Last night our attorneys at Davis Polk sent a letter to the SEC arguing that approval of #Bitcoin futures-based ETFs, but not #Bitcoin spot-based ETFs, like $GBTC, is “arbitrary and capricious,” and therefore in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
We just filed @Grayscale Ethereum Trust's amended Form 19b-4 filing. This is an important step in our effort to uplist $ETHE to NYSE Arca.
Investors want and deserve access to #Ethereum in the form of a spot Ethereum ETF and we believe the case is just as strong as it was for spot #Bitcoin ETFs.
nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/mar…
1/ Recently, there’s been a lot of chatter about spot #Ethereum ETFs. I personally am not deterred by it and believe the ETFs should be approved. But right now I want to talk about how I think perceived “lack of SEC engagement” should be viewed at this point:
@Grayscale will soon file the next brief in our suit challenging SEC's decision to deny $GBTC conversion to a spot #Bitcoin#ETF. The case is moving swiftly. While timing is uncertain, oral arguments may be as soon as Q2. Final decision in DC Cir. App. Court could come by Fall.🧵
"If the SEC loses its case against @Grayscale, as we expect, the path of least resistance would be a wave of simultaneous approvals for all spot #Bitcoin ETF applicants -- including Grayscale and the other eight active filings." @NYCStein in @Bloomberg today. Cc @EricBalchunas@JSeyff$GBTC
Our attorneys at @DavisPolkReg have sent a new letter to the SEC updating our arguments that approval of #Bitcoin futures #ETFs, but not #Bitcoin spot #ETFs like $GBTC would be “arbitrary and capricious” and “unfair discrimination” in violation of the APA and Exchange Act.
Last night our attorneys at Davis Polk sent a letter to the SEC arguing that approval of #Bitcoin futures-based ETFs, but not #Bitcoin spot-based ETFs, like $GBTC, is “arbitrary and capricious,” and therefore in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
This is a new argument in the context of $BTC ETFs that wasn’t possible until the approval of the first #Bitcoin futures-based #ETF and subsequent rejection of yet another spot-based ETF. So, what is this new argument?:
“Grayscale last week sued the SEC for violating the APA. It has a strong argument that the SEC’s disparate treatment of spot and futures bitcoin ETPs contravenes the law’s requirement that regulators treat similar products and parties the same.” wsj.com/articles/gary-gensle…
The APA requires the SEC to treat *like* situations *alike* absent a reasonable basis for different treatment. This means the SEC must treat similarly situated investment products similarly.
6/ Investors want and deserve access to #Ethereum in the form of a spot Ethereum ETF and Grayscale believes the case is just as strong as it was for spot #Bitcoin ETFs. We look forward to engaging with the Commission on these important products. $ETHE
1/ As part of our suit challenging the SEC's decision to deny $GBTC conversion to a spot #bitcoin#ETF, @Grayscale just filed our Reply Brief with the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. Here’s what you need to know:
Thank you to Joe Hall, Annette Nazareth, Jai Massari, Greg Rowland, Zach Zweihorn, Paul Mishkin, Daniel Schwartz and the rest of the Davis Polk team; @RepTomEmmer & @RepDarrenSoto; and everyone else who has been supporting @grayscale in its mission to convert $GBTC into an #ETF.
#Bitcoin ETF products -- Bitcoin futures-based ETFs registered under the ‘40 Act and Bitcoin spot-based ETFs registered under the ‘33 Act -- are an example of two *like* situations that should be treated *alike*… but are no longer.
Tonight @Grayscale filed a Petition for Review with the DC Circuit Court of Appeals challenging the SEC's decision to deny $GBTC conversion to a spot #Bitcoin#ETF. Our challenge builds off our previous arguments under the APA and Exchange Act:
globenewswire.com/news-relea…
Our attorneys at @DavisPolkReg have sent a new letter to the SEC updating our arguments that approval of #Bitcoin futures #ETFs, but not #Bitcoin spot #ETFs like $GBTC would be “arbitrary and capricious” and “unfair discrimination” in violation of the APA and Exchange Act.
