In 2004 I was the first person (who was not an expert hired by CBS) to notice that the Bush Texas Air National Guard documents were forgeries because they were supposedly from 1972 but were in a proportionally spaced font. At home. In my boxer shorts. Posted about it on FreeRepublic.com, then told the wife.

DOJ/FBI raided Jeff Clark’s house at 7:00 AM and made him stand outside in his boxers while they searched his house “for their protection.” They raided Mar-a-Lago with 40-50 guys with guns, went through Melania’s knickers.

Yes. Most of the time when they get caught on something like that it blows over in less than a week and is soon forgotten. I think the lesson they've taken from that is that it doesn't matter, so they've gotten progressively worse over time.

It’s comical at multiple levels that an associate would imagine herself in a position to issue diktats as to how a 1,700 lawyer firm should be run. Lawyers serve the interests of their clients, not the vanity political beliefs of the associates. On the bright side, it’s a semi-free country so, unlike Spartacus, she is free to start her own firm and run it however she wants. For her sake I hope she finds fulfillment in that direction. When she's signing the checks she may have a different view of her associates sending her demands like this one. LOL.

One patter than seems to be emerging is that officials of the Biden Admin leave, join a pop-up, and then the pop-up receives gazillions of dollars. Seems pretty likely kickbacks were being paid one way or another.

I have the honor, with Charles Burnham and Robert Destro, of representing Jeff Clark. If we ever get a fair hearing, Jeff Clark will be exonerated. They want to disbar Mr. Clark for “dishonesty” for recommending in a privileged setting that the Department of Justice take a different position on contested matters of fact, law and policy. In a draft letter that was never even sent. This has no precedent in the entire history of lawyer discipline because giving clients independent professional judgment in a confidential setting – even when it runs against a consensus of other advisors – is a fundamental ethical obligation under the Rules of Professional Conduct. If this travesty stands it will wreck the profession and harm clients and the public interest. But there other important interests at stake. The federal government is supreme over the states and local governments. The constitutional structure of our government cannot stand if the operations of the Executive Branch of government can be hobbled by an organ of a single local government that has decided to wage political warfare against the national government through the medium of a bogus ethics case.

Look at the Federal Accounts from which the Biden Admin paid Politico: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy? Advanced Technology Vehicles? Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee Program?

