My friend opened a cabinet which contained an infinite supply of food inside and said that this is the "public goods cabinet" where everyone in the world can share in unlimited food. Obviously a terrible mistake. I immediately corrected him; since the cabinet can only fit so many eager hands, it is clearly excludable and therefore a club good. To prevent this I called a meeting of the Ethereum core developers.
After several hours of arguing about whether the congestion algorithm was ZK-friendly, we eventually settled on a multidimensional EIP1559 curve which would independently manage the demand for the different food groups, as well as a sidecar entrance for more lightweight access to any food which might expire after 18 days.
We considered using the congestion fees to end world hunger, or pocketing them for ourselves, but ultimately determined that none of these solutions would be credibly neutral. Instead, we will use the proceeds to purchase more food, and place it back inside the infinite cabinet, thus increasing overall value for the existing food holders.
My friend opened a cabinet and said that this is the “public goods cabinet” where everyone in the house shares their food.
Obviously a terrible mistake. I immediately corrected him, saying that this is a commons and not a public good, as the food is excludable and rivalrous. I then shared Ostroms principles for how to govern the commons and flagged that some were not applied here which might put the commons at risk. To prevent this I called a meeting of the roommates in his house. After 30min of hot yoga and introduction sessions, we embarked on a 4 hour workshop to create a plan for governing the commons.
Now the cabinet is perfectly designed as a commons following Ostroms principles, governance over the commons are done via a quadratic time weighted Hypercert-powered voting scheme and a security council with a 3/5 multisig. 1 step closer to ethers Phoenix