Small point but:
Reeves' original letter to the PM last night said "we were not aware that a licence was necessary, and so we did not obtain the licence before letting the property out."
But the letting agent says they "offered to apply for a licence on these clients' behalf".
So if they offered to get her a licence, presumably Reeves/her husband were aware of the need to have one?
Rachel Reeves’ letting agent takes responsibility and appears to bail her out
Gareth Martin, owner of Harvey Wheeler, said: "We alert all our clients to the need for a licence. In an effort to be helpful our previous property manager offered to apply for a licence on these clients' behalf, as shown in the correspondence. That property manager suddenly resigned on the Friday before the tenancy began on the following Monday.
"Unfortunately, the lack of application was not picked up by us as we do not normally apply for licences on behalf of our clients; the onus is on them to apply. We have apologised to the owners for this oversight.
"At the time the tenancy began, all the relevant certificates were in place and if the licence had been applied for, we have no doubt it would have been granted.
"Our clients would have been under the impression that a licence had been applied for. Although it is not our responsibility to apply, we did offer to help with this.
"We deeply regret the issue caused to our clients as they would have been under the impression that a licence had been applied for."