fastest image and video generation in the world
- Tweets 289
- Following 75
- Followers 2,690
- Likes 269
Pinned Tweet
In case you missed it, we teamed up with @tenstorrent and delivered realtime video. Video generated faster than it takes to play it!
If you want to test it, sign up at the link the comments.
7
14
58
342,496
FLUX.2 [max] vs Recraft V4 Pro
22.6s at $0.07/img vs 29.4s at $0.25/img. 3.5x price gap.
At 10K images/month: $700 vs $2,500. Same premium tier, very different economics.
173
FLUX.2 [flex] vs Nano Banana 2
12.7s at $60/1K vs 24.5s at $80/1K. Open source running 2x faster, 25% cheaper.
The quality speaks for itself.
2
181
Product shot: Recraft V4 vs Seedream 5 Lite.
Material rendering, lighting, composition. Both handle it, but reflections and textures differ noticeably.
At e-commerce scale, these nuances show up in conversions.
2
176
4 video models, 1 prompt.
Wan 2.2, P-Video, Seedance Lite, Seedance Pro Turbo. All different results.
Motion, consistency, speed, cost. Each has a sweet spot. Run them side by side to find yours.
2
2
270
Wan 2.2 Lightning generating video.
Open source video gen caught up faster than expected. Solid motion quality at a fraction of closed-source pricing.
2
175
Recraft V4 on text rendering. ~12s, $40/1K.
If your product needs readable text in generated images (menus, signs, packaging), this is where Recraft shines.
2
183
FLUX.2 [max] vs Recraft V4 Pro, final round.
Across 5 prompts, same pattern. $0.07/image premium output. Costs drop enough and teams find new applications they couldn't justify before.
4
184
FLUX.2 [flex] vs Nano Banana 2, final round.
Across all five prompts: flex stays ahead on speed and cost. Optimized open source inference is pulling ahead.
1
4
164
Recraft V4 vs Seedream 5 Lite on a portrait.
~12s/$40 per 1K vs ~19s/$35 per 1K. Different approaches, different results. For user-facing portraits, these differences matter.
3
118
Prodia retweeted
@prodialabs - the fastest image and video generation API, one call to the best models
1
2
5
135
Veo 3 Fast in action.
Strong motion coherence from Google's video model. Closed-source pricing, but the quality shows what large training budgets produce.
3
161
FLUX.1 [schnell] vs. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
300ms vs 100ms. Same prompt. Klein 4B is a generational leap in lightweight models.
When your product needs real-time gen, this speed gap tells the story.
1
112
Recraft V4 vs. FLUX.2 [flex] on text rendering.
Text in images is one of the hardest things to get right. Different architectures, similar speeds, different results.
The right model depends on the use case.
2
89
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B. Product photography in under a second. $6/1K.
Newer architectures aren't just faster for benchmarks. Cheaper per gen means high-volume image gen economics actually work.
2
118
Monet garden across 4 models.
Artistic styles test aesthetic interpretation, not just photorealism. Each model brings different character. There's a trade-off to be had here in aesthetic flavour vs speed vs price, and that comes down to you and your use case.
2
148
Food photography: Recraft V4 vs Seedream 5 Lite.
Moisture, gloss, plating. Subtle lighting differences have outsized impact on food prompts. Which aesthetic fits your product?
5
180
Prodia retweeted
ICYMI we showcased our 10x faster than real-time video generation demos at TT-Deploy ft. Tenstorrent Galaxy Blackhole in collaboration with @prodialabs .
- 10x faster real-time high-quality video gen
- infinite movie w/ real-time prompting
3
10
74
5,832