The entire @grayscale team is reading this tn and I encourage you to do the same. This speech precisely delineates why our team is working to convert $GBTC to a spot #Bitcoin#ETF - told from the perspective of a top regulator that actively engages with the #crypto industry.
And there goes $GBTC, making it journey through the gears of financial plumbing, on its way from OTC Markets, up to NYSE Arca
For details and disclosures, visit etfs.grayscale.com/gbtc
1/ Yesterday @Grayscale sent a comment letter to $GBTC and other spot #bitcoin ETF files restating that the SEC is in a position to approve all spot bitcoin ETFs *now*, and also commenting on the recently proposed SSAs. This thread clarifies some high-level points of the letter:
Arguments citing the added protections of the ‘40 Act vs. ‘33 Act or CME bitcoin futures being more “regulated” than spot bitcoin - are misplaced in the context of Bitcoin ETF approvals.
3/ All of these issues were figured out and are identical when comparing spot #Bitcoin to #Ethereum ETFs. The only difference is rather than the ETF holding bitcoin, it holds ether. So in many ways, the SEC already has engaged and issuers simply have less to engage on this time.
5/ Further, I 100% agree w what others like @iampaulgrewal and @BrianQuintenz have said about why spot #Ethereum ETFs should be approved: consistency w ETH futures ETFs, regulation of ETH futures as commodity futures (vs. security futures), high correlation btw futures and spot.
4/ Perhaps I will feel differently as we get closer to final approve/deny dates in late May 2024, but at this point, I don’t think perceived lack of engagement from regulators should be indicative of one outcome or another.
1/ There’s been a lot of conversation about @BlackRock’s filings for a spot #bitcoin#ETF. As there should be. The world’s largest asset manager ($8.6t AUM) entering bitcoin is a major milestone that underscores the maturity of #Bitcoin as an asset and its market structure.
2/ In the final months leading up to #Bitcoin ETF approval, @Grayscale and others received positive and constructive engagement from the SEC. We had thoughtful conversations and discussed the finer details of creation/redemption procedures, cash v. in-kind, APs, LPs, custody etc.
I have now read through all 200+! comment letters (yes all of them) submitted on behalf of $GBTC conversion into a spot #bitcoin#ETF
Some common themes across submissions:
Well now our argument that approval of #Bitcoin futures-based ETFs, but not #Bitcoin spot-based ETFs like $GBTC is “arbitrary and capricious” just got a lot more interesting...
sec.gov/rules/sro/nysearca/2…
Last night our attorneys at Davis Polk sent a letter to the SEC arguing that approval of #Bitcoin futures-based ETFs, but not #Bitcoin spot-based ETFs, like $GBTC, is “arbitrary and capricious,” and therefore in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Mark your calendars. Oral Arguments in our case challenging SEC decision to deny $GBTC conversion to a spot #bitcoin ETF was just scheduled for
*Tuesday, March 7, 2023 @ 930 AM EST*.
Bitcoin futures vs. Bitcoin spot and ‘40 Act vs. ‘33/'34 Acts are regulatory distinctions without a difference in the context of #Bitcoin#ETF approvals. Thank you for your continued support @RepTomEmmer and @FallonLizzy! $GBTC
We received a response from SEC Chair Gensler to our 11/3/21 letter regarding BTC spot ETFs. This issue remains a priority for us and we will continue to oversee the SEC in its mission to maintain fair and orderly markets and facilitate capital formation.
