The financial control layer for companies operating across stablecoins, crypto and fiat rails.

onchain
Pinned Tweet
We are excited to announce our $8.3M Series A to build the financial control layer for companies operating across stablecoin, crypto and fiat rails. Stablecoins settle in seconds. Yet too many treasury, risk, and compliance controls still run on business-day logic. Range closes that gap: a single real-time platform unifying your wallets, custodians, bank accounts, and exchanges, with risk and compliance controls that screen transactions before money moves and full visibility across rails. This round brings our total funding to $11M. Investors in the round include TX Ventures, @Maven11Capital, @SixThirty_630ft, @StellarOrg, Onigiri Capital, and others. Range is already running at scale: - $30B+ in assets under management protected - 99.41% of all stablecoin payments tracked across 200+ networks - 10,000+ integrations across banks, custodians, and wallets See what total financial control looks like across stablecoins, crypto and fiat 👇 range.org/?utm_source=twitte…
24
33
136
1,051,608
"We support stablecoins" usually means a balance on a dashboard. That is not support, it is exposure waiting for the payment you needed to stop. Holding the asset is trivial. The hard part is everything the dollar lands in: the approvals, screening and reconciliation. Your financial operation is built for a world where money took two days to move and could be recalled. A control that runs overnight cannot stop a payment that settles in seconds. The asset is the commodity, and the competitive advantage comes from the operating model around it. Read the full piece to run the one test that shows whether your stack could have stopped a bad payment before it settles 👇 range.org/blog/most-companie…
1
19
138
2,134
Stablecoins did not add risk to your treasury. They exposed where your controls already lagged: built for settlement in days, now running behind settlement in seconds. Range puts both crypto and fiat rails on one ledger, with controls before the money moves. Find the gaps in your stack 👇 range.org/blog/what-stableco…
4
10
162
2,228
OFAC added 134 addresses to its sanctions list today, many tied to ISIS/ISIL financing. They're already live in Range's Transaction Screening. Every deposit and withdrawal our customers run is screened against the update, before the money moves. Sanctions screening that keeps pace with @USTreasury 👇 range.org/pricing#transactio…
1
16
107
4,268
Stablecoin payment rails: the corridors, buyers and use cases that convert nitter.app/i/broadcasts/1wGWjjOeB…
2
16
136
2,581
Live today at 3pm UTC. Daniel Cartolin, Head of Sales at @sphere_labs, joins @Paulapbpb to break down what institutional and fintech buyers actually want from stablecoin payment rails in 2026. Set a reminder to join us 👇 piped.video/watch?v=zqqrv00k…
Stablecoin payment rails are moving from crypto-native to mainstream cross-border business. Our next Range Fireside goes inside the buyer conversation with Daniel Cartolin, Head of Sales at @sphere_labs. 🧵👇 Daniel spent five years building the Latin America business at Chainalysis before joining @sphere. He now onboards fintechs, platforms and institutions to stablecoin payment infrastructure and sees firsthand which use cases convert and which stall. Hosted by Paula Pettit (@Paulapbpb), VP of Strategy & Growth at Range, we will get into the deals that close: cross-border payouts, collections, on/off-ramp and treasury, the corridors that fit stablecoin settlement, and how buyers weigh speed, cost and compliance in 2026. 📅 Wednesday, July 1 @ 3pm UTC Set a reminder on YouTube 👇 piped.video/watch?v=zqqrv00k…
3
15
118
3,604
Range retweeted
Short-term incentives will always run out. So what actually keeps liquidity? @Ben_Haslam_S in conversation with @range_org.
