yes, he’s wrong. in the context of this argument, the statement “a human fetus isn’t a human being” almost always means “a foetus isn’t a person” — that is, it doesn’t possess rights, self-awareness, or the capacity for suffering and thought.
i can’t speak for other East Asian countries, but in Japan, the cultural line between reality and fiction is very sharply drawn. the Japanese are adept at telling the two apart. you could say that proshipping is their default stance.
pretentious twaddle. “art” is a nebulous, subjective, human construct used to label a vast swathe of pointless activities that have no objective value or purpose.
the so-called “point of art” shifts from person to person, culture to culture, and era to era.there’s no objectively—
unfortunately, emotions tend to cloud people’s judgement, and they refuse to understand this obvious point. instead, they immediately accuse the person who voices it of paedophilia.
because in Japanese culture, France is often associated with refinement, aristocracy, romanticism, and decadence — qualities that fit perfectly with the philosophy of Visual Kei.
if you believe that certain fictional relationships, themes, or types of content should not be created, shared, or consumed, then you are not anti-censorship.
how about we leave diagnosing people’s “issues” to the qualified professionals, eh, you anonymous little cretin from Twitter with no relevant knowledge or education?
of course, there’s no problem whatsoever. that creature is simply a narrow-minded, self-absorbed, and infantile slave to social convention, a member of the hoi polloi who’s terrified of anything that falls outside the scope of their rudimentary understanding of the world.
a crystal-clear example of fragile masculinity. if you genuinely believe that shaving body hair makes you gay, then you’re a pathetic, insecure conformist, and a slave to irrational fears imposed upon you by the very same primitive herd you're so desperate to belong to.
an LLM isn’t the most reliable source. i could ask it the same thing and get a diametrically opposed answer (and potentially an even more well-argued one, as in this instance):