1/ What a week! I’ve finally had time to settle down and put down some thoughts about @Grayscale’s big win in our lawsuit challenging the SEC’s denial of $GBTC's conversion to a spot #bitcoin ETF. Heading into LDW, here's a short thread on what I think it means and what is next🧵
1/ This week concluded Oral Arguments in our suit to convert $GBTC to a spot #bitcoin ETF – a culmination of our 19b-4 Filing same-day the first bitcoin futures ETF began trading, 11.5k+ supportive Comment Letters, Petition for Review same-day of Denial and written Briefs & Amici
As we inch closer to the March 7 Oral Arguments date for our $GBTC lawsuit, I couldn't help but revisit @HesterPeirce's all encompassing speech on the history of #Bitcoin ETFs. Her grand dissent sheds light on the importance of embracing innovation and allowing investors access to this emerging asset class. I summarize below, but I highly recommend reading in full. Have a nice weekend.
The entire @grayscale team is reading this tn and I encourage you to do the same. This speech precisely delineates why our team is working to convert $GBTC to a spot #Bitcoin#ETF - told from the perspective of a top regulator that actively engages with the #crypto industry.
Spending this President's Day reviewing all the Court documents in our DC Circuit lawsuit to convert $GBTC to a spot #bitcoin ETF. Here's a powerful line from our Opening Brief:
"At bottom, the Commission has arbitrarily rewarded bitcoin-futures ETPs for being vulnerable to two theoretical sources of fraud or manipulation—misconduct in the bitcoin futures market and misconduct in the spot bitcoin market—while arbitrarily penalizing spot-bitcoin ETPs for being exposed only to one...In ignoring that reality, the Commission has reached an unreasoned decision that unfairly discriminates between issuers in violation of the Exchange Act, see 15 U.S.C. § 78f(b)(5)—exactly what the APA forbids."
grayscale.com/wp-content/upl…
9/ We will continue to keep our community apprised of developments in the litigation. The next milestone will be our final briefs due Feb. 2. While timing is uncertain, oral arguments may be as soon as Q2, final decision in DC Cir. App. Court could come by Fall.
4/ The SEC arbitrarily treats spot #bitcoin ETFs differently from #bitcoin futures ETFs, even though both derive their pricing from the same underlying spot #bitcoin markets, as evidenced by *near perfect* (99.9%) correlations:
@iampaulgrewal and @coinbase’s comment letter was a key component in Grayscale v SEC, which ultimately led to #bitcoin ETF approval.
Thank you for your continued support and leadership now on #ethereum ETFs Paul and Coinbase team.
Looking forward to giving the read!
Today @coinbase responded to @SECGov's request for comment on the proposed @Grayscale Ether Trust ($ETHE) ETP. 27 pages and 96 citations that provide the (1) legal, (2) technical, and (3) economic rationale for approval. 1/6
1. $GBTC conversion to an #ETF is in the public’s best interest.
2. Conversion will allow it to better track NAV, reducing discounts and premiums.
3. Conversion will allow #America to stay competitive. We’re falling behind other nations.
4. It’s nonsensical to approve #bitcoin futures #ETFs but not spot #bitcoin#ETFs
5. #American investors want and deserve the freedom to invest in #crypto through safe and secure manners!
7/ Our proposal to convert $GBTC to a spot #bitcoin#ETF satisfies the requirements of the Exchange Act because it is designed to prevent fraud and manipulation, while protecting investors and the public interest.
6/ The test in and of itself exceeds the SEC’s statutory authority and is arbitrary and unreasoned. The test is deeply flawed, essentially rewarding $BTC futures for being subject to two kinds of risks, while penalizing spot bitcoin for being subject to only one of those risks.
6/ Americans want and deserve spot #bitcoin ETFs, as they would further open up access to $BTC for those that want to hold it in the form of a security, in their brokerage or retirement account, thru regulated investment vehicles, with SEC reports, audited financials and tax docs
The reason why these spot #bitcoin ETF delays aren't all coming out at once, is because for every copy and paste, someone has to make sure they properly change the:
-Issuer name
-Exchange name
-Release and File numbers
-Dates of filing
-Date of next approve/deny/delay day
It's meticulous work, but it's the process. Nothing unusual.
