Ayez le courage de visionner

Bill Clinton: “I killed myself trying to give the Palestinians a state. I had a deal they turned down that would have given them all of Gaza and 97% of the West Bank. You name it. They turned it down.” The Palestinians never wanted peace. This must be shared every single day.

L'@afpfr a publié aujourd'hui une dépêche comportant une traduction erronée des propos du ministre de la Défense israélien @Israel_katz. Cette erreur de traduction a été largement reprise par les médias francophones à travers le monde, conduisant à une interprétation fallacieuse de ses propos. Je remercie les équipes de l'@afpfr d’avoir réagi rapidement suite à mon signalement et d'avoir rectifié cette erreur. @Malbrunot @Le_Figaro @JeroFeno @lemondefr @franceinfo @LOrientLeJour @RFI @FRANCE24 @RTBF @laprovence @TimesofIsrael @humanite_fr @lesoir @YahooActuFR @Mediapart @LeTemps @OrenMarmorstein

Rencontre chaleureuse aujourd’hui avec le Ministre de l’Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l’Espace @PhBaptiste. Un moment de solidarité face à la montée de l'antisémitisme au sein des universités françaises mais également de coopération en réaffirmant l'importance des liens entre nos pays dans les domaines de l'Espace, de la science et de l'innovation. Monsieur le Ministre, merci pour votre accueil.

Yesterday, the Terrorist Financing Targeting Center - the U.S. together with Gulf partners including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman and Qatar - jointly designated key parts of Hezbollah’s financial infrastructure: Al-Qard Al-Hassan, Bayt al-Mal, affiliated entities and senior officials. The targets were already under U.S. sanctions, so the importance is not that Washington discovered something new. The importance is political: Gulf states are now publicly aligning against Hezbollah’s financial system - including the very institutions that allow Hezbollah to function as a state within the Lebanese state. That creates a direct question for Europe. The EU still maintains the artificial distinction between Hezbollah’s “military” and “political” wings. But AQAH and Bayt al-Mal are not “military wing” structures. They are core Hezbollah financial institutions. If Gulf states and the U.S. can jointly target them, why is Europe still hiding behind a distinction that Hezbollah itself does not observe? Europe should immediately mirror the designations - and finally list Hezbollah in its entirety. home.treasury.gov/news/press… @kajakallas @Elysee @francediplo @bundeskanzler

Avancée israélienne 🇮🇱 : Des chercheurs de @TelAvivUni et du centre médical Sheba ont mis au point un système d’intelligence artificielle capable de détecter l’anémie grâce à un scan de 10 secondes des vaisseaux sanguins de l’œil, sans recourir à une prise de sang. L’intelligence artificielle estime la quantité d’hémoglobine et le nombre de globules rouges du patient en analysant le flux des cellules dans la circulation sur les clichés de ses vaisseaux. Une nouvelle technologie israélienne qui pourrait rendre les dépistages médicaux plus rapides, plus simples et plus accessibles partout dans le monde. 👁️

Contrairement à ce qui est affirmé ici, Israël a agi contre des terroristes armés. Ce sont des militants syriens qui ont violé l’Accord de séparation des forces entre Israël et la Syrie de 1974 en pénétrant dans la zone tampon en décembre 2024. Quant à la Turquie, qui donne des leçons aux autres sur le respect de l’intégrité territoriale de la Syrie, c’est précisément ce pays qui, depuis des années, viole ouvertement la souveraineté syrienne en maintenant des forces militaires turques dans le nord de la Syrie.

@Cdenquete Il est temps de refaire votre enquête. Les terroristes utilisent le journalisme comme un bouclier, tout comme ils se servent de tant d'autres infrastructures civiles. L'argument selon lequel tout individu portant un gilet pare-balles “Presse” serait nécessairement journaliste ne résiste pas à l'épreuve du temps, comme le démontre cette réanalyse.

Pendant deux ans et demi, j'ai vu se construire un récit qu'il était presque interdit de questionner : "Israël tue les journalistes." Aujourd'hui, le CPJ retire huit noms de sa liste - c'étaient des combattants du Hamas ou du Jihad islamique, pas des reporters. Et ce n'est probablement que la partie visible : certains travaux OSINT évoquent plus d'une centaine de cas suspects. Dans mon entretien pour @atlantico_fr , j'explique pourquoi ce n'est pas une simple erreur de base de données, mais l'effondrement d'un système entier. Un système où la "double source indépendante" n'a souvent été qu'une fiction, où poser des questions de méthode suffisait à se voir accusé de salir la liberté de la presse. Le cas le plus glaçant que j'évoque : un caméraman d'Al Jazeera présenté comme victime civile, célébré ailleurs comme "moudjahid" par une mosquée de Gaza. Ma question : combien de médias, d'ONG et de responsables politiques qui ont relayé ces chiffres sans prudence accepteront de le reconnaître - avec la même force qu'ils ont mis à accuser ? » atlantico.fr/article/decrypt…

