if the majority of people aren't at the same level you are, then it is a high standard mathematically.
the problem is what women value is not what men value. so what women are achieving doesn't make them valuable to men.
what narrow perceptions? it's pretty easy. you like the same sex exclusively? homosexual. you like the opposite exclusively? heterosexual. you like both? bisexual. easy. nothing wrong with any of those, no need to change things
brains aren't dimorphic. there isn't an objective male or female brain. there are brains that tend toward the norm of the other sex, but are still within the distribution of the the sex of the body.
if there was we could objectively measure if someone was trans
yes. no.
you can entirely hurt someone without know what is done is any kind of wrong. the person committing harm doesn't have to be aware they are to harm.
you are classifying degree of harm. i am not.
she literally said she hopes someone brings a guillotine and kills all you mother fuckers. that's specific and referred to all the people she was speaking to.
which means you are ignoring those concerns.
no, not everyone has the mental space for growth at present. they may in the future, but some people don't in the moment
it's not really bigoted to not want to be around males while changing.
if that is bigoted, then not wanting to be around men while changing is bigoted, and trans women are bigots
great. so the man and his partner didn't decide to not have an abortion. only the partner did. so it's the partners responsibility to care for the child they chose to have. not the man