With the federal executive branch in Republican hands, Democrat lawfare is being waged in venues the left still controls, such as bar disciplinary processes in left wing jurisdictions. D.C. voted Democrat more than 90% against Trump all three times he was on the ballot - the most lopsided margin in the country to have it's own Bar, and one that covers the many thousands of lawyers working in the HQ of the national government. The doctrine of federal supremacy protects the federal government and its employees from obstruction and harassment by hostile local officials. This is taught in the first week of constitutional law classes starting with the Supremacy Clause and McCullough v. Maryland. It is the animating principle of ~180 years of federal officer removal law under 28 USC 1442 and its predecessor statutes (at least until the ridiculous decision in Meadows v. Georgia in the 11th Circuit). The District of Columbia was itself created to insulate the federal government from hostile neglect or abuse by a state government that would not come to its aid in a time of need. Now, however, the federal government is headquartered in one of the most hostile jurisdictions in the country. Bar discipline is being weaponized to hobble the administration by destroying key officials, intimidating others from the vigorous execution of their duties, and deterring still others from even joining the government. McCullough v. Maryland held in 1819 that: “[N]o principle of [state power] … can be admissible, which would defeat the legitimate operations of a supreme government.” There are literally "many such cases" holding that states cannot impede the operations of the federal government such as but not limited to prosecuting or fining or otherwise impeding its officers in the execution of their duties. For D.C. as the seat of government, it's just the same, only more so. But that's exactly what's going on with Bar warfare, or perhaps we could call it "Barfare." The authority of the D.C. Bar over federal lawyers is extremely dubious. Until the McDade Act was passed in an omnibus spending bill in 1998, DOJ's position was that state or local disciplinary authority over DOJ lawyers was barred by federal supremacy. The McDade Act granted disciplinary authority to the states but the statute conspicuously omits D.C. in contrast to many other statutes that specifically refer to both the States and DC when they so choose. Under ordinary rules of statutory construction, the statute does not grant such authority to D.C., the ruling of the D.C. Court of Appeals to the contrary notwithstanding. In 1999 Janet Reno's DOJ issued regulations at 28 C.F.R. Part 77 implementing the McDade Act. In 28 C.F.R. Section 77.2(h) the reg purports to extend disciplinary authority to D.C despite the omission such authority from the statute. This was obviously a Chevron step 1 violation, and after Loper Bright, there is simply no excuse for so plainly exceeding the scope of the statute. Neither agencies nor courts can replace omissions in statutes. Moreover, even if the statute and the regulations properly give the D.C. Bar authority over federal lawyers, their terms require federal lawyers be treated equally with non-federal lawyers and disciplined only to the same extent and for the same conduct as local lawyers. That ship sailed a long time ago. DOJ can put a stop to this by rescinding 28 C.F.R. 77.2(h), which is unconstitutional on grounds of (1) supremacy and (2) separation of powers. It is also erroneous as a matter of statutory interpretation. DOJ could also rescind the regulation on the ground that its (and the statute's) requirement of equal treatment is being egregiously violated. The federal government's acquiescence to the McDade Act should also be reconsidered on supremacy grounds. D.C. is not the only hostile jurisdiction resorting to Barfare. Federal supremacy cannot be reconciled with a local bar association claiming punitive authority over confidential internal deliberations by the President of the United States with his senior legal advisors that occur within the zone of his exclusive and preclusive authorities under Article II. If this is not stopped, every attorney in DOJ who offends liberal pieties is at risk, even for confidential drafts that never even leave the office.

Fulton County counted 142,026 absentees w/o any signature verification, because the $1 million system they bought for that purpose never worked. Signature verification was an unambiguous statutory prerequisite to counting those votes. By itself sufficient for election contest.

They should get some quality time in prison

If Seymour Hersh is right then all those military service chiefs who considered it their primary job to restrain Trump and keep him from getting us into a big war just sat there nodding along like bobble head dolls when Biden decided to blow up Nordstream 2

The United States of America has filed an Amicus Brief in support of Jeffrey Clark with the D.C. Court of Appeals.

Considering the provocation, the tone of the dissent is very mild.

You wrote a prosecution memo aimed at a lot of these people

Yes, to people of a certain age and experience - of which there are very many - it was extremely obvious.

Seems like a good time to mention that in Jeff Clark’s Bar case I challenged Biden’s purported waiver of executive privilege on the grounds that he lacked sufficient mental capacity to do so.

Right - I think it was 12 point, but that point about the specific font identification and the date of its availability was nailed down in the Peter Tytell analysis.

During I think the Second Battle of Fallujah, there was a media interview of a captain who ordered a tank to hit a minaret tower in a mosque where a sniper was perched. The reporter asked him why he gave the order to attack a holy place. His answer was "In order to kill the enemy."

Totally epic. Note that it is a British reporter doing the job Americans won't do. Should ignite a political wildfire.

CBS hired 4 document experts to look at the documents. Two of them told the producer Mary Mapes the documents were flat out fakes b/c of the fonts, the superscript, etc. She blew them off, lied about what they had said to witnesses, colleagues and her bosses, and went to air anyway. Malevolent liar.

"Election interference" is a made-up propaganda buzzword used by the Democrats the last 9 years to destroy Trump and Trump World. Now that the shoe is on the other foot we finally get the epiphany that there's no such crime. The conduct may be a crime in some other way but not that.

Exactly. Anybody that knew the least thing about typography could instantly tell those documents were fake - a big reason the story took off like it did. There was a brief flurry in which the IBM Composer - the machine you are talking about - was touted as a possible way to have made those docs, but (1) that was a high end machine that would never be in an Air National Guard office and (2) was later definitively excluded by Peter Tytell in his report for the Thornburgh-Boccardi Report, and IIRC by Joseph Newcomer in his analysis. Basically every criteria of analysis was overwhelming that they were forged and literally nothing showed they were genuine. The score was like a 100 - 0.

