Grinding all day and we finally tapped into the CT side of the market. Definitely the biggest account I have to move, but we're gonna cook it up See you all in the FT OTC Desk room 🫡 friend.tech/NFTAura

Saving that for history in case

We are now cooking

may stance is pretty neutral wen it comes to tg trading bots and web based ones, but am seeing some big "advocates" - that racked in ~5k+ followers from the unibot play in May and max shillin since - move to alternatives n shillin there cuz there will be a token drop smh

So $UNIBOT is refunding ppl in eth not tokens lol. Not even attempting to care about their 800 users. Many lost positions in their tokens. U tax farmed hundreds of millions and pay RookieXBT, Miles Deutscher 11e a month to shill but u can't refund users. Rug job. Pathetic.

I still haven’t sold any $BANANA

Unibot Update 🦄🤖 The token approval exploit we suffered on Oct 31 has been fully addressed and trading with Unibot is back to normal. As stated previously, the issue was solely related to trades made against a newly deployed router contract that was vulnerable to attack. The issue was isolated to tokens and did not affect ETH balances. The refunds have been processed, but it was a complex process so we will review any cases that necessitate it. Please follow below for the full detail. Summary of Events At around Ethereum block number 18467790, malicious actors deployed a contract and began to attack the Unibot router. The attackers funneled tokens out of around 600 affected wallets that had granted token approvals to the newest Unibot Router (which had begun receiving volume about 18 hours prior to the incident). In total around $600k was lost in the exploit which the Unibot team has covered in full with a cost basis of $1.78m. Shortly after, the team responded by halting any further trades via the vulnerable contract. Thereafter we began revoking any problematic token approvals in affected user wallets to mitigate further losses. Several users withdrew their ETH which prevented our approval revocation. We sent ETH to the relevant wallets in order to revoke approvals and complete our exploit mitigation. Remediation After mitigating the exploit, the majority of our time was spent recouping lost tokens for our users. We concluded that the following approach for the refund would be the most equitable solution: 1. Market bought majority of the tokens that were lost (141 of the 164 affected tokens, ~ 86%). 2. For @joecoin_, our biggest impacted coin in value, we recovered the entire lost token balance in full (~$370k at the time of refund). 3. Likewise, for tokens such as $DAVID, $AIX, $MSTR, $BCAT, $TISM, and $CHAINS we recovered 100% of the tokens. In the case of $TISM, $KEKEC and $BCAT we also added 50% of the ETH value at the time of the exploit to compensate for the significant price fall. 4. For tokens that had dropped significantly in value (e.g. $MILK) by the time of refund, we sent the ETH value at the time of the transfer exploit. 5. For other tokens that had low market cap, or had poor liquidity relative to value, we gave a full refund in ETH at the time of exploit with an additional 20-35% bonus (e.g. $ACAT). Although we made our best effort, please be mindful that low-cap token prices can be quite volatile. The refund process took quite a number of hours due to its complexity, hence some token prices may have moved unfavourably in the interim. Reach out to us if you have concerns. In addition, we have two updates: - For the next 10 days, trading fees are reduced to 0% for all Unibot transactions - $UNIBOT holders revenue share increase from 2 -> 3% for the month of November. To put it simply, during this period, 100% of token taxes will be directed back to our valued holders. After a short rest we will follow up with an announcement when these bonuses are in effect. To our users and our community, we sincerely apologize. You all expect us to deliver at a high level of standards that we've set from the onset, and we will do everything to continue delivering at those standards. We'll be working with tier 1 auditors to strengthen our security around new features and push industry leading practices in protecting our users. "The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing." - Henry Ford We will come back stronger from this just like we did from our initial migration. Thank you everyone for your love and support. Lastly, please join our Telegram if you have more questions or concerns.

best memecoin traders on CT @kelxyz_ @artsch00lreject @free_electron0 @metaversejoji @NBA__trey @owen1v9 @blockgraze @NullFUD @motocap_ @wrld_sol @Rewkang @0xLawliette @BasedShillBH

You are allowed to be a scammer as long as you are bullish

seems like the mkt is finally realising $banana was undervalued because of the insane organic rev share i realised that the mkt was wrong and bought a bunch but still sold it way too early because of aids price action note to self: have more conviction in yourself

i said ill be leaving so im leaving dont know when ill be back again i figured today will be as good of a day as any other day

*US SEEKS MORE THAN $4 BILLION FROM BINANCE TO END CRIMINAL CASE Source: Bloomberg | Coins: BNB

Zeus reminding people he his the best top in the world in front of 1.5 million spectator online lmfaoooo

Some large accounts claim to be profitable, but the majority of their opinions on the market are incorrect How to square that circle?

if a token goes up 200% how many X’s does your initial investment have?

Old nfts/gamefi assets being resurrected. Indications of a massive gamefi run in the upcoming bull.

Appreciate all the people I've met in this space that have helped me & given me advice thank you forreal you made a difference in my life

amazing how we collectively trust racer so much, nobody even dared to suggest that he rugged

There are a lot of components of Blast that I’m excited about and would be interested in engaging with people on. That said, we at Paradigm think the announcement this week crossed lines in both messaging and execution. For example, we don’t agree with the decision to launch the bridge before the L2, or not to allow withdrawals for three months, since we think it sets a bad precedent for other projects. We also think much of the marketing cheapens the work of a serious team. We backed Pacman and his cofounder because they demonstrated an ability to build great products over many years, starting with Namebase, one of Paradigm’s first investments. Next, they worked on Blur, a cutting-edge pro NFT marketplace. I got to witness their exceptional technical talent firsthand when I collaborated with them on the design of a new NFT-collateralized lending protocol called Blend. When Pacman told us he had a vision for the L2 chain that he wanted to use to scale Blur and build on its success, we invested behind him again. We still think they are world-class builders who can deliver an L2 that brings value to the ecosystem. We’ve been discussing our concerns with the team and appreciate their willingness to engage with us, but there are still many points of disagreement. We invest in strong, independent founders who we don’t always agree with. But we understand that people may look to us to set an example on best practices in crypto. We don’t endorse these kinds of tactics and take our responsibility in the ecosystem seriously.

ppl are already claiming this will be the "last" cycle lol? time is a flat circle