One of the major reasons why I don't use Bookmap or some other level 3 tools is because the whole idea of looking at large offers or bids from and black-and-white perspective of resistance/support is completely misleading when component of "magnet" is dismissed.
Beginners in
#trading education are taught: If you see a large offer think of resistance.
If you see large bid think of support.
Thats oversimplification due to magnet effect not being accounted for.
And that resistance/support in itself is one of the main selling points of many fancy order flow tools like Bookmap, footprints, deltas, and whatnot. "You'll see big orders in advance clearer and see where sellers will block the price" is what you are told on much of educational content.
Let's break down this concept in two ways:
-Large offers on the ladder can represent resistance.
-Large offers on the ladder can represent magnet (a great opportunity for large participants to buy more and increase inventory size). Because that might be their best chance to fill bigger positions if at no other price levels, large offers were participating. So that large offer....becomes a magnet. Not a resistance, but something that large participant wants to squeeze the price into to fill more longs. Which totally negates the "resistance" viewpoint and flips it upside down.
If you have no idea on what the agenda of particular ticker might be, or whats possible on today's ticker, then large bids or offers around near current price levels will barely provide any insight. They will provide much more likely distraction and noise. At least on average, obviously exceptions apply always from time to time.
Large institutions or rigging market makers sometimes deal with dry instruments. And they wait like hawks until someone shows up with large offers or bids, in which case they might feel the need to "drive the price" to that level where that big offer or bid is sitting just to "eat it up".
This makes the entire prospect of a large offer on the ladder in such cases not resistance component (the price should shy away from trading into it) and becoming a magnet instead (the price should be lured trading into it and then beyond).
Once you understand above, you'll see that anyone who sells you an oversimplified view on orderflow tools and the visual magic they provide, is often explained through too easy to be true (that sells well) perspective. Because if they did hit you with whole truth, you would end up being more confused using the tool than not using one once you apply the component of magnetting.
Thinking about large participants is about inventory repositioning, 100s of 1000s of shares for whoever controls the float/order flow on the ticker. You will often see that those huge order areas that were "not supposed to be broken" are swiped clean and the price doesnt even look back after doing it.
Ask yourself, if i dont know what agenda of market maker/institution is, but i was trained to look at every large offer on my fancy order flow tool (or level 2 for that matter) as resistance, yet it could equally be a liquidity magnet for large participants....then how do i know which one will be in play. This means...that knowing agenda will be a critical component and far more difficult task than to just have an eye out for those large orders. Because their agenda dictates how they see large liquidity stacks.
You have probably heard the phrase "market constantly seeks liquidity". The prospect of "magnetting" applies to same principle and opens big gapping hole into concept of large offer-resistance.
#smallcaps #stocks #forex