I support the right to protest in Australia, including calling for an end to the war in Gaza. However, it was profoundly disturbing to see an enormous portrait of mass-murdering Iranian dictator Ayatollah Khamenei, holding a rifle no less, positioned directly behind the group of prominent Australians leading the march. Did this front line of protesters look behind them? Were they and their advisers aware of the presence of this potent symbol, positioned as it was to ensure maximum media coverage and, for Khamenei and the Iranian regime, maximum propaganda value?
This same image of Khamenei + rifle became one of the core propaganda motifs splashed across IRIB state media programming in the days following Qasem Soleimani's assassination in 2020, at the time viewed from my solitary confinement cell. For me it was triggering (pun intended) and I can't imagine how upsetting it must have been for the many thousands of Iranian refugees and other victims of the regime's brutal violence who now call Australia home.
It seems almost too obvious to have to state: Australians can oppose the starvation and bloodshed in Gaza, and call for an end to the war, without having to make common cause with one of the Middle East's worst human rights abusers and perpetrators of mass atrocities.
I'm not convinced that everyone in the front row of the protest knew what was being waved behind their heads. I do hope however that those who were pictured marching in front of Khamenei's portrait denounce the presence of this image, which after all tarnishes their cause and all that they stand for. The old adage of 'my enemy's enemy' should be rejected by anyone who genuinely cares about Palestinian rights, or human rights more broadly. You can be an enemy of Israel without having to make the Iranian regime your friend.