A lifelong fan of superhero comics and films, with a love of in-depth analysis! You can now check out my writing at ComicBook.com.

North West, England
As a Christian, one of the things I find hardest about this new incarnation of Twitter is that it seems to bring out the worst in us as Christians. A big reason for this is tied to the concept of "freedom of speech." ๐Ÿงต
13
10
105
23,335
As a Brit, I've been watching the American election results with sorrow for my American friends. Some are comparing it to the Brexit vote here, imagining if we'd voted for Brexit twice. But here's the thing... in a sense, we did. And here are some lessons from it. ๐Ÿงต
799
3,450
25,721
3,685,010
For days, I've wondered why the PM was so slow to call in the army to deal with these riots. Today, I've come to understand why; he knows what the far right is attempting to do. ๐Ÿงต
744
2,610
19,263
3,846,509
Elon Musk is a fascinatingly odd character. He's set himself on a collision course with the U.K. government, I think because he genuinely believes he's bigger than a country's democratically elected government. ๐Ÿงต
6,064
1,580
17,937
2,322,430
No, @OliverDowden, there's nothing undemocratic about political parties cooperating. Remember 2010, when Cameron entered into a coalition govt? Or 2017, when Theresa May needed the DUP to stay in power? Or 2019, when Johnson struck a deal with Farage?
317
2,329
10,736
In case you're wondering about the weird hysteria gripping the British right at the moment: -->The Labour government has yet to pass a single piece of legislation, because Parliament is in recess -->The sentencing guidelines for rioters haven't been changed since the election
256
1,332
9,557
793,874
Replying to @TomABacon @elonmusk
Twitter is an international platform. The law in one country is different to the law in another; indeed, the will of the people in one country is different to the will of the people in another. I strongly suspect you're going to wind up regretting this acquisition.
724
470
9,397
So, I've just spent a bit of time looking into the debate on IHT and farming. I... got a shock. First, a note: I have a friend who runs a family farm. In his view, the whole thing is a something and nothing. ๐Ÿงต
409
2,831
8,991
2,655,184
Replying to @elonmusk
There are several problems with your argument, I'm afraid. Firstly, political processes take time, and the technology of social media is always changing and adapting - meaning the law is playing catch-up, and the will of the people is usually ahead of it. Secondly... which law?
770
345
7,225
If you're going to understand Donald Trump's economic and industrial policy, I think there's one word you have to get: Grievance. ๐Ÿงต
116
1,053
7,740
372,799
Starmer, however, is keen to tell a different story: of a minority of thugs who are causing criminal damage, and who wind up in prison, paying the price for their criminality. It helps, of course, that his story is true. /3
20
231
6,428
487,211
I don't envy the PM right now. I don't even know if his choices are right. But I think I'm beginning to get it. I pray for him to have wisdom, and to be making the right calls. /end
143
228
6,312
330,108
Replying to @OliverDowden
Heh. Nice try, but everybody remembers the deal between the Conservatives and Nigel Farage in the 2019 election. If you consider this undemocratic, then what does that make the majority your party won back then?
43
384
5,695
Starmer knows there are outsiders desperate to bolster the lie - people like Elon Musk, who prattle on about civil war. We fool ourselves into thinking Musk doesn't know what he's talking about, but he does. He wants to push the lie. /4
28
292
5,567
473,551
Don't give up. For now? My prayers are with America. I'm sorry for what you're about to go through, and I wish I could do something to help. Just know it's never too late - not in a democracy. /end
302
359
5,089
79,308
Replying to @BorisJohnson
Now stand before the House of Commons and apologise. Correct the record. This isnโ€™t a game.