5/ The “significant market test” used in the context of #bitcoin ETFs, and only bitcoin ETFs, has been applied arbitrarily: in a relaxed manner for bitcoin futures ETFs, but a strict manner for spot bitcoin ETFs to get to a results-driven conclusion.
Yesterday five amicus briefs were filed in support of @Grayscale's Petition for Review challenging SEC's decision to deny $GBTC conversion to a spot #Bitcoin#ETF.
This week @Grayscale filed our opening brief with the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. This is the first major milestone since we filed the Petition for Review challenging SEC's decision to deny $GBTC conversion to a spot #Bitcoin#ETF back in June.
5/ Did the SEC act arbitrarily and capriciously, and discriminate against issuers, in denying the conversion of $GBTC to a spot #bitcoin#ETF after it approved ETFs that hold bitcoin futures (a derivative of $BTC)?
That’s it.
8/ Although #bitcoin may be a relatively new asset, the legal issue here is straightforward. We further break down these arguments in our post here with brief attached: grayscale.com/gbtc-lawsuit-g…
2/ This is the next major milestone since we filed the Petition for Review back in June, our Opening Brief in October, and the SEC’s Reply Brief in December. I shared a lot of important additional context earlier this week:
@Grayscale will soon file the next brief in our suit challenging SEC's decision to deny $GBTC conversion to a spot #Bitcoin#ETF. The case is moving swiftly. While timing is uncertain, oral arguments may be as soon as Q2. Final decision in DC Cir. App. Court could come by Fall.🧵
8/ So if you’re long #Bitcoin – whether that’s because you self-custody your private key(s) on a piece of paper, cryptosteel, hardware wallet, a brainwallet in your head, or entrust them to a third party – I encourage you to support our #ETF case.
If you agree with these arguments, there’s no better way to ensure your voice is heard than to write to the SEC as they consider $GBTC’s #ETF conversion. We’ve made it simple to do: grayscale.com/comment
3/ In contrast to our Opening Brief, this Reply Brief is significantly shorter (41 pages vs. 100 pages) and addresses counterpoints made by the SEC in their brief, while also re-emphasizing key substantive arguments from our Opening Brief.
Here are some examples:
9/ But this case is *most important* for the 850k+ shareholders who hold $GBTC. That’s because we expect converting GBTC to a spot #bitcoin ETF to effectively close the current discount to NAV and unlock over $4 billion of value.
And now we all transition from incessantly refreshing the DC Circuit's website, to incessantly refreshing the SEC's NYSE Arca, NASDAQ and CboeBZX SRO websites Cc @EricBalchunas@JSeyff
26/ The #Bitcoin and #Crypto communities should celebrate these developments. Many of us have long believed that Bitcoin is here to stay, and continued institutional adoption of this asset class further cements this reality. We’ve never been closer to spot bitcoin ETFs in the US.
7/ We will continue to do whatever it takes to convert $GBTC to a spot #bitcoin ETF on behalf of nearly 1 million investors across all 50 states. For further discussion of these topics, visit the blog we published about the comment letter here: grayscale.com/grayscales-lat…
Today Grayscale rang the bell for GBTC and we're looking forward to ringing many more bells in the future!
For details and disclosures about Grayscale #Bitcoin Trust, visit: etfs.grayscale.com/gbtc
7/ That may not be you, and that's okay, but if you support the Bitcoin protocol, I think it's clear why you would want more ways for people to access $BTC –
even if they're wrapped in something else on a 1:1 basis. We are fighting for all those who believe in #Bitcoin's future
3. As a result, we believe that not approving $GBTC conversion to an #ETF would be “arbitrary and capricious” and “unfair discrimination” and therefore in violation of the APA and Exchange Act.
2/ A lot has happened in the #crypto industry since we first filed our lawsuit in June ‘22, but I continue to believe in the strength and merits of our common sense and compelling legal arguments:
This week @Grayscale filed our opening brief with the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. This is the first major milestone since we filed the Petition for Review challenging SEC's decision to deny $GBTC conversion to a spot #Bitcoin#ETF back in June.
4/ That means events and speculation surrounding Terra/LUNA, 3AC, Celsius, Voyager, FTX, Alameda, BlockFi, Genesis Capital, Gemini, DCG, or anyone else are *not* relevant to the ultimate question the Court will have to answer:
$BTC futures are priced based on spot bitcoin. If you're OK with one then you have to be OK with the other. It's that simple. Stop picking winners and losers and give investors a choice! Thank you @RepTomEmmer & @RepDarrenSoto for your leadership and support on this issue. $GBTC
Today I sent a letter to @GaryGensler with my @blockcaucus co-chair @RepDarrenSoto about Bitcoin ETFs. It doesn’t make sense that Bitcoin futures ETFs are allowed to trade but Bitcoin spot ETFs are not.
230 to be precise🤓. And that's even before we kicked off our campaign to encourage investors to submit comment letters on behalf of $GBTC conversion to a spot #Bitcoin#ETF. Excited to watch that number go up!
Solution: I don’t think they can be. If CME surveillance is sufficient to detect non CME fraud/manipulation for #bitcoin future ETFs, it should also be sufficient to detect non CME fraud/manipulation for spot #bitcoin ETFs.
I’ll continue to read through letters as they come in. Expecting a lot more after today. Humbled and encouraged by the outpouring of support we’re seeing. Investors, bitcoin proponents and US citizens want this! Let your voice be heard here: grayscale.com/comment/
10/ An ETF is unquestionably the best long-term way for $GBTC to track the value of its #bitcoin. This has always been the roadmap for GBTC (and $ETHE and our other #crypto investment funds). That’s why the full resources of the firm are behind this effort.
7/ Notably, one of @blackrock’s primary arguments on why the SEC should approve their #bitcoin ETF is the verbatim argument @Grayscale presented in our lawsuit to convert $GBTC to a spot #bitcoin ETF:
11/ We have the best legal minds representing $GBTC shareholders in the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, including Don Verrilli, former Solicitor General under the Obama administration, his team at MTO and Davis Polk.
I hear your point but that was also the first S-1 for a '33 Act crypto ETP ever. Also different SEC division than what reviewed the '40 Act BTC futures ETF N-1. The ETH-specific risk disclosures are also already out there. See our ETHE 10-K for instance.
This week, @DigitalChamber released a 🔥 report on the current state of #crypto ETFs.
It’s a must-read for any digital asset investor.
A brief 🧵 of some of the questions that it raises:
This is another new supporting argument in the context of #Bitcoin spot ETFs that wasn’t possible until the approval of the *first* #Bitcoin futures ETF registered under the *same regulation* that all #Bitcoin spot ETFs like $GBTC would be registered. So, what is the argument?
3/ Our lawsuit is about determinations on *questions of law*. Despite the SEC’s historical reluctance, or current perceptions of the #crypto industry more generally, this is a legal case about fair and equal treatment under the law.
We appreciate that the DC Circuit’s opinion acknowledged that this case presented a straight-forward question about equal treatment under the law.
More in the press release announcing Grayscale’s court win re our GBTC spot #bitcoin ETF application here:
globenewswire.com/news-relea…
2/ First, the SEC is already in a position to approve all spot #bitcoin ETFs. That's because the CME bitcoin futures market already has surveillance sharing through the Intermarket Surveillance Group - a global network of exchanges that share trading information.
Today Grayscale submitted our fourth comment letter regarding our pending 19b-4 proposal to convert GBTC to a spot #bitcoin ETF. Read more about the letter here: grayscale2021s.wpengine.com/…
Today, our legal team and counsel at Davis Polk & Wardwell and Munger Tolles & Olsen delivered a letter to the SEC with important information to consider as it decides on next steps for $GBTC. (1/3)