Researchers from Tel Aviv University and Sheba Medical Center have developed an AI system that detects anemia using a 10-second scan of blood vessels in the eye, without a blood test. The technology could make health screening faster, simpler and more accessible worldwide. 👁️🇮🇱

📸 Happy International Camera Day! A single photograph can preserve a moment, tell a story, or offer a new perspective. This photo was taken somewhere in Israel. 🇮🇱 Drop your guess below 👇

Si Georges Malbrunot, Ahmad Husseini et les journalistes du Hezbollah trouvent l’accord-cadre signé entre le Liban et Israël aussi mauvais, c’est qu’il est probablement très bon.

L'UNRWA DÉMASQUÉE. Ce documentaire percutant révèle la vérité que la communauté internationale a trop longtemps ignorée : le parti pris politique profond de l'@UNRWA, son enseignement systématique de la haine et son implication directe dans le terrorisme. Finies les excuses. Finis les dénis. Regardez « Unraveling UNRWA » sur @TheNewsForum_ (Canada).

You can almost hear her thoughts - you Jew, you deserved the kidnapping, rape, and torture. THIS is the true face of the United Nations.

Le ministre des Affaires étrangères @gidonsaar : « Il n’est jamais trop tard pour faire ce qui est juste. Je remercie @IsraeliPM Netanyahu pour son soutien, ainsi que les ministres du gouvernement pour avoir approuvé à l’unanimité la résolution que j’ai présentée en vue de la reconnaissance par Israël du génocide arménien. Israël rejoint ainsi les 32 pays qui ont rempli leur devoir moral en reconnaissant la vérité historique et en rejetant les tentatives visant à la nier. »

Mais alors, apartheid ou pas? Je m'y perds, je m'y perds...

The U.S. is proud to be a part of today's historic trilateral framework agreement between Israel and Lebanon. There is more work to be done, but we're taking meaningful steps toward a future of peace, prosperity, and mutual coexistence.

🔴 Mélenchon déclare douter que les actes du 7 octobre étaient bien des actes terroristes. 💬​ « Il est assez stupide de croire qu’il y aurait parmi nous des gens qui se réjouiraient du terrorisme... À SUPPOSER QUE LES ACTES DONT ON PARLE SOIENT BIEN DU TERRORISME ! Car la question de LA FORME DE LA RÉSISTANCE QUE L'ON OPPOSE À UNE OPPRESSION EST UNE AFFAIRE QUI SE DISCUTE ! Nous avons toujours refusé de suivre les caractérisations qui nous étaient suggérées lorsque nous étions interrogés Par respect pour cette possibilité que le droit ouvre, Ce qui n'a jamais voulu dire que nous approuvions telle ou telle méthode de combat... » 👉🏻 ​Jean-Luc Mélenchon était en déplacement devant le tribunal pour défendre Anasse Kazib, poursuivi pour apologie du terrorisme, après avoir salué les attaques du Hamas du 7 octobre. 📹 Mizane TV