101
252
4,683
Instead, Starmer supports the police in their mission. Hundreds have been arrested already, and are standing before magistrates. Every one of them who is held to account stands as a symbol of the truth: these rioters are criminals who must be held to account, nothing more. /6
17
180
4,738
412,245
Stories have power, and there is a story they are desperate to tell: a tale of a people persecuted by their own rulers who rise up against them. This story portrays them as heroes, not as villains, so they desperately look for a chance to tell it. /2
17
163
4,546
493,454
And so the government tread a tightrope right now, wary lest they overstep and give the liars the tools they can use to bolster the lie. That, I think, is why Starmer is so reluctant to call in the army. He senses a trap. /5
15
155
4,048
433,173
At first glance, this seems appalling and absurd. But there's a reason Rishi Sunak is backed into a corner and can't apologize. Here's why. ๐Ÿงต nitter.app/TweetTheSpeaker/statusโ€ฆ /1
BREAKING: PM Rishi Sunak declines to apologise for his PMQs transgender joke as murdered teenager Brianna Gheyโ€™s mother watched on - despite pleas from Briannaโ€™s father
136
1,027
3,839
1,866,788
The question is whether he can break these far right groups before the worst happens. We came terriffyingly close yesterday, when these people tried to set two hotels ablaze while people were inside them. As awful as things have been, they can still get worse. /7
16
137
3,700
363,092
Replying to @Support
There's always a tweet, isn't there? @elonmusk
56
633
3,607
314,379
I'm well aware of Project 2025 and the like. But here's the thing: Trump isn't interested in the Project 2025 agenda. He's interested in the Trump agenda. He doesn't want to be managed or controlled. /8
50
247
3,373
132,305
You can probably see the parallels here, and hopefully see why I'm drawing some of this out. Trump is Johnson multiplied by a factor of ten or more. Do NOT expect a coherent agenda. /7
21
230
3,177
136,776
Likewise: My strong suspicion is that Donald Trump's government will fail. It will do so largely because of the character of the man in charge. /16
20
225
3,156
92,830
Here in the UK, we saw what happens when a clown has turned government into a circus at a time when you need actual government. That, I'm afraid, is what America is about to experience too. /14
21
323
2,978
102,242
OK, it simply has to be done. For the sake of my own amusement, I'm going to do a "diary" of Riishi Sunak's campaign - let's see if it can improve! First, a recap... ๐Ÿงต
65
401
3,029
1,652,761
First, an explanation: The U.K. chose Brexit in a referendum in 2016. But Brexit did not become truly inevitable until 2019, when the country doubled down on this decision and gave Boris Johnson a massive 80+-seat parliamentary majority. /2
17
176
2,912
179,072
Does this mean Trump's government will do no damage? No. But it does mean the damage it does will be scattershot, rather than the focused agenda seen in Project 2025. I don't know how far it'll get - I pray not far. /11
19
185
2,896
115,164
I don't know whether all this will give you relief or leave you even more stressed. But here's the thing to remember: Boris Johnson's government failed. It did so largely because of the character of the man in charge. /15
10
194
2,762
95,709
Don't expect to ever be able to say "I told you so" to Trump voters, incidentally. The goal isn't to be proved right; it's to win them over. "I told you so" causes people to dig in. So spend time listening and engaging. /17
38
253
2,793
94,374
Johnson liked power in theory, but had no real interest in what to do with it other than serve his own interests. He ran Downing Street like an old Medieval court, where people vied for his patronage. /5
23
183
2,754
152,071
Trump will run his White House like a Medieval court. He'll pursue an agenda for only so long, until he either loses focus... or somebody else catches his attention and he pursues their agenda instead. /10
15
215
2,762
116,611
Oh. Even better... So, in the last 12 years of Conservative dominance, you've needed other parties on board for all but four of them. (And you had a hung Parliament for two of those...)
Replying to @AdamBienkov
Doing deals with other political parties to win power is undemocratic, says Dowden.
21
191
2,557
Figure out how to WIN them, how to persuade them, how to play to their interests. Here in the U.K., Keir Starmer managed a remarkable feat in winning a strong majority through smart strategy. Do your own version. Engage. Persuade. Win. /18
27
191
2,512
87,698
Did you see how the election changed tone over the last few weeks, when he got bored of being kept under control and in check. You really think he'll sign up to somebody else's agenda? Or at least... sign up to it for long? /9
13
150
2,484
121,324
And make no mistake: there WILL be events. There are people all over the world eager to take advantage of the opportunity they've been given now - a chance to cause yet more chaos. /13
5
175
2,472
102,676
But the Johnson government got almost nothing done. Why? Well, to be fair, partly it was due to unforeseen circumstances: a global pandemic. But it was also partly because of Johnson himself. /4
6
126
2,332
158,800
Policy agendas were pursued as long as one person was up, and then dropped as soon as they were down. Johnson's attention moved from one thing to another, lacking any real direction. /6
3
133
2,320
141,926
But it's not over, because not all of it will happen. There will be a lot of damage, and it will take a very long time to repair the damage. Here, it'll probably take a decade or more. I'm afraid I suspect it'll take you longer still. /21
13
170
2,310
77,905
In context: our parliamentary system gives someone with an 80+-seat majority in parliament pretty much unlimited power. Their only real opposition comes from their own side. /3
3
137
2,292
174,315
And there's a second factor to consider: events, dear boy, events. We have the misfortune of living in "interesting times." For Johnson, the unforeseen event was a global pandemic. What will Trump's events be? /12
21
148
2,287
107,215
You know, looking at Twitter tonightโ€ฆ I canโ€™t help but feel this social media site has outlived any value to society. The moderation strategy has failed, to the point where I'm not sure whether it can be salvaged tbh. ๐Ÿงต
347
261
2,060
327,561
Replying to @kendallbaker
โ€ฆHmmm I foresee problems with this. I often have periods where I donโ€™t use Netflix for a while - usually because Iโ€™m watching something elsewhere. Iโ€™m gonna wind up blocked even though I havenโ€™t password shared lol
28
49
2,331
432,929
I can only conclude this is pure ego. But it's a battle he will lose, and indeed must lose, if we truly live in a country where a democratically elected government has primacy. /end
293
74
1,981
98,944
Ten landowners - just ten! - own one sixth of Dorset. They include Jonathan Harmsworth... whose family own the Daily Mail. Are alarm bells beginning to ring over the way this debate's being framed? /14
13
564
2,282
126,777
Likewise, right now, you feel crushed. Donald Trump and the Republican agenda seems unassailable. The constitutional reforms the Republicans are proposing have the potential to cement them in power for a long, long time. /20
12
145
2,055
78,813
I have an odd reaction to Labour's decisions of late. Whether we like it or not, they are driven by one simple fact: the country is in serious financial trouble. Public services are crumbling, and require heavy investment to recover. ๐Ÿงต
614
265
2,308
415,543
And this third point is very significant: we have evidence the rich are deliberately investing their money in land to avoid paying IHT. Jeremy Clarkson himself admitted that was why he bought so much land in an interview with the Times back in 2021. /5
15
266
2,176
184,599
Replying to @elonmusk
Still on the conspiracy train and yet trying to pretend you arenโ€™t a right winger lol?
165
23
1,911
The reality is, if X wishes to operate within our territory it must play by our rules. If it doesn't wish to play by our rules, it will either be fined until it does... or it will be blocked. /2
403
75
1,802
106,325
In 2019, I was crushed. A British government with a parliamentary majority of 80+ should've been unassailable. The constitutional reforms the Tories were proposing should've cemented them in power for a decade more. /19
5
124
1,894
82,325
Replying to @KyleJGlen
I hope this footage is used to identify these thugs and arrest them.
9
36
1,856
Replying to @ShankerASingham
We're literally at the stage of proposing benefit cuts for the poorest to pay for tax cuts for the rich. That's not reform, it's sabotage, and it will rightly drive the Tories out of power.
27
307
1,590
Today's Times contains some very important, and illuminating, quotes on Rishi Sunak. I'm not always a huge fan of Tim Shipman's columns - they focus too much on the Westminster "games" rather than policy - but this week's has some really useful nuggets. ๐Ÿงต
38
406
1,794
1,124,786
So: Rishi Sunak strays into yet another subject he is utterly unqualified to speak about, mental health. Let me tell you my story... ๐Ÿงต
35
274
1,692
338,069
To give a sense of comparison? Jeremy Clarkson purchased a whopping 400 hectares (20 times the average farm size) back in 2008. So whatever you do, don't think he's the average farmer; he really isn't. /7
22
264
1,867
168,024
Replying to @elonmusk
โ€ฆDude, we get it, you were expecting to be the centre of attention and the worldโ€™s just ignoring you. Seriously, attention-seeking to this degree isnโ€™t healthy.
