I was invited to testify as a witness at the House of Commons committee studying a new bill that would dramatically expand the application of the criminal law to speech. We've asked Parliament to withdraw the bill, or make necessary amendments.
Our constitutional tradition is clear: freedom of expression protects even offensive and disturbing speech, and even hateful views, unless they cross a very high threshold.
Criminal law is our most powerful state tool, and it carries the highest stigma and the most serious consequences for liberty. It must be used with great restraint, especially in matters touching expression, belief, and political and religious discourse.
Hate cannot be legislated out of the human heart. What the criminal law can do — and should do — is prevent violence, threats, harassment and intimidation. But when we criminalize opinions, we risk making martyrs of hatemongers and driving vulnerable people toward hidden spaces of radicalization rather than exposing harmful ideas to the disinfecting force of truth and public criticism.
You can watch my full remarks to committee here: