: With bonuses off the table, the only way to bump up comp is through salary increases. On 10/31, salary increases (27% on average) for eight contributors went into effect. Initially, contributors sought an average increase of 36%, and the increases were proposed w/o consistent or defensible logic (recurring issue). The increases also exceeded the comp tiers established via hub gov. Due to oversight guidance, the in-demand increases were modified to stay w/in 865 pay parameters -- but the discussions were unreasonably challenging. AADAO also opposed oversight’s insistence that planned increases should be disclosed transparently to community. No bueno. Sounds like fr commitment to transparency. After 5.5 months, I can say the pattern of org behavior leans towards information withholding. Conclusion: Blaming oversight is weak and disappointing. Despite recent salary bump, the majority still believe their pay is inadequate for keep. There's a real disconnect between what they want versus what they can get. Hence "sunset". Still room for a new team to step up with a revised mandate. Just know, unlikely pay can be more than what contributors get now. For updated comp #s, see 👇 #Cosmos Full post about this: forum.cosmos.network/t/sunse…

🚨Biggest BackBoneLabs Airdrop Announcement🚨 As you may be aware, BBL is set to distribute 9% of the total supply of $LAB tokens among the Gravedigger communities Out of this 9%, BBL will allocate 1% for marketing, engagement activities, attracting more users, and more. The remaining 8% will be distributed among all holders of @Skeleton_Punks , @Migaloo_Whales , and @KUJIRANSNFT on the Mígaloo Zone. This means that, based on today's value, we are airdropping $375,000 among our holders. Yes, you read that correctly. Each NFT you hold from this collection in your wallet or in staking, qualifies you for a share of this airdrop. The only requirement is that you must register your wallet at app.backbonelabs.io/elysiumg… before April 13th As of now (though this may vary), each NFT you hold will entitle you to approximately 0.7 $LAB. This means you still have time to get: Skeleton Punks (Terra): necropolisnft.io/collections… Migaloo Whales (Mígaloo Zone): necropolisnft.io/collections… Or migrate some Kujirans to Mígaloo: stargaze.zone/m/stars17fd0yu… Seize the opportunity to receive some $LAB tokens from the airdrop and mint your @madscientists_x Play your cards right, as there are many opportunities out there

Giving you a list of validators that really wants @StargazeZone $STARS going to 0 These would mostly think it's normal to have anything in $STARS and only so the only incentivise people have is to have a dump token Lack of knowledge, interest and development for the chain they are validating Sad time

You have an open source explorer forum.cosmos.network/t/fundi… asking for a grant of $250K, for work done all the time open sourced, never giving up and with few validators ranked mid-bottom of the list Then you have this: forum.cosmos.network/t/propo… DYOR.

1/3 @Interchain_io was part of @CelestiaOrg seed round. Seed raised $1.5M for a 15.9% allocation. ICF apparently led the round, so assume they were in for $500K. So ICF's alloc is 53M TIA. At TIA price of ~$6, ICF's TIA worth more than the rest of its treasury combined 🤯

3/3 To maintain transparency and traceability, LFG funds will remain trackable on the LFG Reserves dashboard: lookerstudio.google.com/u/0/…

1/ AADAO is proud to announce the first batch of grants for 2024: Asteroid Protocol, Everstake, Lava Network & Cosmoverse. Each project aims to advance the @cosmoshub through improved infrastructure, expanded use cases & increased on-chain activity.

And this is the people that $ATOM pays for 💀💀💀

$STARS has seen another 2 red weeks with the price of it declining by almost 40%. Many people asked me who is responsible for all of this selling. So I decided to take another look at some data & see if we can find an explanation for the latest price action $STARS. 📊⬇️

So @fleece_cannon document.epiq11.com/document… Seriously amateur

Dear community, As some of you know, with TFL losing the trial, @pulsarfinance is now for sale. I'm reaching out to ask for your help in sharing this message.. We're in a tricky spot and we need to find a new home for the team. Here's why everyone should invest in us 👇

In my role contributing to @archwayHQ, I spend a lot of time thinking about strategy. However, I can’t figure out why the @cosmos ecosystem can’t gain wider adoption. When you examine the data below, it seems like there is a ceiling of around 30k daily active accounts (DAA) for Cosmos. You might argue that Cosmos doesn’t have good products, but I would argue they are at feature parity with other L2/Solana/Move projects. You could argue that Cosmos projects don’t market well to the Ethereum community, but I would argue that @injective and @SeiNetwork have done a good job positioning themselves. Yet, on-chain DAA numbers are still fraction of those of other L2s. Returning to Archway, this year we are focusing on building quality dApps. While most ecosystem dApps are still in their early stages, they are likely to be very good within a year, based on the speed of iterations and the capacity of our eco. However, I still can’t help but think that good dApps alone won’t be enough. Mintscan data shows the following: - Stargaze (NFT mkt): ~3k DAA - Osmosis (DEX): ~9k DAA - DyDx (perps): ~1.5k DAA So, the question is: How does Cosmos grow its user base?

1/ Today I woke up with people criticizing how Juno Reserve is/was spent I want to share something: do you know why USDC is not in our reserves? Because of your criticism. The reason why during early times we didn’t diversified the reserve is because of the fear of your opinion

Maybe @fleece_cannon & @terra_money can explain why they asked for a 150M $LUNA Community Grant without disclosure they were borrowing to what is now 450M in debt from a subsidiary company "Terraform Labs Limited" which dissolved in July 2023?

There is still 200M more $USTC that belong back in the Community pool. The funds were taken off-chain from the underwriting contract by @riskharbor between July 15th and August 11 2022 without governance vote or consent of the community. These are the transactions: