De Beers forced into rare 10-15% price cut as falling Chinese demand and rising supply of lab-made gems sink wholesale diamond prices by 40% in past 2 years
Theory: Elon would prob need to sell 1/3 of his $TSLA shares to finance a $TWTR buyout.
He needs an excuse to sell that much stock without cratering it. Twitter is that excuse.
Am I wrong?
Ok, have a friendly bet w wifey.
Of the following, if you had to stop using the products/services of two of these companies completely, which would you get rid of?
$FB, $AMZN, $MSFT, $GOOG, $AAPL
From 1937 to 1950 the S&P 500 did next to nothing. Then, over the next 20 years, it went up more than 6x.
From 1970 to 1982 the S&P did next to nothing. Then, over the next 18 years it went up 13x.
From 2000 to 2013, the S&P did next to nothing...
A business that has to reinvest almost all of its FCF to grow 5% is NOT the same as a business that has to reinvest almost none of its FCF to grow 5%.
That is all.
The worst of fintwit are the “I told you so” grave dancers who don’t share their own ideas and find pleasure in other ppl’s pain.
They always seem to multiply when the market is down, and push away those who add the most value here.
Hopefully Elon finds a way to get rid of em.
If you are a fundamental investor, don't buy a stock where you can't form a view on a normal earnings release or 8-k on your own.
If you need to look at the stock price or hear other people's opinions on a bit of news to know if its good or bad, you are the patsy at the table...
Hi Piers, I pray that nobody ever tries to murder you or your loved ones.
But if they do try, then you’ll understand that intent is sufficient to warrant a strong response.
I guarantee you won’t make public statements suggesting that the criminals should be let off the hook.
Jefferies:
HF long/short spread is -10% over two days. That's the 2nd worst two day move ever. Stating the obvious, but max pain/chase. 3+ standard dev moves all over the place...pain/chase levels are 10 out of 10
GS on $AMZN: as an interesting framework for its after-hours valuation, its EV (when applied to our 2023 AWS rev and OI forecasts) would be a 13x AWS revenue on 25% ’23 YoY growth and ~43x AWS GAAP OI on 20% ’23 YoY growth – this would value the non-AWS Amazon businesses at zero.
Sure, but banks don’t invest client deposits in ponzi schemes. They issue loans w recourse to real, cash flowing assets that provide society w some form of utility.
SBC is a financing decision and if gaap simply moved the associated add back from CFO to the financing section of the cash flow statement 75% of FCF debates would be squashed.
As promised, here is my $KKR model. It is one of my fav positions over the next 3-5 years. Open to questions or feedback on any assumptions.
Disclosure: I am long and often wrong, do your own due diligence.
drive.google.com/file/d/1KA7…
$QQQ lost 1/3 of its value in just 14 trading days in 2000. From there, it proceeded to lose 75% more over the next ~2 yrs.
In a 6-wk period, Druck, one of the best HF managers of all time lost $3bn.
If you think you'll know when to get out of bubble names, just remember this:
“Our slowing revenue growth means we are also having to slow our cost growth as a company,” Netflix said in an emailed statement. “So sadly, we are letting around 150 employees go today, mostly US-based.”
$NFLX
“We calculate about 40% of the US equity market can only survive with new buyers entering the market bc they’re not cash flow generating…near a historic high and right in line with 1999/2000.”
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
If I told you in Feb 2020 that over the next 3 years, $ZM revenues would increase 8-fold and net income would grow from $0 to >$1bn, with the starting valuation of $20bn...
...what portion of your net worth would you have bet that the stock would be up?
It’s easy to sometimes forget that supply vs demand is the only thing that matters for price of a given asset. Fundamentals only matter to a co’s stock price to the extent they’re the main driver of supply v demand for shares. Important to recognize when other factors take over.
Investors would be better off if they ignored pretty much every single addback except maybe amortization of acquired intangibles.
Adjusted EPS is basically a scam. So is adjusted FCF.
Charlie munger tells us we should constantly be adding new mental models to our toolbox. One of my fav sleeper models is looking for companies that can grow revs rapidly without a corresponding increase in share count. Revenue per share, if you will.
What are some of yours?