The J6 Committee was by far the worst abuse of Congressional investigative authority in U.S. History. Blinded by Trump derangement, they ran a blitzkrieg of constitutional abuses on hundreds of innocent people.

1. The elite schools are destroying them themselves by going woke. They are excluding extremely bright kids and admitting morons, excluding brilliance professors and hiring incompetent bozo ass clowns. They've become shit schools because everything woke turns to shit. This goes for their grad schools as well. 2. Elite kids shut out of the elite shit schools are being pushed down into big state schools mostly. They can get an undergraduate education there. But their presence significantly upgrades those schools. 3. Elite kids shut out of elite shit schools go on to be excluded from elite shit graduate schools, and are shunted into slightly less elite grad schools, substantially upgrading them and enhancing their reputations as they enter the workforce. I've heard it said that employers would much rather hire a kid from Ga. Tech than MIT for such reasons. 4. Don't bother applying to elite schools. Let them rush to hell without. Make your way, and save your money, at a non-shit school.

Filing in all 94 districts is a pluperfect proof that it's a political question and not a discrete lawsuit involving a particular plaintiff or plaintiffs with a particular claim.

Bragg should read the Sixth Amendment. "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to … be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation;"

Alt start of No Country for Old Men

There's only 2 Grand Tours now, and 1 Shit Tour.

Methane is irrelevant to climate. Bovine methane emissions are just the same, only more so. co2coalition.org/media/metha…

Imagine being admitted to Harvard without knowing algebra.

He can’t resign from a position to which he was never lawfully appointed.

It has not penetrated the public mind that there was no signature verification in Fulton in Nov. 2020. Over 146,000 absentee ballots were counted w/o it - ILLEGALLY. In GA we give statutes their plain meaning-unless they are election statutes, in which case they have no meaning.

I’ve been fighting for Jeff Clark for 4 years now. While our principal opponents have been Fani Willis in Georgia and the DC Office of Disciplinary Counsel, it’s important to recognize that the genesis of this case stems from improper anonymous leaks to the media. In late January 2021, someone(s) leaked to Katie Benner at the New York Times and those anonymous leaks caused House and Senate Committees — and many others in the media — to start harassing Mr. Clark. Of course, Jeff Clark didn’t leak to a leftist NYT reporter to to bring the sky falling on himself - some other lawyer or subordinate reporting to a DOJ or White House lawyer unethically leaked to Benner. We’ve been saying this without contradiction for four years and, to our knowledge, at no point has the DC Bar or anyone ever disputed the point. Nor has any authority bothered to investigate the blatantly illegal and unethical leak that spawned 4 years of lawfare against Mr. Clark.

Incredible incompetence from race organizers and law enforcement.

My theory: their political views are the foundation of their sense of self as virtuous people. The more they hate Trump, for example, the more virtuous they are. Any disagreement or disproof of the political opinions or their foundations thus threatens the structure on which self-image as a virtuous person is built. They don't take it well.

The end times approach - the 9th Circuit is to the right of the Supreme Court.

Dems have nominated and confirmed many judges who are indeed radical left lunatics, a hair’s breadth from being actual communists, and you are getting the vapors about Emil Bove.

Those leading Harvard, MIT, et. al.'s quest for martyrdom on the altar of DEI may wish to consult Bob Jones Univ. v. U.S., 461 U.S. 574 (1983), in which BJU was denied tax-exempt status for practicing racial discrimination contrary to public policy. From the syllabus: "(b) The IRS's 1970 interpretation of § 501(c)(3) was correct. It would be wholly incompatible with the concepts underlying tax exemption to grant tax-exempt status to racially discriminatory private educational entities. Whatever may be the rationale for such private schools' policies, racial discrimination in education is contrary to public policy. Racially discriminatory educational institutions cannot be viewed as conferring a public benefit within the above "charitable" concept or within the congressional intent underlying § 501(c)(3). Pp. 461 U. S. 592-596." supreme.justia.com/cases/fed…

J6 lawyers walking into court tomorrow.