1
2
5
1,019
You can't bolt stablecoin support onto software built for bank accounts and expect it to work. Assets move differently, settlement works differently, and controls have to behave differently. Range was built for this. Range CEO @aesmonty in conversation with @Paulapbpb 👇
1
3
74
3,081
A neobank can try to recall a wire. It cannot claw back a stablecoin. Settlement is final in seconds, so the only control that survives is one that fires before the transfer leaves. On a customer rail, compliance, counterparty risk and treasury control collapse into that one decision. What needs to be in place before the first transfer 👇 range.org/blog/why-irreversi…
5
2
70
3,561
The compliance industry was built around a slower financial system. That model does not work when money settles in seconds, 24/7. In conversation with @Paulapbpb, @aesmonty explain why controls have to run before settlement, not after 👇
11
37
2,734
Stablecoins settle in seconds. But the controls around them were designed for a world where money took two days to move. That gap is measurable. A payment goes out at 2am on Sunday. It settles in seconds. The approval flow assumed a business day, a batch window, and a human at a desk. By Monday, there is nothing to recall. That is not a stablecoin problem. It is an operating-model problem. The risk that bites is the distance between when the money moved and when your controls caught up: approval, screening, reconciliation and audit evidence all running behind settlement. Range is built to close that gap: one ledger across stablecoins and fiat rails, with controls before settlement and records your team does not have to reconstruct after the fact. Read the full piece to find the control gaps your current stack may be missing 👇 range.org/blog/what-stableco…
2
7
46
3,194
Stablecoin payment rails are moving from crypto-native to mainstream cross-border business. Our next Range Fireside goes inside the buyer conversation with Daniel Cartolin, Head of Sales at @sphere_labs. 🧵👇 Daniel spent five years building the Latin America business at Chainalysis before joining @sphere. He now onboards fintechs, platforms and institutions to stablecoin payment infrastructure and sees firsthand which use cases convert and which stall. Hosted by Paula Pettit (@Paulapbpb), VP of Strategy & Growth at Range, we will get into the deals that close: cross-border payouts, collections, on/off-ramp and treasury, the corridors that fit stablecoin settlement, and how buyers weigh speed, cost and compliance in 2026. 📅 Wednesday, July 1 @ 3pm UTC Set a reminder on YouTube 👇 piped.video/watch?v=zqqrv00k…
2
20
61
6,284
A neobank can try to recall a wire. It cannot claw back a stablecoin. That single change breaks a risk model built on reversibility: screen up front, settle, reverse or remediate later if something is wrong. Stablecoin settlement is final in seconds, at any hour. The only control that survives is one that fires before the transfer leaves. For neobanks, the problem is sharper because the stablecoin rail becomes part of the customer product. The customer initiates the transfer. The recipient is whoever they choose to pay. Customer compliance, counterparty risk and treasury control become one decision. Range is built for that moment: one record across stablecoins and fiat, with controls that screen before settlement and evidence finance and compliance can both use. Read the full piece to see what needs to be in place before the first stablecoin transfer leaves 👇 range.org/blog/why-irreversi…
18
66
3,971
What can actually go wrong when you run a stablecoin treasury? In conversation with @Paulapbpb, Range CEO @aesmonty breaks down the 3 risks every crypto treasury has to monitor 👇
1
9
49
3,608
Your compliance stack can be right and still be too late. Stablecoins settle in seconds. Many compliance tools were built for a world where settlement took days and a human could still sit in the loop. MiCA and the GENIUS Act make that gap impossible to ignore. The fix is not rip-and-replace of your current finance stack. It is adding the treasury context your stack was never built to hold: matched counterparties across wallets, bank accounts and exchanges, with controls that run before settlement. That is what Range is built for. Read the full piece to find the enforcement gaps your current stack may be missing 👇 range.org/blog/what-mica-and…
2
23
58
2,943
Range comes down to two words: Unify and Protect. Unify: every custodian, wallet and payment rail in one platform, with visibility finance teams don't have today. Protect: standardized counterparties and controls, screening every transaction before it settles. @aesmonty explains 👇
4
12
79
239,295
The biggest fintechs are adopting stablecoins. The biggest crypto companies are building for regulated institutions. Our Series A cap table reflects this convergence, listing fintech and crypto investors side by side. Range CEO @aesmonty with @Paulapbpb 👇
5
11
59
225,271
Range retweeted
Congrats to @aesmonty and the @range_org team on the raise! As investors with Kahuna, we’re proud to back the team building the clear leader at the intersection of stablecoins and fiat finance. Real-time control across rails is the future, excited to see what you scale this. Onwards!
We are excited to announce our $8.3M Series A to build the financial control layer for companies operating across stablecoin, crypto and fiat rails. Stablecoins settle in seconds. Yet too many treasury, risk, and compliance controls still run on business-day logic. Range closes that gap: a single real-time platform unifying your wallets, custodians, bank accounts, and exchanges, with risk and compliance controls that screen transactions before money moves and full visibility across rails. This round brings our total funding to $11M. Investors in the round include TX Ventures, @Maven11Capital, @SixThirty_630ft, @StellarOrg, Onigiri Capital, and others. Range is already running at scale: - $30B+ in assets under management protected - 99.41% of all stablecoin payments tracked across 200+ networks - 10,000+ integrations across banks, custodians, and wallets See what total financial control looks like across stablecoins, crypto and fiat 👇 range.org/?utm_source=twitte…
1
3
12
1,029