Hamas Official Ghazi Hamad: We Will Repeat the October 7 Attack Time and Again Until Israel Is Annihilated; We Are Victims - Everything We Do Is Justified #Hamas#Gaza#Palestinians
"With apologies to Mr. Buffett, $HHH would become a modern-day Berkshire Hathaway that would acquire controlling interests in operating companies*"
*apologies to Mr. Buffett bc he never had the wits (or audacity) to charge investors a 1.5% mgmt fee on $BRK mkt cap
@thepupil11
JPM taking an ax to software names today d/g $COUP$SMAR$PAYC$CDAY$TWLO to u/w
Investors are underestimating:
1) severity of bookings impact
2) potential duration of bookings impact
3) impact of payment deferrals
4) severity & impact of unemployment claims spike
Just because someone loud or smart-sounding is pounding the table on a stock, it doesn’t mean they know what they are talking about or that they are right. Trust but verify. Do your own work.
Its sad that so many ppl find it so hard to condemn the recent barbaric actions of a designated terrorist org that chants death to America.
Ofc there is nuance to Israel/Palestinian conflict, but there is zero nuance re hamas.
Hamas doesn’t care about civilians, incl it’s own.
When I was a young analyst, I used to love catching up w someone who just got out of a 1x1 w mgmt or just spoke w a very knowledgeable industry expert.
Then I realized two people can be in the same exact meeting and walk away with wildly varying views on what mgmt said.
DYODD.
Many companies have pushed pricing way too far too fast. Margins may have expanded in the short term, but demand destruction and/or margin normalization is coming - especially in higher ticket discretionary areas of spend.
Caveat emptor.
“In order to fund our purchase of Netflix, beginning on Friday and over the last few days, we unwound the substantial majority of our interest rate hedge generating proceeds of $1.25 billion.”
🐐
We recently purchased more than 3.1m shares of @Netflix which makes us a top-20 holder. I have long admired Reed Hastings and the remarkable company he and his team have built. We are delighted that the market has presented us with this opportunity. assets.pershingsquareholding…
If you need 10 pages to explain an investment, you should assume it will stay mispriced until it can be explained in 1-2 pages.
Doesn't mean it cant go up as intrinsic value compounds, but multiple expansion will be harder to come by.
Maturing as an investor is ignoring the urge to average down and dispassionately evaluating the new setup at current prices regardless of what your cost basis is
I've seen some confusion on why higher inventory balances (BS item) would lead to potentially overstated margins for manufacturers (IS item).
Most manufacturers use something called absorption costing, which entails allocating ALL costs associated with mfg a product to COGS.
Roark puts $200m into $CAKE in return for
-1% commitment fee
-9.5% div (cash or pik)
-participation in common dividends on as converted basis
-convertible to common stock at $22.23, 18.75% above last close but 56% below 52 wk high
Not a bad way to put money to work...
Not usually a Cathie basher, but she thinks her holdings are priced to deliver 40% IRRs over the next five years even after taking into account “massive multiple compression”
$IWG is the most mispriced business I own. If it was listed in the US, I think stock would be 2x current levels.
13x run-rate FCF isn't the lowest valuation by any means - but the cos managed partnership model has found product market fit and is starting to meaningfully inflect.
Low probability existential threats don’t have to actually materialize for them to impair your capital.
The expected probability just has to rise to a level that makes you uncomfortable enough to a point at which you choose to sell for a loss.
A crazy thing about markets is that even execs + board members who have near perfect information about their company many times have zero clue what expectations are baked into their share price or how their stock will react to new info being revealed broadly to investors.
Something I struggle with is when a biz that grows its per share value rapidly, and that I want to own for 5+ yrs, appreciates a lot rapidly such that my fwd IRR est comes down and it makes it hard for me to #neversell. How do you all handle this (admittedly high class) problem?
Anybody who tells you they know how much lower we are going is full of it.
Just know what you own and make sure you know it well enough to hold thru volatility.
And make sure you own it at a price that’ll be likely to generate respectable IRRs over your investment period.
Time to rehash the $KKR long thesis:
1)Unlike other alt managers, KKR leans into its business by using its balance sheet.
2)Using the BS to seed new strategies has helped KKR grow and diversify its AUM – from $23bn of AUM in 2005 to >$200bn currently.
Index funds cant buy more than the weight.
Most active mngrs who are willing to own them are already max weight.
Other active mngrs are unwilling to own them bc of optics.
Employees are structural sellers, while the cos have been hoarding cash instead of buying out employees.