The second half of this time series has major statistical anomalies - eminent statistician & PhD mathematician testified that properties of the second half of the time series could not possibly be correct. And, as we know, there was no signature verification on these ballots.

I like it. And if they were representing him in his personal capacity it was a gratuity that he was most likely not allowed to receive, and suggests a possible conflict between his personal and official roles. All kinds of problems.

The media & left are frustrated and angry that the public does not see Trump in the way they depict him. The truth is the public sees right through their lies, but they are too arrogant and stupid to realize it.

Maybe, instead of wailing about Trump, and in order to restore the funding, UCLA could try complying with Title VI and the Constitution and not discriminating on the basis of race and protecting their Jewish students.

"I want to go to college so I can crush liberal dweezils in class discussions, and your school is an irresistibly target rich environment." Probably not getting in.

Similar play to the recusal play against Jeff Sessions. Sessions was naive and rolled over, and they put in DOJ lifers who ran that investigation as a silent coup against Trump.

I was told by Rich Donoghue and Jeff Rosen that DOJ had no role in telling states how to run elections.

Also, the natural origin story fell apart to the point of farce very early on. Only those with the incentive or compulsion to lie kept pushing it.

The more CJ Roberts strains to preserve the legitimacy of courts by elevating what he thinks is "legitimacy" above deciding on the merits, the worse it gets. Legitimacy is a byproduct of the quality of their decisions. It's not a direct output and can't be directly managed.

How can a person with no memory write a memoir?

The greatest fraud in the history science has resulted in trillions wasted with zero effect on climate whilst immiserating billions of consumers and enriching scammers

He put a ginormous fireplace right in the middle of it. What a dork.

This is a big win for a great lawyer. Let the world know that she and her husband John Merchant only claimed $300 per hour for this case, which is, let me tell you, "We too low." Should be double or triple that.

The North Vietnamese are going to surrender any day now.

The wrongful and abusive Fulton County prosecution of Jeff Clark is barred not just by the absolute immunity of Trump v US, but also by federal supremacy, a bedrock constitutional principle since McCullough the Maryland.

The IPCC has been lying about carbon cycle the whole time. This chart is from a book published in 2008.

Now that the election in Fulton has been proven to have been in significant and compound violation of Georgia election law, all those being prosecuted or facing bar discipline for questioning that election should be liberated, apologized to and compensated.

Supreme Court is having a hysterical moral panic over Trump! and have themselves so twisted in knots that they are blasting through one rule after another - procedural, jurisdictional, & substantive, to include structural constitutional barriers - to require Trump! to comply perfectly with technical convolutions and absurdities that not even Jonathan Swift could have conjured in a fever dream.

It would a great honor to be in a foxhole with you. 🫡

Forget it Daniel, it's the Atlantic.

Bruce Arena said it best: “If you got 24 players better than Landon Donovan you should win the Workd Cup.”

The govt has cut 1.4 billion in grants to Harvard over their illegal racial discrimination IIRC. If you’re on the Board and owe fiduciary duties you have only 2 moves: Fix it or resign.

That district court order may be the craziest one yet issued. Case should be taken away from them - they are totally off the chain.

Not wrong.

How does she know? It suggests an alliance between the DC Bar Disciplinary Counsel and the J6 Committee, which we have long suspected but which both of them vehemently denied.

Not even a crow hop. Just catch, turn & fire

Supreme Court clerks and federal appellate clerks are all in their 20s.

Trump should not even wait until he gets to the White House after inauguration. He should go straight into the Capital and sign at least 50 MOAB executive orders as soon as he finishes his speech. Then, when he gets to the White House, he should sign 100 more. And he’ll need DOJ locked and loaded Day 1 to defend them.

Just and Ordinary Joe who noticed something and say "Hey, would you look at that!"

cc @IfindRetards This is so stupid that only Sunderland could have done it.

