No hate for the person who made this. I am all for people trying to innovate.
With that said, If I showed up to an interview and the company wanted me to interview with an AI tool, I would simply close the window. Nothing feels more dehumanizing than being shown that I am not worth any of the company's time than to spend my interview trying to get the AI tool to record my answers to then have someone in HR inevitably skim the responses the same way they skim resumes.
If anything, I feel like this is the kind of tool that makes it harder for people to get jobs instead of interviewers finding great candidates.
What do you think?
Excited to introduce the world鈥檚 first AI interviewer, gpt-vetting.
With gpt-vetting, you can interview 100x more candidates in less time & candidates get a more enjoyable, gamified, and less biased interview experience.
You define the skills you want the interview to focus on, gpt-vetting asks verbal questions, and then jumps into a coding exercise. You then review the report that includes an AI assessment of each tech stack, and a trust score.
In its beta, gpt-vetting has already conducted 13,000 AI interviews, saving ~10k hours for software engineers who would otherwise be conducting technical interviews.