“They are killing enormous numbers of civilians…they are targeting one, two, three enemy combatants and in the process killing huge numbers of civilians. @piersmorgan Piers a few minutes later – “If you can’t say exactly how many civilians have been killed in Gaza, what you say about numbers is bull.” Dear @piersmorgan I tried to explain to you where numbers in the Gaza war (or any war) are going to come from "simply.” But let me type it out so you have a record of it instead of the interruptions and the tactic of just asking the same question over and over while I explain how the numbers work. The same numbers by the way that you used minutes before to criticize Israel and constantly repeat or have guests on that repeat, or more often state not even Hamas numbers but false numbers about xx civilians, xx women, xx children, xx percentages that go beyond Hamas's actual list of casualties. First, let me correct you again (like I did to start the segment) by providing you my actual quotes: 1 - "Israel and the IDF have implemented more measures (sometimes quoted as precautions) to prevent civilian harm in urban warfare than any military in history," That is testable against urban warfare history of any similar situation (mostly attack of defended urban terrain). Israel civilian harm mitigation measure have included advance notification (flyers, phone calls, text messages, voicemails, drones with speakers, tv, radio, social media), safe corridors to include improving roads used for safe corridors in the middle of the war, roof knocking (notifying all residents of a building in advance for evacuations and then using non-penetrating low-yield munitions on top of the building before then waiting to strike), over daily multi-hour pauses in fighting (over 400 days of the 800 days of fighting) to allow civilian evacuations and aid movement, establishing a one-star commanded civilian harm mitigation cell that created a real time civilian presence (using cell phone presence, drones, satellite images, etc.) software reflected on all combat operating systems, handing out their own military maps to the entire population (to include the enemy) and then communicating the location of IDF operations, areas to avoid or further evacuate, using major call outs of buildings and neighborhoods, restrictive rules of engagement based on likely civilian presence, rigorous fires processes and legal reviews that often ended in calling mission off out of civilian harm estimates. Many of these measures have never been attempted, by any military. 2 - "Israel has a lower civilian to combatant ratio than any similar context (war or battle) in the history of urban warfare.” After acknowledging the lack of comparative cases (size of enemy forces (which I asked you about, you don't know), tunnels, density, strategy, tactics, prevention of civilian evacuations) but still doing the simple analysis, in order to provide the evidence for this statement I use the same numbers you and your frequent guests push to condemn Israel. But here: Q: How do you estimate the number of civilians deaths? A: Take the number the Hamas Gaza Health Ministry reports (despite that it includes any death in Gaza for any reason or cause (Israel/Hamas/Other terrorists) and has been well documented with inaccuracies (even having to be updated by Hamas of natural deaths, incomplete entries, false entries) and subtract the Israel stated combatant deaths. The Hamas Gaza Health Ministry claims roughly 72,000 deaths in Gaza. The IDF says it has killed about 25,000-26,000 combatants, a number also reported by President Trump in October 2025. If you subtract 25,000 from 72,000, even using Hamas’s number at face value, you get roughly 47,000 non-combatant deaths, or a bit less than a 2:1 ratio. If you were modest to adjust for natural deaths and Hamas-caused deaths, is likely closer to 35,000–40,000 non-combatant deaths versus 25,000 combatants killed, which puts the ratio closer to 1.5:1. If you compare 2:1 or 1.5:1 to any numbers we have (in many cases we don’t have) for wars, urban centric wars, contested urban battles they will be some of the lowest ratios (in some cases lowest by far) ever seen despite none of those wars or battles had the context of Gaza. For example: World War II – 70 million civilians, 20 million combatants, 3.5:1 Korean War – 2.5 million civilians, 90,000 combatants, 27:1 Iraq War – 280-300,000 civilians, 150-200,000 combatants, 1.4:1 to 2:1 But wait, the Gaza numbers are usually aggregated numbers for the entire war, any death ever reported in Gaza. But if you disaggregate the numbers to specific battles like Rafah, Khan Yunis, Gaza City 2025 for comparison you get different numbers. Based on modest numbers from the Battle of Rafah, the civilian to combatant ratio would be more like 1:100 due to multiple operational variables like the success of civilian evacuations. Major urban battles (modest comparison of battles with any like variables). Mosul – 10,000 civilians. Combatant unknown but total estimate in battle 5,000 – 2:1 Manila – 100,000 civilians. Combatants 17,000 – 6:1 Seoul – Unknown/no record of civilian but very likely high ratio based on histories Mariupol – Unknown/mass graves, estimate 20-22,000 civilians, 3-8,000 combatants - 2.5:1 to 7.3:1 I actually use this discussion about numbers or quote about ratio sparingly despite how many times it has been attribute to me because I know the complexity of casualty counting especially in urban centric wars with combatants that violate the law of war and do not distinguish themselves (uniforms/marking) making determining a body found (if there is a body) or a name reported (such as methods in Gaza) and then classifying that person as was participating in the hostilities (combatant) or not (noncombatant) is beyond just difficult and should always be viewed as questionable. In Mosul, a year after the battle there was not only no agreed upon casualty number, but the Mayor of the city also said there were 40,000 civilian deaths. These numbers are always messy, political, susceptible to manipulation by the different organizations involved. My point has always been that numbers of casualty reporting in Gaza doesn’t paint the story people routinely push. Actually, the opposite. Urban warfare is inherently and historically costly against civilians and the infrastructure. All wars involve noncombatant death. The moral, legal requirement is to do proportionality assessments and take feasible steps to prevent excessive civilian harm. So, using your logic Piers, if you can’t state how many combatants were killed (by Israel, Hamas, terrorist rockets, other terrorists in power struggles) … you can’t say (or allow your guests to say) Israel has killed a “large number of civilians” or “killed a disproportionate number of civilians” like you did in this very interveiw. You can't spend years saying Israel is killing enormous numbers of civilians and then tell me nobody can estimate civilian deaths so ratios aren't valid. Those two positions can't both be true. If casualty estimates are reliable enough to accuse Israel, then they're also reliable enough to examine civilian-to-combatant ratios. If they aren't, then they shouldn't be used selectively only when they support one conclusion.

Je soumettrai au gouvernement, pour approbation lors de sa prochaine réunion, un projet de résolution visant la reconnaissance officielle du génocide arménien par le gouvernement israélien. Il s'agit d'une obligation morale et historique de reconnaître le génocide perpétré contre le peuple arménien à la fin de l'Empire ottoman. Parallèlement, il convient de condamner toute négation, minimisation ou déformation de la vérité historique. La résolution sera ensuite soumise au vote de la Knesset.