Ann Coulter: "If there are going to be gays in the military, I demand that there be heterosexuals at the New York Times." piped.video/8DZm3nBjhe8

Dr. Amanda Cohn, the gal on the left suggesting just stick it in the other arm: "She recently joined Sanofi Vaccines Medical as Head of New Products and Innovation." convention.bio.org/speaker/a…

This didn't used to happen because anybody that tried it would have literally gotten their ass beaten and run out of town on a rail.

Total BS that you are paid grant money to write. Nobody believes it anymore.

The J6 Committee was a rogues' gallery of rotten liars and scoundrels whose abuses far exceed those of any other Congressional committee in U.S. history. Made all the more repellent by the nauseating sanctimony with which they clothed themselves.

The audience is kids who haven’t even thought of it yet, to inoculate them against this particular social contagion

Gotta believe all the references to King George and monarchs were like a "Right On!" to the "No Kings" protests on Saturday.

Because they are Soldiers in an Army of Lies, waging Total Information Warfare. The reputation they care about is for loyalty to the revolution, not to the truth.

The Stadium of Light is 131 feet above sea level. Local sea level rise is .62 feet per century. It would take 211 centuries, or 21,000 years, to reach the stadium.

Good thread. Well-explained.

And I thought the day could not possibly get any better for climate skeptics. The hits just keep on coming.

It does not appear that she has read Trump v. US or the long train of precedent on which it relies, nor the Opinions Clause of the Constitution, nor 28 USC 511 which says "The Attorney General shall give his advice and opinion on questions of law when required by the President."

One of the worst public health decisions in human history. Thanks, Dr. Fauci!!

Because Antifa is the paramilitary wing of the Democrat party

I often think about the trillions in real estate value destroyed in downtown areas by the "pervasive social disorder" to which you refer.

Same with executive privilege which has been swept aside to get Trump

If the CCP were running the Washington Post how would anybody tell the difference?

How, under the Supremacy Clause, do States have standing to challenge the internal operations of the Treasury Department. This is completely nuts and has been since McCullough v. Maryland decided in 1819: "The Court has bestowed on this subject its most deliberate consideration. The result is a conviction that the States have no power, by taxation or otherwise, to retard, impede, burden, or in any manner control the operations of the constitutional laws enacted by Congress to carry into execution the powers vested in the General Government. This is, we think, the unavoidable consequence of that supremacy which the Constitution has declared.

Zigged when he should’ve zagged

Last 4 years the Supremacy Clause has sheltered Biden allowing illegal alien invasion from all legal challenges. Folks fixing to find out the Supremacy Clause works both ways.

Justice Jackson telling somebody they don't understand something is comedy gold.

Asked ChatGPT why it lies and seems unaware it is lying: "It's important to note that I don't have a built-in capability to independently verify the truthfulness or accuracy of the information I provide."

The trash took itself out.

Absolutely amazing that to preserve the "rule of law" and restrain purportedly lawless unchecked authority, they shred the rule of law and wield lawless unchecked authority.

Ukraine was very foolish to get itself so entangled in partisan US presidential politics. The U.S. was very foolish to entangle its presidential politics in the inscrutable vipers nest of corruption that is Ukraine.

Another shining example of Roberts trying to protect the judiciary in a way that ends up making the judiciary ridiculous.

Democrats horrified that Georgia Election Code might actually be followed. OCGA 21-2-70(8) imposes duty to "inspect systematically and thoroughly the conduct of primaries and elections" and (15) an oath to "prevent[] fraud" & "make a true and perfect returns" of elections.

He lies constantly, instinctively, reflexively. He just says whatever he thinks is expedient at the moment with literally zero regard for what he said before even if it was a few days ago and zero regard for whether it’s true. The arrogance of a tyrant.

The firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor at the bidding of Burisma seems like it would qualify.

LOL. Boasberg certified as a class a group designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization without any briefing from the government and without any analysis of the criteria for class certification under Rule 23. In an area the S.Ct. has explicitly and emphatically said is not subject to judicial review.

Weinsheimer in his exit interview