As someone who has done countless interviews in LoL and VALORANT, I agree with this tenfold.
At the end of the day, itโs on you to recognize the state a playerโs in and the approach you should take with that in mind.
I interviewed him after a loss so I should know.
[TW: SERIOUS TWEET FOR ONCE]
A few thoughts on the interviewerโKeria drama today.
First off:
> Whatever you think of me, I was the interviewer who blew up because I brought a unique emotional intelligence to out-of-broadcast interviews: something the scene was lacking. So on this topic I know what Iโm talking about.
> I have the unique position, at least in comparison to most people chiming in on this, of having over 30 videos of players flooding tears out of their eyes on my home PC. Most if not all have never seen the light of day.
> I find it difficult to view myself, but I am told constantly by people, that they felt they could pursue interviews from a โcontent creationโ POV rather than purely Journalistic โ because of me.
> Conversely, I think I was just the first respondent to a coming wave, rather than someone who changed anything. So I think I can give perspective on this โnew waveโ of interviewers.
I say all of this to qualify my opinion on this topic. I can be a pretty arrogant guy, but all of my outward validation for myself mostly comes from deep insecurity. However, interviewing is something that I truly believe, for the niche category of, Out of Broadcast - League of Legends interviewing, I was the best in the World for a time.
Self-masturbatory victory lap over. Letโs unpack this.
โ
Interviews are a really hard thing to do well in League. For every false assessed diatribe about how emotionally underdeveloped players are on Twitter, there are a million more complexities that lie beneath the surface.
Process as such should always come from unpacking this complexity and delivering it in a way that doesnโt harm the athletes. Difficult conversations at times must be had, but when these conversations are failed to be had, it is always more helpful to look upon oneโs shortcomings as a communicator perhaps, rather than looking at the athletes unwillingness to communicate.
I say this because I can be honest, the first 2 years of chasing spotlight, via the access that Riot grants, is purely intoxicating. You are out for the views, the respect of industry figures, the encouragement from your riot reps, team reps, fellow journalists. So naturally you become geared for the big scoop, the big moment where a player reveals the big elephant in the room, talks about something difficult.
This is something you have to quell within yourself as time goes on, but even at First Stand 2025, my 6th or so event? I still felt this way. I think when you see the older journalists, they have this of course, but the younger ones have all of it in spades, with no subtlety, such is the nature of our social media. Iโm guilty of this also.
Because the players is what are important. As much as you can become clouded by metrics, you have to view yourself as a sort of supplementary guide for the storyline, at your best you can help influence the broadcast narrative, or even maybe foster a talking point between players. At worst, youโre tossing the coals of a fire that has burnt for many years, participating.
And players wonโt always give you what you want. I look at my Faker interview in 2024 as like, despite being my most viewed interview, not being a very good interview, he didnโt give me much at all. But conversely I recognise that as a response to issues that he had faced at the hands of other interviews, irresponsibility of emotional intelligence that led to him being clammed up and guarded.
But you should never think to react as that being the players fault. They donโt owe you anything. Even if you travelled, put yourself up, any of this. You can put some onus on Riot for giving you a certain amount of access, or push for transparency on what access youโll get. But once youโre in that interview room. Whatever happens is on you.