181
25
1,703
114,513
What's more, the fact Musk has been daft enough to pick this fight means a whole lot of other countries while follow our lead. /3
73
59
1,471
100,661
A third of all farmland in the UK is farmed by tenant farmers like my friend (and everybody he knows around here), who'll be completely unaffected by the IHT changes. /2
84
228
1,597
201,892
An argument that assumes, 1) That No Deal threats were leverage (they werenโ€™t), 2) That we were ready for No Deal (we werenโ€™t even ready for a deal lol). You literally havenโ€™t learned anything, have you?
11
65
1,370
57,940
I find the level of hatred some guys have for Captain Marvel to be kind of ridiculous.
17
90
1,458
Replying to @RishiSunak
Not long now till you lot are out of office, and you can stop disgracing the country. Good riddance.
20
16
1,409
119,169
Replying to @timespolitics
Let me get this straight. The government tell people to get tested. They introduce new rules that end isolation earlier once you've tested negative. And then they make it so you have to pay to be tested.
30
123
1,455
Heโ€™s the first PM to resign not because of policy but deficient character. That you applauded him says a lot about your own party.
6
53
1,326
Replying to @trussliz @Telegraph
You didnโ€™t have a mandate. The public never supported your policies, and they crashed the country. A (much longer) period of silence and self-reflection would show maturity.
10
29
1,298
40,694
Brianna Ghey's father has used exactly the right word to describe this: it is "dehumanising." That is exactly what these words are designed to do, they strip others of their humanity. news.sky.com/story/brianna-gโ€ฆ /4
2
111
1,268
114,054
How big a problem is this? Well, almost half of all farms have less than 20 hectares of land. Incredibly, though, the average UK farm is 82 hectares - a staggeringly high sum that indicates how much land is owned by a minority. /6
30
172
1,422
176,865
And incidentally if your best counter-argument is trolling, then Iโ€™m afraid Angela Rayner isnโ€™t the one whose intelligence is in question right now.
9
39
1,220
Replying to @Conservatives
Meanwhile, Labour jot down every one of your attack lines, aware YOUR party is funded by business interests, Russian oligarchs, and companies you're supposed to be regulating. You people really aren't very bright.
9
22
1,251
43,628
This dehumanising of the vulnerable is not a bug, it is a feature. When a politician in a position of power deploys words to this effect, they are punching down on the vulnerable. Deliberately. /5
3
114
1,224
102,074
This, of course, is NOT the discussion that's happening in the media. Why not? Well, partly because a lot of famous, wealthy, and vocal people WILL be affected by the change to IHT (Jeremy Clarkson, Lloyd Webber, etc). /13
4
198
1,388
120,582
Want to get a sense of how things are getting worse? According to property consultants Strutt & Parker, non-farmers were responsible for less than a third of farmland purchases in 2010... but this had risen to 56% by last year. /8
7
244
1,355
161,688
โ€œAs a dog returns to its vomit, so a fool repeats his folly.โ€ Proverbs 26:11
34
267
1,250
110,604
Donald Trump has always been convinced he is a victim. Sure, he is a billionaire who became president of the United States, but he's convinced the game has always been rigged against him. /2
9
103
1,441
27,587
Replying to @elonmusk
*sigh* What's this particular meme even about? And seriously, why is the guy who wants to go to Mars wasting so much time on Twitter memes?
372
10
1,247
197,462
In the last year alone, 400,000 hectares of agricultural land have been taken out of use for farming, as the wealthiest purchase land. Doing so allows them to avoid IHT. /9
24
264
1,286
151,946
Replying to @JakeBerry
...Your party has been in government for THIRTEEN YEARS. You are the establishment. You are, by definition, the "business as usual Government." Is this the best you can do? To pretend the last 13 years of Conservative government didn't happen?
5
46
1,090
17,869
Replying to @DPJHodges
It is โ€œone of the most fundamental issuesโ€ TO YOU. The rest of us are much more concerned with things like energy bills, the cost of living, etc. Your obsession is myopic.
46
29
1,088
Replying to @KitKatisWeird7
Well, to be fair, they're not wrong. Anything has a "legitimate chance" of happening in a script that hasn't been written ๐Ÿ˜‚
1
4
1,258
Traditionally, IHT hasn't been applied to farmland to avoid the breakup of family farms. Now, though, that's working against the country; the wealthy are purchasing vast tracts of land that avoids paying IHT. /10
10
183
1,255
144,381
Replying to @LBC @NickFerrariLBC
People's circumstances change. My mum, for example? Complications during pregnancy, with longer-term health issues. My dad was made redundant, and later diagnosed with longer-term health issues due to chemicals he'd worked with. Circumstances change. Show compassion and humanity.
10
40
1,146
62,254
You know what happens in that scenario? The family farms that we're talking about trying to protect... are gone. If you want to talk about food security, the reality is that things are getting worse. /11
8
155
1,239
135,507
Replying to @SuellaBraverman
I agree. So stop talking about "invasions" and using racist dog-whistles of the kind that led Germany towards the Holocaust. Oh, and do something about the 200 missing children your department has failed to protect.
7
43
1,091
35,363
Grievance isn't just his character: it is his constituency, his electoral pitch. Because he also represents those who have grievances - both legitimate and imagined - against the way the world works. /3
3
96
1,325
27,093
Replying to @StuartAndrew
Of course, given there's no demonstrable problem requiring voter ID, this is actually all about voter suppression. Irony: It's beginning to look as though traditional Conservative voters may be the ones worst impacted. You lot really are absurd.
24
72
1,075
35,999
It's strange; if you asked me who I really thought "failed" over the local elections, it wouldn't be a political party. It would be the media.๐Ÿงต
16
119
1,034
135,325
I freely admit, after looking into the stats, I was left shaken. I had no idea British farming was in quite this bad shape. /end
60
131
1,204
98,238
Three things are worth noting: Firstly, any transfer of assets more than seven years before death is outside the scope of IHT. Secondly, the tax isn't a one-off sum - it's payable over a 10 year period, interest free. /4
48
127
1,202
184,066
Replying to @ReemAmirIbrahim
If it's "leftist" to consider war a bad thing, then I suspect most people are leftists.
7
17
1,073
32,585
Looking at this, there seems a strong case for IHT reform. The current situation is both unsustainable and deeply problematic, leading to an outcome we desperately want to avoid - where the wealthy own almost all the land and family farms are dying. /12
10
165
1,163
130,180
Replying to @Phobianiac
Encouraging rioters to burn people alive is not "mean tweets."
18
7
1,109
31,339
In fact, a culture war is not DESIGNED to be victimless. The whole point is to deliberately create an environment of hostility, anger, and tribalism. Such emotions naturally lead to vulnerable people suffering - because those emotions need targets. /3
6
84
1,032
120,854
Remember: 400,000 hectares of agricultural land were taken out of use for farming IN THE LAST YEAR. We can't allow that to continue, and so IHT reform seems like it's needed - to protect the industry. /18
21
193
1,155
98,943
And so Sunak and his supporters twist, and twist, and twist, pretending the people who were angered are the real culture warriors. It's soulless, but it's all they have. And, of course, they try to ignore the family, the vulnerable they have harmed. nitter.app/KemiBadenoch/status/17โ€ฆ /9
Every murder is a tragedy. None should be trivialised by political point-scoring. As a mother, I can imagine the trauma that Esther Ghey has endured. It was shameful of Starmer to link his own inability to be clear on the matter of sex and gender directly to her grief. (1/2)
4
89
993
130,587
All in all, then, Trump's whole strategy seems pretty foolish. If you wanted to design a system that encourages both companies and countries to start cutting the US out, this would be it. /end
33
140
1,211
14,342
And this is why Sunak cannot apologize for his actions. As far as he and his advisers are concerned, yesterday was a political mistake - deploying dehumanising words in a context where they became too visibly crass. /6
2
66
934
96,224
Replying to @JMPSimor
I genuinely think the challenge facing the next government will literally be to undo everything this government has done.
51
92
903
Regarding the "young people have no discipline" - every young person I know followed lockdown willingly, no matter the cost. The same was not true of Conservative MPs or Boris Johnson, and even their current Prime Minister was fined for a breach of lockdown.
10
151
929
17,202
Replying to @BethRigby
โ€œInvasion.โ€ Good grief, the woman is insane. Her job is to calm things down, notโ€ฆ THIS.
24
61
876
Whichever imbeciles in the Treasury are coming up with this idea, they should be sacked immediately. Absolutely pathetic.
12
40
945